Skip to main content
Log in

Reviews and Prospect of International Electromagnetic Seismic Satellite

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large number of space-to-earth observation results show that there is a clear correlation between the space electromagnetic disturbances and the occurrence of earthquakes. So, the application of satellite to capture electromagnetic precursors is one of the most effective means of short-term and impending earthquake prediction, which promotes the development of electromagnetic seismic satellites. Some countries have carried out satellite observations of space electromagnetic phenomena one after another. The phenomena of space electromagnetic anomalies observed before the earthquake were reported. In recent years, the international electromagnetic seismic satellite project mainly includes: PREDVESTNIK-E, COMPASS-II, QUAKESAT, DEMETER, etc. In this paper, the current status of the international electromagnetic seismic satellites in orbit is investigated. The management mission characteristics of electromagnetic seismic satellites are analyzed and summarized. The development plan of satellite projects in the field of electromagnetic earthquake monitoring is investigated. The development trend of satellite application in earthquake disaster monitoring is prospected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ouyang Xin Yan J (2007) Brief introduction of earthquake electromagnetic satellite observation physical quantities. Recem Dev World Seismol 344:54–58

  2. E. http://m.look.360.cn/transcoding?url=2s22ui0vdna&sign=360_e39369d1&from=singlemessage

  3. E. https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/kompass.htm

  4. Kuznetsov VD, Bodnar L, Garipov GK, Kapustina OV, Korepanov VE, Mikhailov YuM, Pavlov NN, Panasuyk MI, Prutenskii IS, Rubinshtein IA, Ruzhin Yu Ya, Sinelnikov VM, Tulupov VI, Ferents Ch, Shirokov AV, Yashin IV (2011) Orbital monitoring of the ionosphere and abnormal phenomena by the small Vulkan_Compass_2 Satellite, published. Geomagn Aeron 51:333–345

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/quakesat-1.htm

  6. Kainov V, Thoby M, Thoby J, Silkin O, Solovey V (2006) The DEMETER micro satellite launch campaign: a cheap access to space. Adv Space Res 37:754–760

  7. Okean-Okean-O1/Okean-O/Sich series (2015) spacecraft- earth observation, IHS Jane's Space Systems and Industry, Ukraine

  8. Cluster, Jane's Space Systems and Industry (2013) IHS Jane's spacecraft scientific, International

  9. Walsh AP, Forsyth C, Fazakerley AN, Chen CHK, Lucek EA, Davies JA, Perry CH, Walker SN, Balikhin MA (2010) 10 years of the Cluster mission. Astronomy Geophys 51:5.33–5.36

  10. http://astrogeo.oxfordjournals.org/Shanghai Jiao Tong University on December 6, 2014

  11. Credland J, Mecke G, Ellwood J (1997) The cluster mission: ESA’S space fleet to the magnetosphere. Space Sci Rev 79:33–64

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiori JRAD, Boteler DH, Koustov AV, Knudsen D, Burchill JK (2014) Investigation of localized 2D convection mapping based on artificially generated Swarm ion drift data. J Atmos Solar-Terrestrial Phys 114:30–41

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Friis-Christensen JE, Lühr H, Knudsen D, Haagmans R (2008) Swarm—an earth observation mission investigating geospace. Adv Space Res 41:210–216

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/swarm.htm

  15. Pignède M, Morales J, Fritzen P, Lewis J (2010) Swarm Constellation Simulator, Space Ops 2010 Conference, AIAA, Huntsville, Alabama, 25–30 April 2010

  16. E. http://m.look.360.cn/transcoding?url=2s22ui0vdna&sign=360_e39369d1&from=singlemessage

  17. Wang Xizhen J, Yuntian T, Xiaomei W, Xun Z (2008) International seismoelectromagnetic satellite development status and trend. Int Space 9:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  18. Belyaevq VA, Burger WA, Cafagnak A, Cipolloneb P, Consolinim G, Contil L, Continh A, De Angelism E, De Donatob C, De Franceschin G, De Santisn A, De Santisb C, Diegom P, Durantec M, Fornarol C, Guandalinid C, Laurentih G, Laurenzam M, Lazzizzerak I, Lollid M, Maneac C, Marcellib L, Marcuccim F, Masciantoniob G, Osteriaf G, Palmab F, Palmonarid F, Panicof B, Patriziid L, Picozzaj P, Pozzatod M, Rashevskayac I, Riccie M, Rovitusoc M, Scottif V, Sotgiub A, Sparvolij R, Spataroe B, Spoglin L, Tommasinoc F, Ubertinim P, Vannaronil G, Xuhuip S, Zoffolia S (2017) The HEPD particle detector and the EFD electric field detector for the CSES Satellite. Radiat Phys Chem 137:187–192

  19. Global earthquake satellite system (GESS) (2003) https://solidearth.jpl.nasa.gov/GESS/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaopeng Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Zhuang, H., Yang, G. et al. Reviews and Prospect of International Electromagnetic Seismic Satellite. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. Technol. 1, 243–253 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-018-0021-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-018-0021-5

Keywords

Navigation