References
Anscombe, Elizabeth (1981a). “Rules, rights and promises.” In: The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe. Vol. 3. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 97–103. [1978].
Anscombe, Elizabeth (1981b). “The reality of the past.” In: The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 103–119. [1950].
Anscombe, Elizabeth (1996). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. 4th ed. St. Augustine’s Press. [1959].
Anscombe, Elizabeth (2005). “Who is wronged? Philippa Foot on double effect: One point.” In: Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe. Ed. by Luke Gormally and Mary Geach. Exeter: Imprint Academic, pp. 249–251. [1967].
Anthony, Andrew (2022). “Review: Metaphysical Animals.” In: The Guardian. February 8.
Mac Cumhaill, Clare and Rachael Wiseman (2022a). Mapping the Quartet. Women in Parentheses. URL: https://mappingthequartet.org/.
Mac Cumhaill, Clare and Rachael Wiseman (2022b). The Quartet: Wie vier Frauen die Philosophie zurück ins Leben brachten. Trans. by Jens Hagestedt, Frank Lachmann, and Andreas Thomsen. München: C. H. Beck.
Foot, Philippa (1967). “The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect.” In: Oxford Review 5, pp. 5–15.
Foot, Philippa (2001). Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geach, Peter (1956). “Good and evil.” In: Analysis 17.2, pp. 33–42
Hlobil, Ulf and Katharina Nieswandt (2016). “On Anscombe’s philosophical method.” In: Kle¯sis 35, pp. 180–198.
Lipscomb, Benjamin (2022). The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mason, Cathy (2022). “Review: The Women Are Up to Something.” In: Philosophy 97.4, pp. 549–553.
Midgley, Mary (2005). The Owl of Minerva: A Memoir. London; New York: Routledge.
Midgley, Mary (2013). “Letter: The golden age of female philosophy.” In: The Guardian. November 28.
Miller, Laura (2022). “First, let’s kill all the logical positivists.” In: The New York Times Book Review. June 26.
Nieswandt, Katharina (2016). “Anscombe on the sources of normativity.” In: The Journal of Value Inquiry 51.1, pp. 141–163.
Nieswandt, Katharina (2021). Gender Ratio in Philosophy: An Inferential-Statistical Model of Possible Determinants. Blog of the Canadian Philosophical Association, November 21. URL: https://www.acpcpa.ca/blogs/gender-ratio-in-philosophy-an-inferential-statistical-model-of-possible-determinants.
Roedig, Andrea (2022). “Buchkritik: The Quartet.” In: Sein und Streit. March20. Deutschlandfunk Kultur.
Thompson, Morgan et al. (2016). “Why do women leave philosophy? Surveying students at the introductory level.” In: Philosophers’ Imprint 16.6, pp. 1–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nieswandt, K. Clare Mac Cumhaill & Rachael Wiseman: Metaphysical Animals. How Four Women Brought Philosophy Back to Life. ZEMO 5, 231–235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-022-00135-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-022-00135-w