Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The role of pro-women institutions in addressing violence reports against women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Public Policy and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Violence against women is a major public health and human rights problem. In response, countries have sought to empower and support victims and strengthen violence prevention by promoting the creation of several pro-women institutions, such as a city council for women’s rights, a women’s police station, and a shelter for women facing violence. However, we know little about how these pro-women institutions affect reporting cases of violence against women. This study tests the reporting effects of an integrative framework that includes pro-women institutions, economic, demographic, cultural, political, and symbolic representation factors. The analysis relies on data derived from the 496 municipalities of the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. Violence against women is captured with reporting of (a) serious threats, (b) personal injury, (c) rape, (d) attempted murder, and (e) murder. Results seem to be contingent on the types of reporting cases and pro-women institutions. Having a police station for women issues boosts reporting cases of personal injury, and the presence of a public defender officer for women increases reporting cases of serious threats and attempted murder. Results suggest local pro-minority institutions seem to enhance government responsiveness by addressing their demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: Munic data base (IBGE 2017)

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To create a police station for women issues, the state judiciary secretary decides whether new units should be created and in which municipalities. From there, state officials negotiate with municipal officials to implement the creation process. Certainly, the municipal interest and politicians’ and managers’ will influence this process.

References

  • Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847–1859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhabib, S., Nur, U., & Jones, R. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg, D., Rainer, H., Wadsworth, J., & Wilson, T. (2013). Unemployment and domestic violence: theory and evidence (p. 7515). Bonn: IZA. Discussion Paper Series, n.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R., & Johnston Miller, K. (2013). Representative bureaucracy, gender and policing: The case of domestic violence arrests. Public Administration, 91(4), 998–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avdeyeva, O. (2009). Enlarging the club: When do states enforce gender equality laws? Comparative European Politics, 7(1), 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, M., Bedi, A., & Chhachhi, A. (2009). Marital violence and women’s employment and property status: evidence from north Indian villages (p. 4361). Bonn: IZA. Discussion Paper Series, n.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, K., & Khor, D. (1993). Toward an integration of theory and research on the status of women. Gender & Society, 7(2), 347–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. (2006). Delegacias Especializadas de Atendimento à Mulher (DEAMs) [Specialized Police Stations for Women]. Norma Técnica de Padronização [Technical Norm for Standardization]. Brasília: Secretaria de Políticas para as Mulheres – Presidência da República [Secretariat of Policies for Women - Presidency of the Republic].

  • Brasil. (2011). Pacto Nacional pelo Enfrentamento à Violência contra as Mulheres [National Pact to Combat Violence against Women]. Brasília: Secretaria de Políticas para as Mulheres – Presidência da República [Secretariat of Policies for Women - Presidency of the Republic].

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calazans, M., Cortés, I. (2011). O processo de criação, aprovação e implementação da Lei Maria da Penha [The process of creating, approving and implementing the Maria da Penha Law]. In: Campos, C. H. (Org.). Brasil. Lei Maria da Penha comentada em uma perspectiva jurídico-feminista. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Yuris.

  • Cerqueira, D., Moura, R., & Pasinato, W. (2019). Participação no mercado de trabalho e violência doméstica contra as mulheres no Brasil (p. 2501). Texto para Discussão n: Brasília, IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Ullman, S. (2010). Women’s reporting of sexual and physical assaults to police in the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 16(3), 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devries, K., Mak, J., García-Moreno, C., Petzold, M., Child, J., Falder, J., et al. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 340(28), 1527–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douki, S., Nacef, F., Belhadj, A., Bouasker, A., & Ghachem, R. (2003). Violence against women in Arab and Islamic countries. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 6(3), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, K., Palmer, M., & Glick, D. (2018). Who participates in local government? evidence from meeting minutes. Perspective on Politics, 17(1), 28–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, M., & Emmelin, M. (2014). Intimate partner violence and mental health. Global Health Action,. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., Peña, R., Agurto, S., & Winkvist, A. (2001). Researching domestic violence against women: Methodological and ethical considerations. Studies in Family Planning, 32(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1997). An economic analysis of domestic violence. Review of Social Economy, 55(3), 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, M., & Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S. (2010). Explaining domestic violence policy outcomes in Chile and Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society, 52(3), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. (1993). Through a sociological lens: Social structure and family violence. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 31–46). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, S. (2010). Promoting gender equality: the role of ideology, power, and control in the link between land ownership and violence in Nicaragua. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), 146–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, K., Tarzia, L., Valpied, J., et al. (2019). An online healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence (I-DECIDE): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Public Health, 4, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, Lori. (1998). Violence against woman. An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3): 262–290.

  • Hetling, A. (2000). Addressing domestic violence as a barrier to self-sufficiency: The relationship of welfare receipt and spousal abuse. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 11, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S. E., & McLean, W. P. (2001). Performance and race in evaluating minority mayors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(3), 321–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Htun, M., & Weldon, L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women from a global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. (2019). Cidades e Estados. Brasília: IBGE. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rs/panorama

  • Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA. (2019). Atlas da Violência 2019. Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. Brasília: IPEA.

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics] (2017) Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais - MUNIC [Basic Municipal Information Survey]. MUNIC 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/saude/10586-pesquisa-deinformacoes-basicas-municipais.html?edicao=21632&t=sobre Acessed 22 Nov 2019.

  • Jewkes, R., & Dartnall, E. (2019). More research is needed on digital technologies in violence against women. Lancet Public Health, 4, 270–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R., & Newman, M. (2001). The Gendered bureaucracy: Agency mission, equality of opportunity, and representative bureaucracies. Women and Politics, 23(3), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D. (2004). What is violence against women? defining and measuring the problem. J Interpersonal Violence, 19(11), 1209–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M., & Khorshed, A. (2003). Women’s status and domestic violence in rural Bangladesh: individual and community-level effects. Demography, 40(2), 269–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziol-McLain, J., Vandal, A., Wilson, D., et al. (2018). Efficacy of a web-based safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res, 19, 426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krislov, S., & Rosenbloom, D. (1981). Representative bureaucracy and the American Political System. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievori, D. (2003). Non-reporting and hidden recording of sexual assault: An international review. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciel, A., Alarcon, A., & Gimenes, É. (2017). Partidos políticos e espectro ideológico: Parlamentares, especialistas, esquerda e direita no Brasil [Political parties and ideological spectrum: Parliamentarians, specialists, left and right wing in Brazil]. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Política, 8(3), 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, C. A. (2012). Regret and police reporting among individuals who have experienced sexual assault. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 18(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, F. (2001). Attitudes and family violence: Linking intergenerational and cultural theories. Journal of Family Violence, 16(2), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, M. J., Wiebe, E., Marion, S., & Livingstone, C. (2000). Why don’t more women report sexual assault to the police? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(5), 659–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 850–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., & Segal, C. (2019). Do female officers improve law enforcement quality? Effects on crime reporting and domestic violence. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(5), 2220–2247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, F. (1982). Democracy and the Public Service (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, B., Matsuo, H., McIntyre, K., & Morrison, N. (2005). Attitudes toward victims of rape: Effects of gender, race, religion, and social class. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(6), 725–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, A. C. (2017). Análise de arranjos de implementação de políticas públicas de enfrentamento à violência contra mulheres em municípios de pequeno porte [Analysis of public policy implementation arrangements to combat violence against women in small municipalities]. Revista do Serviço Público, 68(3), 503–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliart, P. (2008). Indigenous Women’s Organizations and the Political Discourses of Indigenous Rights and Gender Equity in Peru. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 3(3), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitanguy, J. (2003). A questão de gênero no Brasil [The gender issue in Brazil]. Estudo, Pesquisa, Informação e Ação: CEPIA - Cidadania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prado, D.; Sanematsu, M. (2017). Feminicídio: #InvisibilidadeMata [Feminicide: #InvisibilityKills]. Fundação Rosa Luxemburgo. São Paulo: Instituto Patrícia Galvão.

  • Riger, S., & Gordon, M. (1981). The fear of rape: A study in social control. Journal of Social Issues, 37(3), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senado Federal [Federal Senate] (2019) Procuradoria Especial da Mulher [Special Women's Attorney]. Retrieved from: https://www12.senado.leg.br/institucional/procuradoria/violencia Acessed 7 Nov 2019.

  • Smith, M. (1994). Enhancing the quality of survey data on violence against women: A feminist approach. Gender and Social, 8(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. A. (1990). Everyday violence: How women and men experience sexual and physical danger. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C., & Stoker, R. (2015). Urban neighborhoods in a new era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thielemann, G., & Stewart, J. (1996). A demand-side perspective on the importance of representative bureaucracy: AIDS, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. Public Administration Review, 56(2), 168–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribunal Superior Eleitoral – TSE. (2020). Partidos políticos registrados [Registered political parties]. Retrieved from: http://www.tse.jus.br/partidos/partidos-politicos/registrados-no-tse Accessed May 5, 2020.

  • Tribunal Regional Eleitoral do Rio Grande do Sul – TER/RS. (2019). Resultado das eleições [Result of the elections]. Retrieved from: http://www.tre-rs.jus.br/eleicoes/resultados-das-eleicoes Accessed November 7, 2019.

  • United Nations - UN. (1993) Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). Proceedings of the 85th plenary meeting, Geneva.

  • Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, C., & Zimmerman, C. (2002). Violence against women: Global scope and magnitude. The Lancet, 359(9313), 1232–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, V. M. (2006). Exploring the causal story: Gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, V. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2004). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Uyen, L., Hobart, M., & Kernic, M. (2003). Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18(2), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization - WHO. (2002). WHO Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization - WHO. (2003). Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence. Geneva: The World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodanis, C. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women, and fear. A cross-national test of the feminist theory of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(6), 655–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, J. M., Newmark, L., Raja, D., & Denver, M. (2014). Sexual assault, medical forensic exams and VAWA. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Brasilia, Management Program, Brasilia, Brazil

    Adalmir Oliveira Gomes

  2. O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Claudia N. Avellaneda

Authors
  1. Adalmir Oliveira Gomes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia N. Avellaneda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia N. Avellaneda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Communicated by Yijia Jing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gomes, A.O., Avellaneda, C.N. The role of pro-women institutions in addressing violence reports against women. GPPG 1, 39–60 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00003-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00003-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation