Abstract
Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate the quantitative properties of ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) on kinetic modeling with nitrogen 13 ammonia compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) in healthy subjects.
Methods and Results. Cardiac N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) studies from 20 normal volunteers at rest and during dipyridamole stimulation were analyzed. Image data were reconstructed with either FBP or OSEM. FBP- and OSEM-derived input functions and tissue curves were compared together with the myocardial blood flow and spillover values. The late area under the OSEM input functions during dipyridamole is overestimated by 30% (P<.0001) relative to FBP. Conversely, the area under the late part of the OSEM tissue curves is underestimated by 20% (P<.0001) compared with FBP during both rest and dipyridamole. These differences in tissue and input functions cause the resting myocardial blood flow to be underestimated by 15% (P<.0001). During dipyridamole, the OSEM flow is underestimated by 25% (P<.0001) relative to FBP, causing the myocardial flow reserve to be underestimated by 10% (P<.0001). Large inter-regional differences in FBP and OSEM flow values were observed with a flow underestimation of 45% (rest/dipyridamole) in the septum and of 5% (rest) and 15% (dipyridamole) in the lateral myocardial wall.
Conclusions. OSEM reconstruction of myocardial perfusion images with N-13 ammonia and PET produces high-quality images for visual interpretation. However, compared with FBP, OSEM is associated with substantial underestimation of perfusion on quantitative imaging. Our findings indicate that OSEM should be used with precaution in clinical PET studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang SC, Buxton D, Gambhir SS, Hansen H, et al. Quantitation of regional myocardial blood flow using 13Nammonia and reoriented dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. Circulation 1992;86:1004–17.
Bol A, Melin JA, Vanoverschelde J-L, Baudhuin T, Vogelaers D, De Pauw M, et al. Direct comparison of [13N] ammonia and [15O] water estimates of perfusion with quantification of regional myocardial blood flow by microspheres. Circulation 1993;87:512–25.
Nitzsche EU, Choi Y, Czernin J, Hoh CK, Huang SC, Schelbert HR. Noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow in humans. A direct comparison of the [13N]ammonia and the [15O]water techniques. Circulation 1996;93:2000–6.
Shepp LA, Vardi Y. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1982;1:113–22.
Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:601–9.
Reader AJ, Visvikis D, Erlandsson K, Ott RJ, Flower MA. Intercomparison of four reconstruction techniques for positron volume imaging with rotating planar detectors. Phys Med Biol 1998;43:823–34.
Lonneux M, Borbath I, Bol A, Coppens A, Sibomana M, Bausart R, et al. Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: The role of statistical reconstruction. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:591–8.
Katoh C, Ruotsalainen U, Laine H, Alenius S, Iida H, Nuutila P, et al. Iterative reconstruction based on median root prior in quantification of myocardial blood flow and oxygen metabolism. J Nucl Med 1999;40:862–7.
Boellaard R, van Lingen A, Lammertsma AA. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: Quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. J Nucl Med 2001;42:808–17.
Nyboe J, Jensen G, Appleyard M, Schnohr P. Risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in Copenhagen. I: Hereditary, educational and socioeconomic factors. Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J 1989;10:910–6.
DeGrado TR, Turkington TG, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE. Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med 1994;35:1398–406.
Hove JD, Iida H, Kofoed KF, Freiberg J, Holm S, Kelbaek H. Left atrial versus left ventricular input function for quantification of the myocardial blood flow with nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:71–6.
Kofoed KF, Hove JD, Freiberg J, Høst U, Hesse B, Kelbæk H. Relationship between regional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 13N ammonia uptake in normal myocardium assessed by positron emission tomography. Patterns of mismatch and effects of aging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2001;17:361–70.
Hoffman EJ, Huang S-C, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: I. Effect of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979;3:299–308.
Krivokapich J, Smith GT, Huang SC, Hoffman EJ, Ratib O, Phelps ME, et al. N-13 ammonia myocardial imaging at rest and with exercise in normal volunteers: Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion with dynamic positron emission tomography. Circulation 1989;80:1328–37.
Smith GT, Huang SC, Nienaber CA, Krivokapich J, Schelbert HR. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with N-13 ammonia and dynamic PET [abstract]. J Nucl Med 1988;29:940.
Hove JD, Gambhir SS, Kofoed KF, Freiberg J, Kelbaek H. Quantitation of the regional blood flow in the interventricular septum using positron emission tomography and nitrogen-13 ammonia. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:109–16.
Hove JD, Gambhir SS, Kofoed KF, Kelbæk H, Schelbert HR, Phelps M. Dual spillover problem in the myocardial septum with nitrogen-13-ammonia flow quantitation. J Nucl Med 1998;39:591–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An abstract of this article was presented at the 6th International Conference of Nuclear Medicine, Florence 2003, April 29–May 1, 2003.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hove, J.D., Rasmussen, R., Freiberg, J. et al. Clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (ordered-subset expectation maximization) in dynamic positron emission tomography: Quantitative effects on kinetic modeling with N-13 ammonia in healthy subjects. J Nucl Cardiol 15, 530–534 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.034
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.034