Abstract
This article proposes a method to provide support to expert decision-making in designing the layout of chemical plants. Our approach applies the Bacterial Foraging Algorithm, a meta-heuristic optimization scheme, to determine an allocation of main process units in the two-dimensional space. The optimization aims at minimizing a total cost measure, which accounts for both the capital costs associated with usage of the area, piping, and secondary contention, and the expected costs generated by equipment losses incurred in case of explosions. To assess fire and explosion hazards, we use Dow’s Fire and Explosion Index, which provides a convenient means to estimate equipment allocation’s inherent danger and map it into prescriptions of minimal distances between units. The proposed solution approach provides an alternative to hard-optimization methods by allowing greater flexibility in accounting for both safety and economic aspects, while providing high-quality solutions in reduced computation time. A case study of an acrylic acid production plant, which several other papers in the literature have also used, serves the purpose of demonstrating the appropriateness and effectiveness of the method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ahumada CB, Quddus N, Mannan M (2018) A method for facility layout optimisation including stochastic risk assessment. Process Safe Environ Protect 117(1):616–628
AIChE (1994) Dow’s fire & explosion index hazard classification guide technical report. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
Ashford NA, Gobbell JV, Lachman J, Matthiesen M, Minzner A, Stone R (1993) The encouragement of technological change for preventing chemical accidents: moving firms from secondary prevention and mitigation to primary prevention. Number July. Center for Technology, Policy and Industrial Development, Cambridge, 1st edn
Atasagun Y, Kara Y (2013) Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm for assembly line balancing. Neural Comput Appl 25(1):237–250
Bollinger RE, Clark DG, III AMD, Ewbank RM, Hendershot DC, Lutz WK, Meszaros SI, Park DE, Wixom ED (1998) Inherently safer chemical processes: A life cycle approach, vol 28. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
Caputo AC, Pelagagge PM, Palumbo M, Salini P (2015) Safety-based process plant layout using genetic algorithm. J Loss Prevent Process Indust 34:139–150
Castell C, Lakshmanan R, Skilling J, Bañares-Alcántara R (1998) Optimisation of process plant layout using genetic algorithms. Comput Chem Eng 22(98):S993–S996
CCPS (1989) Guidelines for process equipment reliability data, 1st edn. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
CCPS (2003) Guidelines for facility siting and layout, 1st edn. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
de Lira-Flores J, Vázquez-Román R, López-Molina A, Mannan MS (2014) A MINLP approach for layout designs based on the domino hazard index. J Loss Prevent Process Indust 30(1):219–227
Dreo J, Siarry P, Petrowski A, Taillard E (2006) Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin
Kaufmann A, Henry-Labordere A (1977) Integer and mixed programming: theory and applications, 1st edn. Academic Press Inc, Cambridge
Khan FI, Amyotte P (2003) How to make inherent safety practice a reality. Canadian J Chem Eng 81(1):2–16
Kletz TA (1991) Plant design for safety : a user-friendly approach. Hemisphere Pub. Corp
Kletz TA, Amyotte P (2010) Process plants: A handbook for inherently safer design, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
Mannan MS (2012) Lee’s loss prevention in the process industries, 3rd edn. Elsevier Inc, Texas
Mecklenburgh JC (1985) Process plant layout. Wiley, New York
Mejía-Moncayo C., Battaia O (2019) A hybrid optimization algorithm with genetic and bacterial operators for the design of cellular manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(13):1409–1414
Mejía-Moncayo C., Rojas AE, Mura I (2018) A discrete bacterial chemotaxis approach to the design of cellular manufacturing layouts. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), vol 10960 LNCS. Springer, pp 423–437
Moran S (2017) Process plant layout, 2nd edn. Joe Hayton, England
Nemet A, Klemeš J.J., Kravanja Z (2018) Process synthesis with simultaneous consideration of inherent safety-inherent risk footprint. Front Chem Sci Eng 12(1):745–762
NFPA (2009) 704 standard system for the identification of the hazards of materials for emergency response, 2007 Edition. technical report national fire protection association. Quincy, Massachusetts USA
Nouri H (2016) Development of a comprehensive model and bfo algorithm for a dynamic cellular manufacturing system. Applied Mathematical Modelling 40(2):1514–1531
Nouri H, Hong TS (2012) A bacteria foraging algorithm based cell formation considering operation time. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 31(3):326–336
Nouri H, Hong TS (2013) Development of bacteria foraging optimization algorithm for cell formation in cellular manufacturing system considering cell load variations. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 32(1):20–31
Nouri H, Tang SH, Hang Tuah BT, Anuar MK (2010) BASE: A bacteria foraging algorithm for cell formation with sequence data. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 29(2-3):102–110
OSHA (2000) Process Safety Management, 1st edn. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, USA
Palaniappan C, Srinivasan R, Tan RB (2002) Expert system for the design of inherently safer processes. 2. flowsheet development stage. Indus Eng Chem Res 41(26):6711–6722
Passino KM (2002) Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. Control Systems IEEE 22(3):52– 67
Patsiatzis DI, Knight G, Papageorgiou LG (2004) An MILP approach to safe process plant layout. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 82(5):579–586
Penteado FD, Ciric AR (1996) An MINLP approach for safe process plant layout. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 35(4):1354–1361
Roy N, Eljack F, Jimenez-Gutierrez A, Zhang B, Thiruvenkataswamy P, El-Halwagi M, Mannan S (2016) A review of safety indices for process design. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 14:42–48
Thiago D, Alves S, Luiz J, Medeiros D, Queiroz OD, Araújo F (2016) Journal of loss prevention in the process industries optimal determination of chemical plant layout via minimization of risk to general public using monte carlo and simulated annealing techniques. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 41:202–214
Tugnoli A, Khan F, Amyotte P, Cozzani V (2008a) Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: Implementing inherent safety perspective. part 1 - guideword applicability and method description. Journal of Hazardous Materials 160(1):100–109
Tugnoli A, Khan F, Amyotte P, Cozzani V (2008b) Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: Implementing inherent safety perspective. part 2-domino hazard index and case study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 160(1):110– 121
Xu Y, Wang Z, Zhu Q (2013) An improved hybrid genetic algorithm for chemical plant layout optimization with novel non-overlapping and toxic gas dispersion constraints. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 21(4):412–419
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sierra, D.A., Rueda, J.F., Mejía-Moncayo, C. et al. A Bacterial Foraging Approach for Safer Plant Layout Designs. Process Integr Optim Sustain 6, 681–692 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-022-00241-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-022-00241-7