Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential of nature-based solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from US agriculture

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Socio-Ecological Practice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change is the main environmental challenge of the twenty-first century. The United States is the world’s second-largest producer of annual greenhouse gases (GHGs), and agriculture contributes about 10% of the USA’s emissions. This study evaluates the literature and potential of nature-based solutions to reduce GHG emissions from US agriculture, which has been characterized as “industrial agriculture.” The US experience has global relevance. Nature-based solutions in US agriculture include: (1) changing the crops and livestock that farmers produce; (2) changing how farmers grow food by using regenerative or climate-smart agriculture practices, such as soil and water conservation and improved manure and fertilizer management to build up soil carbon and enhance productivity; (3) changing where food is grown; (4) enabling the sale of carbon offset credits from farmland owners to GHG emitters; and (5) enabling the sale of development rights by farmland owners to “preserve” farmland for agricultural uses and avoid the conversion of farmland to residential and commercial development. The potential reductions in GHG emissions from nature-based solutions appear to be 40–50%. So, nature-based solutions will not eliminate all GHGs from US agriculture. But the reduction in methane and nitrous oxide are especially important. The global challenge is how to profitably produce more food to feed a growing population while sustainably reducing GHGs and improving soil carbon health within a changing climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

There was no funding support for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TLD is the sole author and provided the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by TLD. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TLD and he alone commented on previous versions of the manuscript. TLD read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas L. Daniels.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest or financial interest in the creation of this manuscript. There was no research sponsor. Further, as an editorial board member of Socio-Ecological Practice Research, the author was not involved in the peer-review or handling of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daniels, T.L. The potential of nature-based solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from US agriculture. Socio Ecol Pract Res 4, 251–265 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00120-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00120-y

Keywords

Navigation