References
Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.
Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in nuclear medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003.
Shih W-J, Wierzbinski B. Cardiac SPECT: 360° circular acquisition may resolve defects of 180° data. J Nucl Med 2003;44:995–6.
Liu Y-H, Lam PT, Sinusas AJ, Wackers FJT. Differential effect of 180° and 360° acquisition orbits on the accuracy of SPECT imaging: quantitative evaluation in phantoms. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:1115–24.
Cao Z, Maunoury C, Chen CC, Holder LE. Comparison of continuous step-and-shoot versus step-and-shoot acquisition SPECT. J Nucl Med 1996;37:2037–40.
American College of Radiology Web site. Available from: URL: http://www.acr.org/s_acr/sec.asp?CID=1073&DID=1487. Accessed October 6, 2006.
Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Nuclear Medicine Laboratories Web site. Available from: URL: http://www.icanl.org. Accessed October 6, 2006.
American Association of Physicists in Medicine SPECT Task Group. Rotating scintillation camera SPECT acceptance testing and quality control. AAPM Report No. 22. New York: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 1987.
Nichols KJ, Galt JR. Quality control for SPECT imaging. In: DePuey EG, Berman DS, Garcia EV, editors. Cardiac SPECT imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 17–40.
National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 1-1994: performance measurements of scintillation cameras. Washington, DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1994.
Esser PD, Graham LS. A quality control program for nuclear medicine cameras. In: Henkin RE, et al. Nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2006. p. 246–56.
DePuey EG. How to detect and avoid myocardial perfusion SPECT artifacts. J Nucl Med 1994;35:699–702.
Galt JR, Faber T. Principles of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. In: Christian PE, Bernier DR, Langan JK, editors. Nuclear medicine and PET: technology and techniques. St Louis: Mosby; 2003. p. 242–84.
Cerqueira MD, Matsuoka D, Ritchie JL, Harp GD. The influence of collimators on SPECT center of rotation measurements: artifact generation and acceptance testing. J Nucl Med 1988;29:1393–7.
Hines H, Kayayan R, Colsher J, Hashimoto D, Shubert R, Fernando J, et al. National Electrical Manufacturers Association recommendation for implementing SPECT instrumentation quality control. J Nucl Med 2000;41:383–9.
Greer KL, Jaszczak RJ, Coleman RE. An overview of a camerabased SPECT system. Med Phys 1982;9:455–63.
National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 2-2001: performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Washington, DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2001.
National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 2-1994: performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Washington, DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1994.
Daube-Witherspoon ME, Karp JS, Casey ME, DiFilippo FP, Hines H, Muehllehner G, et al. PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1398–409.
International Electrotechnical Commission. Radionuclide imaging devices-characteristics and test conditions. Part 1: positron emission tomographs. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1998.
DePuey EG. Artifact is SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. In: DePuey EG, Berman DS, Garcia EV, editors. Cardiac SPECT imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 231–62.
National Electrical Manufacturers Association. The DICOM standard. Available from: URL: http://medical.nema.org/dicom/2004.html. Accessed October 6, 2006.
Nichols K, Yao SS, Kamran M, Faber TL, Cooke CD, DePuey EG. Clinical impact of arrhythmias on gated SPECT cardiac myocardial perfusion and function assessment. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:19–30.
Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Akincioglu C, Abidov A, Friedman JD, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:66–77.
Germano G, Nichols KJ, Cullom SJ, Faber TL, Cooke CD. Gated perfusion SPECT: technical considerations. In: DePuey EG, Berman DS, Garcia EV, editors. Cardiac SPECT imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 103–15.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nichols, K.J., Bacharach, S.L., Bergmann, S.R. et al. Instrumentation quality assurance and performance. J Nucl Cardiol 13, e25–e41 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.005
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.005