Skip to main content
Log in

LMI-based linear parameter varying PID control design and its application to an aircraft control system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To bridge the gap between real-world applications and theoretical achievements, this paper proposes a new synthesis approach of gain-scheduled proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control for linear parameter-varying (LPV) systems. It is recognized that the synthesis problem of PID controllers for LPV systems should be formulated as nonconvex optimization problems. To avoid this situation, using a special matrix transformation, novel synthesis conditions with linear matrix inequality constraints are provided in this paper. The stability of the resulting closed-loop system is guaranteed theoretically based on a parameter-dependent Lyapunov function, and two types of robust performance (bounded \(L_2\) norm and induced \(L_2\) norm) are also achieved in the corresponding synthesis conditions. Then, the control system of aircraft is designed based on the proposed method, and the system responses are compared with the traditional LPV-PID control and the LPV dynamic output feedback control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hoffmann C, Werner H (2015) A survey of linear parameter-varying control applications validated by experiments or high-fidelity simulations. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 23(2):416–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shamma JS, Athans M (1990) Analysis of gain scheduled control for nonlinear plants. IEEE Trans Autom Control 35(8):898–907

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker G, Packard A (1994) Robust performance of linear parametrically varying systems using parametrically-dependent linear feedback. Syst Control Lett 23(3):205–215

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu F, Yang XH, Packard A, Becker G (1996) Induced \({L_2}\) norm control for LPV systems with bounded parameter variation rates. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 6(9–10):983–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Apkarian P, Gahinet P, Becker G (1995) Self-scheduled \({H_\infty }\)control of linear parameter-varying systems: a design example. Automatica 31(9):1251–1261

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Packard A (1994) Gain scheduling via linear fractional transformations. Syst Control Lett 22(2):79–92

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. He X, Zhao J (2014) Multiple lyapunov functions with blending for induced L2-norm control of switched LPV systems and its application to an F-16 aircraft model. Asian J Control 16(1):149–161

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Vesel V, Ilka A (2013) Gain-scheduled PID controller design. J Process Control 23(8):1141–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao P, Jin W, Chengfu W, Ma S (2019) Model and robust gain-scheduled PID control of a bio-inspired morphing UAV based on LPV method. Asian J Control 21(4):1681–1705

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Vesely V, Ilka A (2017) Generalized robust gain-scheduled PID controller design for affine LPV systems with polytopic uncertainty. Syst Control Lett 105:6–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Blondel V, Tsitsiklis JN (1997) NP-hardness of some linear control design problems. SIAM J Control Optim 35(6):2118–2127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadabadi MS, Peaucelle D (2016) From static output feedback to structured robust static output feedback: a survey. Ann Rev Control 42:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mattei M (2001) Robust multivariable PID control for linear parameter varying systems. Automatica 37(12):1997–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao J, Budman HM (2005) Design of robust gain-scheduled PI controllers for nonlinear processes. J Process Control 15(7):807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwiatkowski A, Werner H, Blath JP, Ali A, Schultalbers M (2009) Linear parameter varying PID controller design for charge control of a spark-ignited engine. Control Eng Pract 17(11):1307–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zandi Nia A, Nagamune R (2018) Switching gain-scheduled proportional integral derivative electronic throttle control for automotive engines. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 140(7):071015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen A-T, Chevrel P, Claveau F (2018) Gain-scheduled static output feedback control for saturated LPV systems with bounded parameter variations. Automatica 89:420–424

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin C, Wang Q-G, Lee TH (2004) An improvement on multivariable PID controller design via iterative LMI approach. Automatica 40(3):519–525

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shu Z, Lam J (2009) An augmented system approach to static output feedback stabilization with \(H_\infty \) performance for continuous time plants. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 19(7):768–785

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Crusius CAR, Trofino A (1999) Sufficient LMI conditions for output feedback control problems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 44(5):1053–1057

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Apkarian P, Bompart V, Noll D (2007) Nonsmooth structured control design with application to PID loop shaping of a process. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 17(14):1320–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang B, Bei L, Li Q (2019) A proportional-integral-based robust state-feedback control method for linear parameter-varying systems and its application to aircraft. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 233(12):4663–4675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Souza CE, Trofino A (2006) Gain scheduled \(H_2\) controller synthesis for linear parameter varying systems via parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 16(5):243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Oliveira MC, Skelton RE (2001) Stability tests for constrained linear systems. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen LT, Ogburn ME, Gilbert WP, Kibler KS, Brown PW, Deal PL (1979) Simulator study of stall/post-stall characteristics of a fighter airplane with relaxed longitudinal static stability. NASA Techanical Paper, 1538

  26. Stevens BL, Lewis FL, Johnson EN (2015) Aircraft control and simulation: dynamics, controls design, and autonomous systems. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant #61473186.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: BH developed the theoretical formalism, performed the numerical simulation, and drafted the manuscript; BL conceived the original idea, supervised the project, and finalized the manuscript; RN helped verify the theory; QL helped verify the numerical results. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bei Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Appendix

Appendix

The system parameters at \( h=1000\) ft and \( V=300\) ft/s are given as

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ \begin{array}{cc} A_\mathrm{{air}} &{} B_\mathrm{{air}} \\ C_\mathrm{{air}} &{} D_\mathrm{{air}} \end{array} \right] =\left[ \begin{array}{ccccc|cc} -0.0303 &{} -8.0728 &{} -2.8148 &{} -32.1739 &{} 0.3684 &{} 0 &{} 0.0057 \\ -0.0007 &{} -0.5918 &{} 0.9042 &{} -6.2315\times 10^{-15} &{} -0.0002 &{} 0 &{} -0.0013 \\ 0 &{} -1.1893 &{} -0.8983 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} -0.0634 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} -1 &{} 64.94 &{} 0 \\ \hline 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 &{} 0 \end{array} \right] . \end{aligned}$$

The control gains of the induced \( L_2 \) norm LPV-PID control are given as

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} K_{P}&K_{I}&K_{D} \end{array} \right] =\left[ \begin{array}{cccc|c|cc} -5370.5244 &{} -19.4187 &{} 1.0971 &{} 4335.5679 &{} -1465.9746 &{} -507.1957 &{} 225.3770 \\ 51604.6521 &{} -2.5148 &{} -11.0291 &{} -41042.0583 &{} 14696.6093 &{} 5404.5756 &{} 5404.5756 \end{array} \right] . \end{aligned}$$

The control gains of the \( L_2 \) norm LPV-PID control are given as

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} K_{P}&K_{I}&K_{D} \end{array} \right] =\left[ \begin{array}{cccc|c|cc} -83.1068 &{} -0.4452 &{} 0.0006 &{} 83.0968 &{} -0.0010 &{} -1.1243 &{} 4.0368 \\ 1064.6304 &{} 0.0105 &{} -0.1167 &{} -1042.0765 &{} 0.0056 &{} 60.2930 &{} -51.3934 \end{array} \right] . \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, B., Lu, B., Nagamune, R. et al. LMI-based linear parameter varying PID control design and its application to an aircraft control system. AS 5, 309–321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-021-00104-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-021-00104-y

Keywords

Navigation