Abstract
Objectives
A characteristic of some individuals with autism is described as an “insistence on sameness.” For these individuals, a violation of sameness may occasion problem behavior. Given this, a more precise understanding of the construct of sameness from a behavioral perspective is desirable for assessment and intervention purposes. In this paper, we first examined the role of an existing behavioral theory, stimulus overselectivity, in relation to this issue. A detailed stimulus control analysis led to the conclusion that this theory does not adequately account for problem behavior occasioned by violations of sameness. Based on this analysis, we developed a conceptual model for assessing and treating problem behavior associated with insistence on sameness.
Methods
Three representative cases from our past clinical experience with children with autism were employed to develop the conceptual model: (a) paying attention to too few stimuli, (b) paying to too many stimuli, and (c) paying attention to sequentially presented stimuli. Following a detailed stimulus control analysis of each case, we introduce a competing behavior pathways framework for organizing a functional assessment of child problem behavior occasioned by violations of sameness, and for developing a behavior support plan that emphasizes prevention, teaching, and positive reinforcement. We then apply the framework to the three cases, and illustrate its utility for developing an individualized, multicomponent positive behavior support plan for each of the children.
Conclusions
We conclude the paper with considerations for future research to empirically examine the proposed conceptual framework for understanding and treating problem behavior in individuals with autism associated with violations of sameness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, S. L. (1981). Stimulus overselectivity in learning disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 239–248.
Bellamy, G. T., Horner, R. H., & Inman, D. P. (1979). Vocational habilitation of severely retarded adults: A direct service technology. University Park Press.
Boutot, E. A. & Smith Myles, B. (2011). Autism spectrum disorders: Foundations, characteristics, and effective strategies. Pearson Education, Inc.
Cipani, E. (2012). Stimulus overselectivity: Empirical basis and diagnostic methods. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100712
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Edelson, S. M. (n.d.) Stimulus overselectivity: Tunnel vision in autism. Retrieved February 12, 2011, from http://www.autism-help.org/points-tunnel-vision-autism.htm
Gersten, R. M. (1980). In search of the cognitive deficit in autism: Beyond the stimulus overselectivity model. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 47–65.
Iwata, B. (2011, October). Preventing problem behavior. Keynote presentation presented at the annual conference of the Manitoba Association for Behavior Analysis, Winnipeg, MB
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Pathology, 217–250
Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1977). Teaching autistic children to respond to simultaneous multiple cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 299–311.
Koegel, R. L., & Wilhelm, H. (1973). Selective responding to the components of multiple visual cues by autistic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 442–453.
Litrownik, A. J., McInnis, E. T., Wetzel-Pritchard, A. M., & Filipelli, D. L. (1978). Restricted stimulus control and inferred attentional deficits in autistic and retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 554–562.
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1979). Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 86(6), 1236–1254.
Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R., & Rehm, R. (1971). Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77(3), 211–222.
Martens, B. K. , & Witt, J. C. (1988). Ecological behavior analysis. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 22; pp. 115–140). Sage.
O'Neill, R. E., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. R. (2015). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. (1975). Setting generality and stimulus control in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(3), 235–246.
Schreibman, L. (1997). The study of stimulus control in autism. In D. M. Baer & E. M. Pinkston (Eds.), Environment and Behavior (pp. 203–291). Westview Press.
Schreibman, L., Koegel, R. L., & Craig, M. S. (1977). Reducing stimulus overselectivity in autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5(4), 425–436.
Schreibman, L., & Lovaas, O. I. (1973). Overselective response to social stimuli by autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1(2), 152–168.
Schrover, L. R., & Newsom, C. D. (1976). Overselectivity, developmental level, and overtraining in autistic and normal children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4(3), 289–298.
Sprague, J. R., & Horner, R. H. (1999). Low-frequency high-intensity problem behavior: Toward an applied technology of functional assessment and intervention. In A. C. Repp & R. H. Horner (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support (pp. 98–116). Wadsworth.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Wilhelm, H., & Lovaas, I. O. (1976). Stimulus overselectivity: A common feature in autism and mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81(1), 26–31.
Acknowledgements
We thank Robert H. Horner for his helpful comments and recommendations for the first draft of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RS: conducted the initial conceptual analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. JL: collaborated in the conduct of the conceptual analysis and reviewed and edited all versions of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Stock, R., Lucyshyn, J. Insistence on Sameness in Autistic Children: a Stimulus Control Analysis with Implications for Assessment and Support. Adv Neurodev Disord 7, 189–202 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-022-00302-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-022-00302-5