Skip to main content
Log in

Behavior of mixing enhancement in microscale shock cylindrical bubble interaction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The investigation in the mixing characteristics of microscale shock cylindrical bubble interaction (SBI) provides a fundamental perspective into the microscale fuel injection. In present paper, the mixing performance of multi-scale SBI is numerically studied based on compressible Navier–Stokes equation. Starting from the bubble morphology, a scaling behavior of concentration distribution is exhibited in macroscale dynamics, whereas a superior capability of concentration decaying is observed in microscale cases. On the basis of mixedness evaluation, the mixing property of microscale bubbles is reinforced in the pre-interaction stage with notable viscous diffusion, and suppressed in the later evolution in the absence of vortex formation. Resorting to the Lagrangian coherent structure, a spatial coincidence between fluid stretching and mixing extent is visualized. The present study attempts to clarify the physical rationality of microscale injection strategies such as the atomization process and multiple micro-nozzles for mixing enhancement. Further efforts are devoted to physically modelling the competing mechanism of stirring effect (macroscale dynamics) and viscous diffusion (microscale dynamics) for optimal mixing performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meshkov E (1969) Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave. Fluid Dyn 4:101–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richtmyer R (1960) Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun Pure Appl Math 13:297–319

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein R, McKee C, Colella P (1994) On the hydrodynamic interaction of shock waves with interstellar clouds. 1: nonradiative shocks in small clouds. Astrophys J 420:213–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindl J (1995) Development of the indirect drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain. Phys Plasmas 2:3933–4024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang J, Kubota T, Zukoski E (1993) Applications of shock-induced mixing to supersonic combustion. AIAA J 31:854–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranjan D, Oakley J, Bonazza R (2011) Shock-bubble interactions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:117–140

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudinger G, Somers L (1960) Behaviour of small regions of different gases carried in accelerated gas flows. J Fluid Mech 7:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo X, Wang M, Si T (2015) On the interaction of a planar shock with an sf6 polygon. J Fluid Mech 773:366–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang J, Kubota T, Zukoski E (1994) A model for characterization of a vortex pair formed by shock passage over a light-gas inhomogeneity. J Fluid Mech 258:217–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niederhaus J, Greenough J, Oakley J (2008) A computational parameter study for the three dimensional shock bubble interaction. J Fluid Mech 594:85–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranjan D, Niederhaus JHJ, Oakley JG (2008) Shock-bubble interactions: features of divergent shock-refraction geometry observed in experiments and simulations. Phys Fluids 20:036101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding J, Si T, Chen M (2017) On the interaction of a planar shock with a three-dimensional light gas cylinder. J Fluid Mech 828:289–317

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sha S, Chen Z, Xue D (2013) The generation of jet and mixing induced by the interaction of shock wave with R22 cylinder. Acta Phys Sin 62:144701

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumara S, Orlicz G, Tomkins C (2005) Stretching of material lines in shock-accelerated gaseous flows. Phys Fluids 17:082107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs JW (1992) Shock-induced mixing of a light-gas cylinder. J Fluid Mech 234:629–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tomkins C, Kumar S, Orlicz G (2008) An experimental investigation of mixing mechanisms in shock-accelerated flow. J Fluid Mech 611:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallis M, Koehler T, Torczynski J (2015) Direct simulation Monte Carlo investigation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. Phys Fluids 27:084105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh S, Karchani A, Myong RS (2018) Non-equilibrium effects of diatomic and polyatomic gases on the shock-vortex interaction based on the second-order constitutive model of the Boltzmann–Curtiss equation. Phys Fluids 30:016109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ern A, Giovangigli V (1994) Multicomponent transport algorithms. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kee RJ, Coltrin ME, Glarborg P (2005) Chemically reacting flow: theory and practice. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kee R, Rupley F, Meeks E, Miller J (1996) Chemkin-III a fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical and plasma kinetics, Sandia national laboratories report SAND96-8216

  22. Wang Z, Yu B, Chen H et al (2018) Scaling vortex breakdown mechanism based on viscous effect in shock cylindrical bubble interaction. Phys Fluids 30:126103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu X, Osher S, Chan T (1994) Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J Comput Phys 115:200–212

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Spiteri RJ, Ruuth SJ (2003) Non-linear evolution using optimal fourth-order strong-stability-preserving Runge–Kutta methods. Math Comput Simul 62:125–135

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Verwer J, Sommeijer B (2004) RKC time-stepping for advection-diffusion-reaction problems. J Comput Phys 20:61–79

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Bagabir A, Drikakis D (2001) Mach number effects on shock-bubble interaction. Shock Waves 11:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta S, Zhang S, Zabusky N (2003) Shock interaction with a heavy gas cylinder: emergence of vortex bilayers and vortex-accelerated baroclinic circulation generation. Laser Part Beams 21:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cetegen BM, Mohamad N (1993) Experiments on liquid mixing and reaction in a vortex. J Fluid Mech 249:391–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haller G (2015) Lagrangian coherent structures. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 47:137–162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Qin S, Liu H, Xiang Y (2018) Lagrangian flow visualization of multiple co-axial co-rotating vortex rings. J Vis 21:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Centre for High Performance Computing of SJTU for providing the supercomputer \(\pi \) to support this research. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91741113, 91841303, and 91941301).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Yu, B., Zhang, B. et al. Behavior of mixing enhancement in microscale shock cylindrical bubble interaction. AS 4, 143–149 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-020-00076-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-020-00076-5

Keywords

Navigation