Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology

  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanoscale science and engineering are providing unprecedented understanding and control over the basic building blocks of matter, leading to increased coherence in knowledge, technology, and education. The main reason for developing nanotechnology is to advance broad societal goals such as improved comprehension of nature, increased productivity, better healthcare, and extending the limits of sustainable development and of human potential. This paper outlines societal implication activities in nanotechnology R&D programs. The US National Nanotechnology Initiative annual investment in research with educational and societal implications is estimated at about $30 million (of which National Science Foundation (NSF) awards about $23 million including contributions to student fellowships), and in nanoscale research with relevance to environment at about $50 million (of which NSF awards about $30 million and EPA about $6 million). An appeal is made to researchers and funding organizations worldwide to take timely and responsible advantage of the new technology for economic and sustainable development, to initiate societal implications studies from the beginning of the nanotechnology programs, and to communicate effectively the goals and potential risks with research users and the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APEC, 2002. Nanotechnology - The Technology for the 21st Century, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Braach-Maksvytis V., 2002. Nanotechnology in Australia - towards a national initiative. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(1-2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge W.S., 2002. Public attitudes towards nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(6), 561–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai C., 2001. Progress of nanoscience and nanotechnology in China. J. Nanoparticle Res. 3(4), 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC, 2002. Sixth R&D Framework, Draft 6, November 2002, Brussels, Thematic Area 3 'Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials', Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA, 2002. Proc. nanotechnology and the environment: Applications and implications, Published Feb. 2003, Washington, DC, 83 pp., http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/ nano/GC ENV EPA2002 Proc 03-0204.pdf

  • Government of Japan, 2001. The Science and Technology Basic Plan (for 2001-2006), Tokyo, March 30.

  • Huang Z., H. Chen, A. Yip, G. Ng, F. Guo, Z.-K. Chen & M.C. Roco, 2003. Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field. J. Nanoparticle Res. 5(3-4).

  • Lee C.K., M.K. Wu & J.C. Yang, 2002. A catalyst to change everything: MEMS/NEMS - a paradigm in Taiwan's nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(5), 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J.W., 2002. Overview of nanotechnology in Korea - 10 year blueprint. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(6), 473–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnyusiwalla A., A.S. Daar & P.A. Singer, 2003. -Mind the gap': Science and ethics in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology, 14, R9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSF, 2002a. Proc. Nanogeoscience workshop, http://www. nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/geo workshop.pdf

  • NSF, 2002b. Proc. Nanoscale Science and Engineering Grantees Conference, Arlington, Virginia, http://www-unix. oit.umass.edu/%7Enano/

  • Roco M.C., 2002. Nanoscale science and engineering educational activities in the US. J. Nanoparticle Res. 4(3), 271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco M.C. & W. Bainbridge eds., 2001. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. National Science Foundation Report, (also Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 370 pp).

  • Roco M.C. & R. Tomellini eds., 2002. Nanotechnology revolutionary opportunities and societal implications. European Commission Report, Luxembourg, 205 pp.

  • Roco M.C., R.S. Williams & P. Alivisatos eds., 1999. -Nanotechnology research directions'. US National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C., (also Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000, 316 pp), http:// nano.gov

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco M.C., 2003. National nanotechnology investment in the fiscal year 2004 budget request by the President. AAAS Report 28: R&D in FY 2004, Washington, DC, pp. 255–264, http://nano.gov

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco M.C. & W.S. Bainbridge eds., 2002. -Converging technologies for improving human performance', National Science Foundation and Department of Commerce Report, (also Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2003; http://www.nsf.gov/nano).

  • Yamaguchi Y. & K. Komiyama, 2001. Structuring knowledge project in nanotechnology: Materials program launched in Japan. J. Nanoparticle Res. 3(2-3), 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF), 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230, USA

    M.C. Roco

  2. National Science and Technology Council's Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology, USA

    M.C. Roco

Authors
  1. M.C. Roco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roco, M. Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5, 181–189 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025548512438

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025548512438

Search

Navigation