Abstract
Objective
This study sought to document the necessary adaptations to early childhood education program policies, procedures, and funding allocations to fully implement the Pyramid Model framework with fidelity.
Methods
An administrative interview including both quantitative and qualitative data was developed for the purposes of the research. Ten program directors and administrative staff from 6 CSEFEL and TACSEI demonstration site programs in 4 states across the USA participated.
Results
Quantitative results revealed that program administrators reported either altering (70.44%) or creating (60.52%) a new policy, procedure, or budget item for a majority of all interview item categories to fully implement the Pyramid Model. Across interview items, more than half of demonstration programs (69%) reported altering or creating a program policy, procedure, or budget item. Over half of programs (58%) also reported that these policies, procedures, or related budget items were documented in writing. Qualitative results suggested that program administrators viewed (1) program alterations reflecting alignment specifically with Pyramid Model practices; (2) intra-program collaboration and collaboration between program staff and stakeholders; and (3) written documentation of program policies, procedures, or budget items as highly important for fully implementing the Pyramid Model with fidelity.
Conclusions
Results provide detailed information regarding specific ways that administrators adapted program policies, procedures, and related budget items to fully implement the Pyramid Model with fidelity. These findings can prove useful for administrators aiming to successfully implement the Pyramid Model framework in their early childhood programs to support children with developmental disabilities and typically developing children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Gallo, C. G., & Brown, C. H. (2018). The cascading effects of multiple dimensions of implementation of program outcomes: A test of a theoretical model. Prevention Science, 19(6), 782–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0855-4
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Brown, M. A., McIntyre, L. L., Crnic, K. A., Baker, B. L., & Blacher, J. (2011). Preschool children with and without developmental delay: Risk, parenting, and child demandingness. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 4(3), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2011.596990
Crosland, K., & Dunlap, G. (2012). Effective strategies for the inclusion of children with autism in general education classrooms. Behavior Modification, 36(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512442682
Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education. Division for Early Childhood. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
Dunlap, G., Wilson, K., Strain, P., & Lee, J. (2013). Prevent-teach-reinforce for young children: The early childhood model of individualized positive behavior support. Brookes.
Durlak, J. A. (2010). The importance of doing well in whatever you do: A commentary on the special section, “Implementation research in early childhood education.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(3), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.03.003
Durlak, J. A. (2016). Programme implementation in social and emotional learning: Basic issues and research findings. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1142504
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blasé, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. National Implementation Research Network. https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/sites/nirn.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/NIRN-MonographFull-01-2005.pdf
Fox, L., Hemmeter, M. L., & Snyder, P. (2012). Teaching Pyramid Observation Tool for preschool classrooms (TPOT): Research edition. NC Early Learning Network. https://nceln.fpg.unc.edu/sites/nceln.fpg.unc.edu/files/events/ScoreSheetFinal.pdf
Fox, L., Veguilla, M., and Perez Binder, D. (2014). Data decision-making and program-wide implementation of the pyramid model: Roadmap to effective intervention practices #7. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577844.pdf
George, P., Blasé, K. A., Kanary, P. J., Wotring, J., Bernstein, D., & Carter, W. J. (2008). Financing evidence-based programs and practices: Changing systems to support effective service. Child and family evidence-based practices consortium. https://docplayer.net/174050694-Financing-evidence-based-programs-and-practices.html
Gomez, C. R., Walls, S., & Baird, S. (2007). On the same page: Seeking fidelity of intervention. Young Exceptional Children, 10(4), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/109625060701000403
Hehir, T., Grindal, T., Freeman, B., Lamoreau, R., Borquaye, Y., & Burke, S. (2016). A summary of the evidence on inclusive education. ABT Associates. https://www.abtassociates.com/sites/default/files/2019-03/A_Summary_of_the_evidence_on_inclusive_education.pdf
Hemmeter, M. L., Ostrosky, M., & Fox, L. (2006). Social and emotional foundations for early learning: A conceptual model for intervention. School Psychology Review, 35(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2006.12087963
Hemmeter, M. L., Fox, L., & Snyder, P. (2014). Teaching Pyramid Observation Tool (TPOT) for preschool classrooms manual, research edition. Brookes.
Hemmeter, M. L., Snyder, P. A., Fox, L., & Algina, J. (2016). Evaluating the implementation of the pyramid model for promoting social-emotional competence in early childhood classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416653386
Hemmeter, M. L., Fox, L., Snyder, P., Algina, J., Hardy, J. K., Bishop, C., & Veguilla, M. (2021). Corollary child outcomes from the pyramid model professional development intervention efficacy trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.08.004
Hunter, A., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2009). The center on the social and emotional foundations for early learning: Addressing challenging behaviors in infants and toddlers. Zero to Three, 29(3), 5–12.
Lawrence, S., Smith, S., & Banerjee, R. (2016). Preschool inclusion: Key findings from research and implications for policy. National center for children in poverty. https://www.nccp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/text_1154.pdf
Luiselli, J. K., Putnam, R. F., Handler, M. W., & Feinberg, A. B. (2005). Whole-school positive behaviour support: Effects on student discipline problems and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 25(2–3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000301265
McRae, E. M., Stoppelbein, L., O’Kelley, S. E., Fite, P., & Greening, L. (2019). Predicting child behavior: A comparative analysis between autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(3), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1299-6
Mincic, M., Smith, B. J., & Strain, P. (2009). Administrator strategies that support high fidelity implementation of the pyramid model for promoting social-emotional competence and addressing challenging behavior. Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention for Young Children. https://challengingbehavior.cbcs.usf.edu/docs/IssueBrief_administrator-strategies.pdf
Raver, C. C., & Okada, G. (2011). Classroom-based intervention as a way to support low-income preschoolers’ emotional and behavioral development: Pressing challenges and potential opportunities. In E. Zigler, W. S. Gilliam, & W. S. Barnett (Eds.), The pre-k debates: Current controversies and issues (pp. 104–110). Brookes.
Rivard, M., Terroux, A., Parent-Boursier, C., & Mercier, C. (2014). Determinants of stress in parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(7), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-2028-z
Sanner, C. M., & Neece, C. L. (2018). Parental distress and child behavior problems: Parenting behaviors as mediators. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(2), 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0884-4
Schaack, D., Le, V., & Stedron, J. (2020). When fulfillment is not enough: Early childhood teacher occupational burnout and turnover intentions from a job demands and resource perspective. Early Education & Development, 31(7), 1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1791648
Schultz, D., Ambike, A., Stapleton, L. M., Domitrovich, C. E., Schaeffer, C. M., & Bartels, B. (2010). Development of a questionnaire assessing teacher perceived support for and attitudes about social and emotional learning. Early Education & Development, 21(6), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280903305708
Schweinhart, L. J. (2011). How to make early childhood programs highly effective. In E. Zigler, W. S. Gilliam, & W. S. Barnett (Eds.), The pre-k debates: Current controversies and issues (pp. 141–144). Brookes.
Snyder, P. (2006). Best available research evidence: Impact on research in early childhood. In V. Buysse & P. W. Wesley (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field (pp. 35–70). ZERO TO THREE Press.
Squires, J., & Bricker, D. (2009). Ages and stages questionnaires, third edition (ASQ-3): A parent-completed child monitoring system. Brookes.
Staunton, E., Kehoe, C., & Sharkey, L. (2020). Families under pressure: Stress and quality of life in parents of children with an intellectual disability. Ir J Psychol Med, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.4
Wasik, B. A., & Hindman, A. H. (2011). Improving vocabulary and pre-literacy skills of at-risk preschoolers through teacher professional development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023067
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
Funding
This work was supported by the US Department of Education under grant H325D070002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MSM: collaborated to design the study, drafted the administrative interview, recruited participants, collaborated to collect the data, conducted data analyses, and wrote the paper. CO: conducted data analyses and significantly contributed to editing the paper and final manuscript. BJS: collaborated to design the study, consulted to draft the administrative interview, identified participants for recruitment, and collaborated to collect the data.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The institutional review board at the University of Colorado Denver reviewed and granted ethics approval and consent to conduct this study.
Informed Consent
All individual participants verbally offered informed consent to participate in the study and for all data to be shared through publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mincic, M.S., Ostryn, C. & Smith, B.J. An Evaluation of Early Childhood Program Adaptations for Implementing the Pyramid Model for Children with and Without Developmental Disabilities. Adv Neurodev Disord 6, 521–536 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-022-00247-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-022-00247-9