Abstract
Purpose
Much is known about growth and nutrient uptake traits and ecological stoichiometry in natural systems. However, these concepts have been comparatively understudied in agricultural systems despite their potential to infer nutrient limitation and interspecific resource competition.
Methods
This study established a model mixed pasture system to assess tissue C:N and C:P stoichiometry and aboveground biomass (AGB) in a grass (Phalaris aquatica) and legume (Trifolium vesiculosum) under factorial inputs of high and low nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), in monoculture and mixture. Due to inherent trait diversity, we expected grass and legume growth, shoot vs root stoichiometry and N:P homeostasis to differ in response to nutrient limitation and between monoculture and mixture.
Results
Grass AGB was greater with N addition and in mixture, and legume AGB was decreased by N but increased by P, more so in mixture. Nutrient limitation in grass was determined via a strong coupling of growth with shoot stoichiometry, by which AGB decreased and C:N increased under N limitation. Legume growth was not correlated with tissue stoichiometry, but potential for growth limitation by N and P was detected via increased shoot C:N under low N and P, and C:P under low P. Legume shoot N:P was more homeostatic than grass, and grass shoot N:P homeostasis was greater in mixtures than in monocultures.
Conclusions
Integrating ecological stoichiometry alongside trait-based ecology is a useful tool for predicting how fertiliser management may affect nutrient balance and species dominance in mixed pasture agroecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
Data and material for this manuscript are available publicly at https://doi.org/10.25909/12895121.
Code Availability
No custom code was produced for this manuscript.
References
Agnusdei MG, Assuero SG, Lattanzi FA, Marino MA (2010) Critical N concentration can vary with growth conditions in forage grasses: implications for plant N status assessment and N deficiency diagnosis. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88:215–230
Ågren G (2008) Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:153
Ågren GI (1988) Ideal nutrient productivities and nutrient proportions in plant growth. Plant, Cell Environ 11:613–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01803.x
Ågren GI (2004) The C:N: P stoichiometry of autotrophs–theory and observations. Ecol Lett 7:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00567.x
Amato M, Jackson R, Butler J, Ladd J (1984) Decomposition of plant material in Australian soils. II. Residual organic N from legume plant parts decomposing under field and laboratory conditions. Soil Research 22:331–341. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9840331
Ansquer P, Duru M, Theau JP, Cruz P (2008) Functional traits as indicators of fodder provision over a short time scale in species-rich grasslands. Ann Bot 103:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn215AnnalsofBotany
Ashton IW, Miller AE, Bowman WD, Suding KN (2010) Niche complementarity due to plasticity in resource use: plant partitioning of chemical N forms. Ecology 91:3252–3260. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1849.1
Ball KR, Power SA, Brien C, Woodin S, Jewell N, Berger B, Pendall E (2020) High-throughput, image-based phenotyping reveals nutrient-dependent growth facilitation in a grass-legume mixture. PloS one 15:e0239673.
Bingcheng X, Weizhou X, Zhi W, Zhifei C, Jairo AP, Yinglong C (2018) Accumulation of N and P in the legume Lespedeza davurica in controlled mixtures with the grass Bothriochloa ischaemum under varying water and fertilization conditions. Front Plant Sci 9.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00165
Bracken MES, Hillebrand H, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Cebrian J, Cleland EE, Elser JJ, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Smith JE (2015) Signatures of nutrient limitation and co-limitation: responses of autotroph internal nutrient concentrations to nitrogen and phosphorus additions. Oikos 124:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01215
Brar GS, Gomez JF, McMichael BL, Matches AG, Taylor HM (1991) Germination of twenty forage legumes as influenced by temperature. Agron J 83:173–175. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300010040x
Brien CJ (2018) imageData: aids in processing and plotting data from a Lemna-Tec Scananalyzer. http://cran.at.r-project.org/package=imageData accessed February 6, 2018
Brien CJ (2019) asremlPlus: augments ASReml-R in fitting mixed models and packages generally in exploring prediction differences. R package version 4.1–28. https://cran.at.r-project.org/package=asremlPlus Accessed June 17, 2019
Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) Analysis of mixed models for S language environments: ASReml-R reference manual. DPI Publications, Brisbane
Castellanos AE, Llano-Sotelo JM, Machado-Encinas LI, López-Piña JE, Romo-Leon JR, Sardans J, Peñuelas JJPE (2018) Foliar C, N, and P stoichiometry characterize successful plant ecological strategies in the Sonoran Desert. 219:775–788. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0833-3
Chalk PM, Ladha JK (1999) Estimation of legume symbiotic dependence: an evaluation of techniques based on 15N dilution. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1901–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00095-4
Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260
Chapin FS (1991) Integrated responses of plants to stress. Bioscience 41:29–36
Craine J, Jackson R (2010) Plant nitrogen and phosphorus limitation in 98 North American grassland soils. Plant Soil 334:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0237-1
Crous KY, Ósvaldsson A, Ellsworth DS (2015) Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilisation stimulates stem growth. Plant Soil 391:293–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2426-4
Del Pozo A, Garnier E, Aronson J (2000) Contrasted nitrogen utilization in annual C3 grass and legume crops: physiological explorations and ecological considerations. Acta Oecologica 21:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(00)00113-2
Droop M (1973) Some thoughts on nutrient limitation in algae. J Phycol 9:264–272
Duru M, Ducrocq H (1996) A nitrogen and phosphorus herbage nutrient index as a tool for assessing the effect of N and P supply on the dry matter yield of permanent pastures. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47:59–69
Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Markow T, Watts T, Hobbie S, Fagan W, Schade J, Hood J, Sterner RW (2003) Growth rate–stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6:936–943. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00518.x
Elser JJ, Urabe J (1999) The stoichiometry of consumer-driven nutrient cycling: theory, observations and consequences. Ecology 80:735–751. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0735:TSOCDN]2.0.CO;2
Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002) Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295:1517. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066360
Evers GW (1982) Seedling Growth and Nodulation of arrowleaf, crimson, and subterranean clovers. 74:629–632. doi:https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400040010x
Freya MT, Peter AV (2017) Are trait-growth models transferable? Predicting multi-species growth trajectories between ecosystems using plant functional traits. PLoS ONE 12:e0176959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176959
Gleeson S, Tilman D (1994) Plant allocation, growth rate and successional status. Functional Ecology:543–550.
Graham JJCaimr (2000) Assessing costs of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in agroecosystems.127–140.
Graham PH, Vance CP (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. 131:872–877. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.017004 %J Plant Physiology
Guo Y, Yang X, Schöb C, Jiang Y, Tang Z (2017) Legume shrubs are more nitrogen-homeostatic than non-legume shrubs. Front Plant Sci 8.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01662
Haling RE, Campbell CD, Tighe MK, Guppy CN (2013) Effect of competition from a C4 grass on the phosphorus response of a subtropical legume. Crop Pasture Sci 64:985–992. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13275
Haynes R (1980) Competitive aspects of the grass-legume association. Advances in agronomy. Elsevier. pp 227–261
He J-S, Wang X, Flynn DFB, Wang L, Schmid B, Fang J (2009) Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and environmental trade-offs between leaf productivity and persistence. Ecology 90:2779–2791. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1126.1
Heichel GH, Henjum KI (1991) Dinitrogen fixation, nitrogen transfer, and productivity of forage legume-grass communities. Crop Sci 31(1):202–208. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100010045x
Hessen DO, Ågren GI, Anderson TR, Elser JJ, Ruiter PCd (2004) Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: the role of stoichiometry. Ecology 85:1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0251
Hilbert D (1990) Optimization of plant root: shoot ratios and internal nitrogen concentration. Ann Bot 66:91–99
Johnson JM-F, Barbour NW, Weyers SL (2007) Chemical composition of crop biomass impacts its decomposition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:155–162. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0419
Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2004) Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a biological model in the study of plant invasions. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:415–429
Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2006) Control strategies for the invasive reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in North American wetlands: the need for an integrated management plan. Nat Areas J 26:208–214
Ledgard SF, Steele KWJP, Soil (1992) Biological nitrogen fixation in mixed legume/grass pastures. 141:137–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00011314
Mendoza R, Bailleres M, García I, Ruiz O (2016a) Phosphorus fertilization of a grass-legume mixture: effect on plant growth, nutrients acquisition and symbiotic associations with soil microorganisms. J Plant Nutr 39:691–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1087032
Mendoza R, Garcia I, Depalma D, Lopez CF (2016b) Competition and growth of a grass and legume mixture fertilised with nitrogen and phosphorus: effect on nutrient acquisition, root morphology and symbiosis with soil microorganisms. Crop Pasture Sci 67:629–640. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP15257
Meunier CL, Malzahn AM, Boersma MJPO (2014) A new approach to homeostatic regulation: towards a unified view of physiological and ecological concepts. 9:e107737.
Minden V, Kleyer M (2014) Internal and external regulation of plant organ stoichiometry. Plant Biol 16:897–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12155
Nasto MK, Osborne BB, Lekberg Y, Asner GP, Balzotti CS, Porder S, Taylor PG, Townsend AR, Cleveland CC (2017) Nutrient acquisition, soil phosphorus partitioning and competition among trees in a lowland tropical rain forest. New Phytol 214:1506–1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14494
Nyfeler D, Huguenin-Elie O, Suter M, Frossard E, Connolly J, Lüscher A (2009) Strong Mixture Effects among Four Species in Fertilized Agricultural Grassland Led to Persistent and Consistent Transgressive Overyielding 46:683–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01653.x
Nyfeler D, Huguenin-Elie O, Suter M, Frossard E, Lüscher A (2011) Grass–legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources. Agr Ecosyst Environ 140:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.022
Olsen SR (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department Of Agriculture, Washington
Peoples MB, Chalk PM, Unkovich MJ, Boddey RM (2015) Can differences in 15N natural abundance be used to quantify the transfer of nitrogen from legumes to neighbouring non-legume plant species? Soil Biol Biochem 87:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.010
Poorter H, Lambers H, Evans JR (2014) Trait correlation networks: a whole-plant perspective on the recently criticized leaf economic spectrum. New Phytol 201:378–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12547
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Reich PB (2014) The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. 102:275–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12211
Ryser P, Lambers H (1995) Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast-and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply. Plant Soil 170:251–265
Schomberg H, Weaver RJAj (1992) Nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and early growth of arrowleaf clover in response to root temperature and starter nitrogen. 84:1046–1050.
Siebenkäs A, Schumacher J, Roscher C (2015) Phenotypic plasticity to light and nutrient availability alters functional trait ranking across eight perennial grassland species. AoB Plants 7.https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv029
Sterner RW (2002) Ecological stoichiometry : the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, Princeton
Thornley J (1991) A transport-resistance model of forest growth and partitioning. Ann Bot 68:211–226
Vardien W, Steenkamp ET, Valentine AJ (2016) Legume nodules from nutrient-poor soils exhibit high plasticity of cellular phosphorus recycling and conservation during variable phosphorus supply. J Plant Physiol 191:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2015.12.002
Warembourg F, Roumet C, Lafont F (2003) Differences in rhizosphere carbon-partitioning among plant species of different families. Plant Soil 256:347–357
Watson R, McDonald W, Bourke C (2000) Agfact P2.5.1. Phalaris pastures. N.S.W. Department of Primary Industries. p 32
Wendling M, Büchi L, Amossé C, Jeangros B, Walter A, Charles R (2017) Specific interactions leading to transgressive overyielding in cover crop mixtures. Agr Ecosyst Environ 241:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.003
Whitaker D, Williams ER, John JA (2002) CycDesigN: a package for the computer generation of experimental designs. 2.0 edn. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
Wilcox RR, Muska J (2002) Comparing correlation coefficients. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 31:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1081/SAC-9687281
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827
Yu Q, Elser J, He N, Wu H, Chen Q, Zhang G, Han X (2011) Stoichiometric homeostasis of vascular plants in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Oecologia 166:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1902-z
Funding
Funding for this project was provided by an Australian Plant Phenomics Facility postgraduate award to Kirsten Ball. Additional funds were provided by an Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship from the University of Western Sydney.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KB designed and managed the experiment, performed statistical analyses, and wrote the manuscript. SW consulted on the experimental design and directed the development of the manuscript. SP and EP supervised the progress of the experimental design and statistical analyses and directed the development of the manuscript. BB consulted on experimental design, managed the experiment and directed the development of the manuscript. CB produced the experimental design, performed the linear mixed model analyses and consulted on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
The authors wish to recognize that this study was conducted at the University of Adelaide on the traditional lands of the Kaurna people.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ball, K.R., Woodin, S.J., Power, S.A. et al. Integrating Ecological Stoichiometry to Understand Nutrient Limitation and Potential for Competition in Mixed Pasture Assemblages. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21, 2489–2500 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00539-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00539-4