Abstract
Doctoral students seeking faculty mentors have few tools available to assist them. The Ideal Mentor Scale (IMS) is a new measure designed to help graduate students consider the qualities they as individuals most value in a potential mentor. Ph.D. students at 3 different universities (Ns = 82, 250, 380) contributed to the development and cross-validation of the 34-item IMS. Item frequencies indicated that 2 universal qualities were central to graduate students' definitions of a mentor: communication skills and provision of feedback. Principal factor analysis of the IMS indicated that 3 individual differences dimensions reliably underlaid graduate students' importance ratings of mentor attributes: Integrity, Guidance, and Relationship. In one sample, Guidance and Relationship were significantly related to student satisfaction with their mentor. The IMS is an assessment tool that could individualize the initiation and maintenance of mentoring relationships, enhance communication, and ultimately improve the satisfaction of students with their doctoral education.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Norris, R. C., and Carter, F. J. (April 1984). The roles of mentors in the lives of graduate students. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Anderson, E. M., and Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. J. Teach. Educ. 39: 38–42.
Boyle, P., and Boice, B. (1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innov. Higher Educ. 22: 157–179.
Burke, R. J., and McKeen, C. A. (1996). Gender effects in mentoring relationships. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 11(5): 91–104.
Burlew, L. D. (1991). Multiple mentor model: A conceptual framework. J. Career Dev. 17: 213–221.
Busch, J. W. (1985). Mentoring in graduate schools of education: Mentors' perceptions. Am. Educ. Res. J. 22: 257–265.
Cesa, I. L., and Fraser, S. C. (1989). A method for encouraging the development of good mentor-protege relationships. Teach. Psychol. 16: 125–128.
Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
Cronan-Hillix, T., Gensheimer, L. K., Cronan-Hillix, W. A., and Davidson, W. S. (1986). Students' views of mentors in psychology graduate training. Teach. Psychol. 13: 123–127.
Everett, J. E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation. Multivariate Behav. Res. 18: 197–218.
Fielstein, L. L., Scoles, M. T., and Webb, K. J. (1992). Differences in traditional and nontraditonal students' preferences for advising services and perceptions of services recieved. NACADA J. 2: 5–12.
Fruchter, B. (1954). Introduction to Factor Analysis, D. Van Nostrand, New York.
Gilbert, L. A. (1985). Dimensions of same-gender student-faculty role-model relationships. Sex Roles 12: 111–123.
Green, S. G., and Bauer, T. N. (1995). Supervisory mentoring by advisers: Relationships with doctoral student potential, productivity, and commitment. Pers. Psychol. 48: 537–561.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Rev. Educ. Res. 61: 505–532.
Johnson, W. B. (August 2001). Creating a culture of mentoring: Recommendations for graduate programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
Katz, J., and Hartnett, R. T. (1976). Scholars in the Making: The Development of Graduate and Professional Students, Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA.
Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Acad. Manage. J. 26: 608–625.
LeCluyse, E. E., Tollefson, N., and Borgers, S. B. (1985). Differences in female graduate students in relation to mentoring. Coll. Stud. J. 19: 411–415.
Levinson, E. E., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., and McKee, B. (1978). The Seasons of a Man's Life, Ballantine Books, New York.
Loevinger, J. E. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychol. Rep. 3: 635–694.
Luna, G., and Cullen, D. (1998). Do graduate students need mentoring? Coll. Stud. J. 32: 322–330.
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Myers, D. G. (1987). Social psychology (2nd Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Pers. Psychol. 41: 457–479.
Roberts, G. C., and Sprague, R. L. (1995). To compete or to educate? Mentoring and the research climate. Prof. Ethics Rep. 8: 6–7.
Sands, R. G., Parson, L. A., and Duane, J. (1991). Faculty mentoring faculty in a public university. J. Higher Educ. 62: 174–193.
Scandura, T. A., and Katerberg, R. J. (August 1988). Much ado about mentors and little about measurement: Development of an instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
Scandura, T. A., and Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentoring in male-dominated occupations. J. Vocat. Behav. 43: 251–265.
Sorenson, G., and Kagan, D. (1967). Conflicts between doctoral candidates and their sponsors: A contrast in expectations. J. Higher Educ. 38: 17–24.
Sprague, R. L., Roberts, G. C., and Kavussanu, M. (March 1996). Sources of ethical beliefs in their discipline: Faculty vs. graduate students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, St. Louis, MO.
The University of Michigan Rackham School of Graduate Studies (1999). How to get the mentoring you want: A guide for graduate students at a diverse university. http:// www.rackham.umich.edu/StudentInfo/Publications/StudentMentoring/contents. html.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd Ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Wilde, J. B., and Schau, C. G. (1991). Mentoring in graduate schools of education: Mentees' perceptions. J. Exp. Educ. 59: 165–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, G.L. Enhancement of Mentor Selection Using the Ideal Mentor Scale. Research in Higher Education 44, 473–494 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024289000849
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024289000849