Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An HPSG-Analysis for Free Relative Clauses in German

  • Published:
Grammars

Abstract

At the moment there is no theory for free relative clauses in German in the framework of Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG). From GB literature on the subject it is known that free relative clauses behave partly like noun phrases. They can fill argument positions of verbs. And although they are finite sentences, they are serialized like noun phrases in the German Mittelfeld. The function free relative clauses can take is not restricted to complements. Depending on the properties of the relative phrase, free relative clauses can be modifiers as well. I will argue that free relative clauses project to a category that is tightly related to the category of the relative phrase.

As Ingria90 has shown, assignment of different cases in the relative and the matrix clause poses problems for grammars that rely on unification alone. In the following paper I will show that his subsumption based account is incompatible with standard assumptions in the HPSG framework. The set-based approach of DK97, which is similar in many respects to Ingria's approach, will also be discussed. It will be shown that some of the problems of the subsumption based account are still present in the set-based approach. I will provide a different solution to the problem that relies on an additional case feature for the case form of NPs. It is projected from the relative phrase and is not affected by case requirements of the verb.

In general, there are three possibilities to describe the projections of free relative clauses: firstly, the direct projection of a phrase from the relative phrase and a finite sentence, secondly, an empty head or a unary projection that projects a relative clause and thirdly, a lexical rule that changes the subcategorization frames of governing heads in a way that they subcategorize for relative clauses. I will argue for the unary schema and discuss the alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, H. Formen der Herausstellung im Deutschen: Rechtsversetzung, Linksversetzung, freies Thema und verwandte Konstruktionen, No. 106 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Max Niemeyer Verlag. Tübingen, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgustinova, T., Relative Clause Constructions in Bulgarian HPSG. CLAUS-Report 71, University of the Saarland, Saarbrücken, 1996. http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/claus/claus71.html. 07.24.97

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausewein, K. Haben kopflose Relativsätze tatsächlich keine Köpfe?. In: G. Fanselow and S. W. Felix, editors, Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, No. 39 in Studien zur deutschen Grammatik. Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen, 144–158, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, S. The Coordination of Unlike Categories. Language, 72(3): 579–616, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, S. and M. Johnson. Features and Agreement. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the ACL. Boston, 70–76, 1995. E-Print-Archive: http://xxx.lanl.gov/cmp-lg/9506007.04.14.97.

  • Bouma, G. Extraposition as a Nonlocal Dependency. In: Proceedings of Formal Grammar 96. Prague, 1–14, 1996. http://www.let.rug.nl/~gosse/papers/. 07.24.97.

  • Dalrymple, M. and R. Kaplan: A Set-based Approach to Feature Resolution. In: M. Butt and T. H. King, editors, Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference, University of California, SanDiego. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, 1997. http://wwwcsli. stanford.edu/publications/LFG2/dalrymple-kaplan-lfg97.ps. 11.05.97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duden, Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, Vol. 4. Mannheim, Wien, Zürich: Dudenverlag,5th edition, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, P. A Note on Identity of Constituents. Linguistic Inquiry, 4: 417–420, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, P.Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart,1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, P. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Verlag J.B. Metzler, 3rd edition, Stuttgart, Weimar, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, U. Syntax der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, Vol. 22 of Grundlagen der Germanistik Berlin: Schmidt, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flickinger, D.P. and J. Nerbonne, Inheritance and Complementation: A Case Study of Easy Adjectives and Related Nouns. Computational Linguistics, 18(3): 269–309. Walter Daelemans and Gerald Gazdar, editors, Inheritance and Natural Language Processing, special issue: 1992. http://www.dfki.de/lt/papers/cl-abstracts.html#RR-91-30.abstract. 07.21.97.

  • Gross, A. and H. van Riemsdijk. Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar. In: A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi, editors, Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 171–216, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, T.N. Topologische Felder. Köln, ms. 1983.

  • Ingria, R.J.P. The Limits of Unification. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eight Annual Meeting of the ACL. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 194–204, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge: Massachusetts, London: England: The MIT Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, W. Kleine Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, R.T., A. Kathol, and C.J. Pollard. Linear Precedence Constraints and Reentrancy. In: J. Kilbury and R. Wiese, editors, Integrative Ansätze in der Computerlinguistik. Düsseldorf, 49–54, 1995. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~kathol/Papers/DGfS-CL95.ps.gz. 14.04.97.

  • Keller, F. Towards an Account of Extraposition in HPSG. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Dublin, 1995. ftp://ftp.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/pub/papers/keller/eacl95.ps.gz. 04.15.97.

  • Koch, U. Deutsche Relativsätze in HPSG. http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~koch/stuarb.ps.gz. 07.01.98. Studienarbeit, Universität Koblenz-Landau, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, St. Problems with Complement Extraction Lexical Rules. http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_celr.html. 07.12.1999. ms. Humboldt University, Berlin,1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, St. The Babel-System — An HPSG Prolog Implementation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Practical Application of Prolog. London, 263–277, 1996. http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_babel.html. 07.12.1999.

  • Müller, St. Complement Extraction Lexical Rules and Argument Attraction. Research Report RR-97-08, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz, Saarbrücken. A slightly different version appeared in Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology. Results of the 3rd KONVENS Conference, Bielefeld, October 1996. (1997a). http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_case_celr.html. 07.12.1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, St. Scrambling in German — Extraction into the Mittelfeld. Research Report RR-97-06, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz, Saarbrücken. A shorter version appeared in Proceedings of the Tenth Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. City University of Hong Kong. 1995, (1997b). http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_scrambling.html. 07.12.1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, St. Yet another Paper about Partial Verb Phrase Fronting in German. Research Report RR-97-07, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz, Saarbrücken. A shorter version appeared in Proceedings of COLING 96, pages 800—805, (1997c). http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_pvp.html. 07.12.1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, St. Case in German — An HPSG Analysis. In: T. Kiss and D. Meurers, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop Current Topics in Constraint-based Theories of Germanic Syntax. DFKI GmbH und Universität des Saarlandes. Saarbrücken, 113–132, 1998a. http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_case.html. 07.12.1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, St. An HPSG-Analysis for Free Relative Clauses in German. Verbmobil Report 224, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz, Saarbrücken. A shorter version appeared in Proceedings of Formal Grammar, Aix-en-Provence, 19971998b. http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_freeRel.html. 07.12.1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, St. Deutsche Syntax deklarativ. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar für das Deutsche, No. 394 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, 1999. http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/Pub/e_hpsg.html. 07.12.1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenrieder, W. Von Subjekten, Sätzen und Subjektsätzen, No. 241 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C.J. and I.A. Sag. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, Volume 1: Fundamentals, No. 13 in CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information,1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C.J. and I.A. Sag. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Studies in Contemporary Linguistics. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, G.K. and A.M. Zwicky. Phonological Resolution of Syntactic Feature Conflict. Language 62(4): 751–773, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.R. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, MIT. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.R. Wem der Kasus schlägt. Linguistische Berichte 63: 26–32, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I.A. English Relative Clause Constructions. Journal of Linguistics 33(2): 431–484, 1997. ftp://ftp-csli.stanford.edu/linguistics/sag/rel-pap.ps.gz. 04.13.97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. Grundlagen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Walter de Gruyter & Co. 2. Auflage 1967, Berlin, 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uszkoreit, H. Constraints on Order. Linguistics 24: 883–906, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uszkoreit, H.Word Order and Constituent Structure in German, No. 8 in CSLI Lecture Notes. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noord, G. and G. Bouma. The Scope of Adjuncts and the Processing of Lexical Rules. In: Proceedings of COLING, 1994. Kyoto Japan, 250–256, 1994. http://grid.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/papers/coling94.ps.gz. 09.07.97.

  • Wahlster, W. 1993, Verbmobil Translation of Face-to-Face Dialogs. Research Report RR-93-34, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz, Saarbrücken. Appeared in: Proceedings des MT Summit IV, Kobe, Japan, July 1993, 127–135, 1993. http://www.dfki.unikl. de/~dfkidok/publications/RR/93/34/abstract.html. 03.13.98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, A. and L. Karttunen. Morphological Non-distinctiveness and Coordination. In: Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Vol. 1. 309–320, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Language Technology Lab, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, D-66123, Saarbrücken, Germany E-mail

    Stefan Müller

Authors
  1. Stefan Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, S. An HPSG-Analysis for Free Relative Clauses in German. Grammars 2, 53–105 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004564801304

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004564801304

Search

Navigation