Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulating Zn, Cd and Ni Transport in Disturbed and Undisturbed Soil Columns: Comparison of Alternative Models

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compared four solute transport models for three heavy metals, i.e. Zn, Cd and Ni, in two disturbed and undisturbed loamy soil columns. The models include convection–dispersion equation (CDE), mobile–immobile model (MIM), fractional advection–dispersion equation (FADE) and the continuous time random walk model (CTRW). The experiments were carried out for each metal at three initial concentrations (C0 = 50, 100 and 150 mg L−1) and three replications in both soil columns. The results indicated that CDE, MIM, FADE and CTRW, with r2 > 0.98 and RMSE < 0.06, were capable of describing the BTCs of these heavy metals adequately. Compared to FADE and CTRW, CDE and MIM had better BTC fits with higher r2 values and lower RMSE values in both soil columns. The models in the disturbed soil had a better fit than the undisturbed soil. As C0 was increased, the retardation factor (R) of Zn, Cd and Ni decreased. Regardless of the type of soil column, R reveals the trend: Zn > Ni > Cd. The hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D) in the undisturbed soil was higher than the disturbed soil. The spreading parameter (β) of CTRW and the fractional differentiation orders (α) in FADE were approximately 1.0 and 1.7, respectively. Consequently, the heavy metal transport within both soil columns were anomalous or non-Fickian transport. However, CDE and MIM, which are based on Fickian diffusion law, were more appropriate for simulating heavy metal transport through two soil columns in comparison with CTRW and FADE.

Article Highlights

  • Simulation of solute transport for three heavy metals, i.e. Zn, Cd and Ni.

  • Comparison of solute behavior in disturbed and undisturbed loamy soil columns.

  • Apply convection–dispersion equation (CDE), mobile–immobile model (MIM), fractional advection–dispersion equation (FADE) and the continuous time random walk model (CTRW).

  • Apply models in different initial concentration.

  • Sensitivity analysis of the most influential factors on the model output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bear J (1972) Dynamic of fluids in porous media. American Elsevier Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson DA (1998) The fractional advection–dispersion equation: development and application, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada, Reno

  • Benson DA, Wheatcraft SW, Meerschaert MM (2000a) Application of fractional advection–dispersion equation. Water Resour Res 36(6):1403–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson DA, Wheatcraft SW, Meerschaert MM (2000b) The fractional—order governing equation of Levy motion. Water Resour Res 36(6):1413–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H (1995) On characterization of anomalous dispersion in porous and fractured media. Water Resour Res 31(6):1461–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H (1997) Anomalous transport in random fracture networks. Phys Rev Lett 79(20):4038–4041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H (1998) Theory of anomalous chemical transport in fracture networks. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Top 575:5858–5869

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H (2001) The role of probabilistic approaches to transport theory in heterogeneous media. Transp Porous Media 42:241–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H (2008) Exploring the nature of non-Fickian transport in laboratory experiments. Adv Water Resour 32(5):750–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H, Silliman E (2000) Anomalous transport in laboratory-scale, heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour Res 36(1):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Klafter J, Metzler R, Scher R (2002) Physical pictures of transport in heterogeneous media: advection–dispersion, random walk and fractional derivative formulations. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr001030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Cortis A, Dentz M, Scher H (2006a) Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as, a continuous time random walk. Rev Geophys 44(2):1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Cortis A, Dentz M, Scher H (2006b) Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Rev Geophys 44:RG2003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005rg000178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Emmanuel S, Scher H (2008) Non-Fickian transport and multiplerate mass transfer in porous media. Water Resour Res 44(3):W03402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr005906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijeljic B, Blunt MJ (2006) Pore-scale modeling and continuous time random walk analysis of dispersion in porous media. Water Resour Res 42:W01202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromly M, Hinz C (2004) Non-Fickian transport in laboratory experiments. Adv Res 40:W07402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003w@002579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummer GW (1986) Heavy metal species, mobility and availability in soils. In: Bemhard M, Brinckman FE, Sadler PJ (eds) The importance of chemical speciation in environmental processes. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brusseau ML, Larsen T, Christensen TH (1991) Rate-limited sorption and non-equilibrium transport of organic chemicals in low organic carbon aquifer materials. Water Resour Res 27(6):1137–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camur MZ, Yazicigil H (2005) Laboratory determination of multicomponent effective diffusion coefficients for heavy metals in a compacted clay. Turk J Earth Sci 14(1):91–103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortis A, Berkowitz B (2004) Anomalous transport in “classical soil and sand columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1539–1548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortis A, Gallo C, Scher H, Berkowitz B (2004) Numerical simulation of non-Fickian transport in geological formations with multiple-scale heterogeneities. Water Resour Res 40(4):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortis A, Harter T, Hou L, Atwill ER, Packman A, Green P (2006) Transport of Cryptosporidium parvum in porous media: Long-term elution experiments and continuous time random walk filtration modeling. Water Resour Res 42:W12S13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr004897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng ZQ, de Lima JLMP, de Lima MIP, Singh VP (2006) A fractional dispersion model for overland solute transport. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004146 (to view the published open abstract, go to http://dx.doi.org and enter the DOI)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentz M, Cortis A, Scher H, Berkowitz B (2004) Time behavior of solute transport in heterogeneous media: transition from anomalous to normal transport. Adv Water Resour Res 27:155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.11.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Zhan H, Feng Sh, Huang G, Mao X (2009) Comparison of alternative models for simulating anomalous solute transport in a large heterogeneous soil column. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Huang Q, Zhan H, Chen J, Xiong Y, Feng S (2005) Modeling containment transport in homogeneous porous media with fractional advection–dispersion equation. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 48:295–302

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Huang Q, Zhan H (2006) Evidence of one-dimensional scale-dependent fractional advection–dispersion. J Contam Hydrol 85(1–2):53–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jury WA (1982) Simulate of solute transport using a transfer functionmodel. Water Resour Res 18:363–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy M, Berkowitz B (2003) Measurement and analysis of non-Fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media. J Contam Hydrol 64:203–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Ren L (2009) Application of continuous time random walk theory to non-equilibrium transport in soil. J Contam Hydrol 108(3):134–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HF, Genard M, Guichard S, Bertin N (2007) Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes. J Exp Bot 58(13):3567–3580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mao M, Ren L (2004) Simulating non-equilibrium transport of atrazine through saturated soil. Groundwater 42:500–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montroll EW, Weiss JGH (1965) Random walks on lattices. II. Math Phys 6:167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi G, Mehdinejadiani B (2018) Modelling solute transport in homogeneous and heterogeneous porous media using spatial fractional advection–dispersion equation. Soil Water Res 13(1):18–28. https://doi.org/10.17221/245/2016-swr

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pechepsky Y, Benon D, Rawls W (2000) Simulating scale-dependent solute transport in soils with the fractional advective–dispersive equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(3):1234–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saadati Z, Delbari M, Panahi M, Amiri E (2018) Simulation of sugar beet growth under water stress using AquaCrop model. J Water Soil Resour Conserv 7(3):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh SH (2011) Isotherm and kinetic studies on adsorption of Pb, Zn and Cu by kaolinite. Casp J Environ Sci 9(2):243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh SH (2015) Modeling contaminant transport in saturated soil column with the continuous time random walk. J Porous Media 18(12):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh SH, Beyrami H (2015) Modeling bromide transport in undisturbed soil columns with the continuous time random walk. Geotech Geol Eng 33:1511–1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9917-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simunek J, Jarvis N, Van Genuchten M, Garenas A (2003) Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in vadose zone. J Hydrol 272:14–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari PR, Bala Ramudha P, Srivastava RK, Gupta MK (2007) Sorption and desorption studies of metallic zinc on an alluvial soil. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 3:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Toride N, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT (1995) The CXTFIT code for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments. US Salinity Lab report 137. GEBJ Salinity Laboratory—USDA-ARS, Riverside, California

  • Toride N, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MT (1999) The CXTFIT Cod for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments. Version 2.0. Research report 137. US Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Reverside, CA

  • Tyler LD, McBride MB (1982) Mobility and extractability of cadmium, copper, nickel and zinc in organic and mineral soil columns. Soil Sci 134:198–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten MTh, Wieregna PJ (1976) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media: I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40(4):473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten MT, Wierenga PJ (1977) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media: II. Experimental evaluation with tritium (3H2O). Soil Sci Soc Am J 41(2):272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventrella D, Mohnaty BP, Simunek J, Losavio N, Vam Genuchten MTh (2000) Water and chloride transport in a fine-textured soil: field experiments and modeling. Soil Sci Soc Am 165(8):624–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Huang G, Huang Q (2006) Modeling solute transport in one-dimensional homogeneous and heterogeneous soil columns with continuous time random walk. J Contam Hydrol 86(3–4):163–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XW, Crawford JK, Deeks LI, Stutter M, Bengough A, Glyn M, Young I (2005) A mass balance based numerical method for the fractional advection–dispersion equation: theory and application. Water Resources Research. 41(7):W07029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003818

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Samira Morsali, Hossein Babazadeh & Hossein Sedghi

  2. Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

    Shahram Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh

Authors
  1. Samira Morsali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hossein Babazadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shahram Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hossein Sedghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Babazadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morsali, S., Babazadeh, H., Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh, S. et al. Simulating Zn, Cd and Ni Transport in Disturbed and Undisturbed Soil Columns: Comparison of Alternative Models. Int J Environ Res 13, 721–734 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-019-00212-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-019-00212-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation