Abstract
New information and communication technologies change social relations. The article introduces a concept by Stefan Hirschauer grasping this change as a complication of presence. For Emergency Medical Services, full presence of all participants is usually considered essential; however, telemedicine, telehealth physicians, and telecooperation are also gaining ground here. The study describes the foundation and challenges of telemedical situations and analyses how they are managed by physicians, paramedics, and patients being only gradually present for each other. On the organizational level, formal guidelines become more important, and responsibilities shift toward the rescue workers on-site.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We conducted several short ethnographies, group discussions, and interviews at this EMS telemedicine provider from 2015 to 2017. This sociological research was funded by the BMBF (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) and was a part of the interdisciplinary joint project AUDIME. The goal of this project was to provide paramedics, who were administering acute care to people in a medical emergency onsite or in an ambulance, with smart glasses in order to improve their ability to support emergency physicians practicing telemedicine. We observed the interaction enhanced by smart glasses between the emergency physicians and the paramedics during three emergency exercises, recording these on video and conducting interviews afterward. Specific aspects of the smart glasses that are not addressed in this article have been discussed in other publications, also in relation to, among other things, “cyborgization.” See zur Nieden (2017) and zur Nieden and Ellebrecht (2017).
In the research project that we accompanied, this was tested via the camera on the smart glasses. In earlier attempts, the paramedics were equipped with a helmet camera.
Meyer (2015) convincingly describes that the ideal situation of looking at each other during communication cannot be regarded as a global standard. He observed various non-Western cultures that use verbal signals of affirmation instead of eye contact in interactions to signal the end of a sequence, which also creates periods of time during which the speaker does not know whether he or she is being listened to.
Also during our exercises with the smart glasses for AUDIME, it became clear that users not familiar with the teleinteraction format were extremely distracted and were unable to interact adequately with the patient.
References
Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Adm Sci Q 41:61–89
Ayaß R (2005) Interaktion ohne Gegenüber. In: Jäckel M, Mai M (eds) Online-Vergesellschaftung?: Mediensoziologische Perspektiven auf neue Kommunikationstechnologien, 1st edn. VS, Wiesbaden, pp 33–50
Bång A, Herlitz J, Martinell S (2003) Interaction between emergency medical dispatcher and caller in suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest calls with focus on agonal breathing. A review of 100 tape recordings of true cardiac arrest cases. Resuscitation 56:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00278-2
Bergrath S, Rörtgen D, Rossaint R, Beckers SK, Fischermann H, Brokmann JC, Czaplik M, Felzen M, Schneiders M-T, Skorning M (2011) Technical and organisational feasibility of a multifunctional telemedicine system in an emergency medical service—an observational study. J Telemed Telecare 17:317–377
Bergrath S, Czaplik M, Rossaint R, Hirsch F, Beckers SK, Valentin B, Wielpütz D, Schneiders M-T, Brokmann JC (2013) Implementation phase of a multicentre prehospital telemedicine system to support paramedics: feasibility and possible limitations. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 21:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-54
Bruni A, Gherardi S, Parolin LL (2007) Knowing in a system of fragmented knowledge. Mind Cult Act 14:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030701307754
Büscher C, Elsner J, Schneiders M-T, Thelen S, Brodziak T, Seidenberg P, Schilberg D, Tobias M, Jeschke S (2014) The telemedical rescue assistance system “TemRas”—development, first results and impact. In: Jeschke S, Hees F, Isenhardt I, Henning K (eds) Automation, communication and cybernetics in science and engineering 2013/2014. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–32
Clarke M, Fursse J, Brown-Connolly NE, Sharma U, Jones R (2018) Evaluation of the National Health Service (NHS) direct pilot telehealth program: cost-effectiveness analysis. Telemed J E Health 24:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0280
Gherardi S (2010) Telemedicine: a practice-based approach to technology. Hum Relat 63:501–524
Gibson B, Boiko O (2012) Luhmann’s social systems theory, health and illness. In: Scambler G (ed) Contemporary theorists for medical sociology. Routledge, New York, pp 49–70
Goffman E (1961) Encounters. Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Goffman E (1983) The interaction order. Am Sociol Rev 48:1–17
Gonzales Armengol JJ, Carricondo Francisco, Mingorance Carlos, Gil-Loyzaga P (2009) Telemedicine in emergency care: methodological and practical considerations. Emergencias 21:287–294
Haggerty KD, Ericson RV (2000) The surveillant assemblage. Br J Sociol 51:605–622
Henderson C (2018) An economic evaluation of telehealth and telecare in England. PhD thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.6dx0orb1jrtz
Hirschauer S (1991) The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Soc Stud Sci 21:279–319
Hirschauer S (2015) Intersituativität. Teleinteraktionen und Koaktivität jenseits von Mikro und Makro. In: Heintz B, Tyrell H (eds) Interaktion—Organisation—Gesellschaft revisited: Anwendungen, Erweiterungen, Alternativen. Lucius, Stuttgart, pp 109–133
Katzenmeier C, Schrag-Slavu S (2010) Rechtsfragen des Einsatzes der Telemedizin im Rettungsdienst: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Forschungsprojektes Med-on-@ix. Kölner Schriften zum Medizinrecht, vol 2. Springer, Berlin
Klein KJ, Ziegert JC, Knight AP, Xiao Y (2006) Dynamic delegation: shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Adm Sci Q 51:590–621
Knorr Cetina K (2009) The synthetic situation: interactionism for a global world. Symb Interact 32:61–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2009.32.1.61
Knorr Cetina K (2014) Scopic media and global coordination: the mediatization of face-to-face encounters. In: Lundby K (ed) Mediatization of communication. de Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp 39–62
Langabeer JR, Gonzalez M, Alqusairi D, Champagne-Langabeer T, Jackson A, Mikhail J, Persse D (2016) Telehealth-enabled emergency medical services program reduces ambulance transport to urban emergency departments. West J Emerg Med 17:713–720. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.8.30660
Laryionava K, Kreucher S, Groß D (2011) Physician perspectives on telemedicine in pre-hospital emergency medical services. In: Brukamp K, Laryionava K, Schweikardt C, Groß D (eds) Technisierte Medizin - dehumanisierte Medizin?: Ethische, rechtliche und soziale Aspekte neuer Medizintechnologien. Kassel Univ. Press, Kassel, pp 27–32
Latour B (1996) On interobjectivity. Mind Cult Act 3:228–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
Leana CR (1986) Predictors and consequences of delegation. Acad Manag J 29:754–774
Leana CR (1987) Power relinquishment versus power sharing: theoretical clarification and empirical comparison of delegation and participation. J Appl Psychol 72:228–233
Lindemann G (2002) Die Grenzen des Sozialen: Zur sozio-technischen Konstruktion von Leben und Tod in der Intensivmedizin. Übergänge, vol 48. Fink, München
Luhmann N (1972) Einfache Sozialsysteme. Z Soziol 1:51–65
Luhmann N (1990) Der medizinische Code. In: Luhmann N (ed) Konstruktivistische Perspektiven. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp 183–195
Luhmann N (ed) (1995) Social systems. Writing science. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Luhmann N (2013) Theory of society. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif
Luhmann N (2018) Organization and decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mannon JM (1992) Emergency encounters: EMTs and their work, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston
Meyer C (2015) “Metaphysik der Anwesenheit”. Zur Universalitätsfähigkeit soziologischer Interaktionsbegriffe. In: Heintz B, Tyrell H (eds) Interaktion—Organisation—Gesellschaft revisited: Anwendungen, Erweiterungen, Alternativen. Lucius, Stuttgart, pp 321–345
Meyer J, Paré G (2017) The transformative role of telemedicine on coordination: a practice approach. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences
Natafgi N, Shane DM, Ullrich F, MacKinney AC, Bell A, Ward MM (2018) Using tele-emergency to avoid patient transfers in rural emergency departments: an assessment of costs and benefits. J Telemed Telecare 24:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17696585
Palmer CE, Gonsoulin SM (1990) Paramedics, protocols, and procedures: “Playing doc” as deviant role performance. Deviant Behav 11:207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1990.9967845
Psathas G, Waksler FC (1973) Essential features of face-to-face interaction. In: Psathas G (ed) Phenomenological sociology: issues and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 159–183
Saake I (2003) Die Performanz des Medizinischen. Soziale Welt 54:429–459
Schneiders M-T, Herbst S, Schilberg D, Isenhardt I, Jeschke S, Fischermann H, Bergrath S, Rossaint R, Skorning M (2012) Telenotarzt auf dem Prüfstand. Evaluation des Projekts Med-on-@ix aus Sicht der Rettungsassistenten. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 15:410–415
Schneiders M-T, Schilberg D, Jeschke S (2014a) Einführung eines Telematischen Rettungsassistenzsystems in die Organisation Rettungsdienst—zur Rolle der Akzeptanz im Implementierungsmanagement. In: Jenki M, Ellebrecht N, Kaufmann S (eds) Organisationen und Experten des Notfalls. Technik und Kultur von Rettungswesen und Feuerwehr im Wandel. LIT, Berlin, pp 269–286
Schneiders M-T, Schilberg D, Isenhardt I, Jeschke S (2014b) Technological changes in high reliability organization: implementation of a telematic rescue assistance system into German Emergency Medical Services. In: Jeschke S, Hees F, Isenhardt I, Henning K (eds) Automation, communication and cybernetics in science and engineering 2013/2014. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 111–123
Schubert C (2006) Die Praxis der Apparatemedizin. Ärzte und Technik im Operationssaal. Campus Forschung, vol 908. Campus, Frankfurt am Main
Schütz A (1972) The phenomenology of the social world, 1st paperback ed. In: Northwestern University studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Schütz A (1976) Collected papers. Phaenomenologica, vol 15. Nijhoff, The Hague
Skorning M, Bergrath S, Rörtgen D, Brokmann JC, Beckers SK, Protogerakis M, Brodziak R, Rossaint R (2009) “E-Health” in der Notfallmedizin - das Forschungsprojekt Med-on-@ix (E-health in emergency medicine - the research project Med-on-@ix). Der Anaesthesist 58:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-008-1502-z
Stinchcombe AL (2001) When formality works: authority and abstraction in law and organizations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Strauss G (1963) Some notes on power-equalization. In: Leavitt HJ (ed) The social science of organizations: four perspectives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 40–48
Uniklinik RWTH Aachen (2017) TemRas - Telemedizinisches Rettungsassistenzsystem. https://www.ukaachen.de/kliniken-institute/telemedizinzentrum-aachen/projekte-und-kompetenzzentren/temras.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2018
Whitten PS (2002) Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ 324:1434–1437. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1434
zur Nieden A (2017) Helden oder Cyborgs? Datenbrillen und Wearables im Rettungsdienst. Arbeit und Bildung, pp 180–191
zur Nieden A, Ellebrecht N (2017) Inklusion und Exklusion durch Telemedizin. Zu neuen Formen der Interaktion im vernetzten Rettungsdienst. Geschlossene Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellebrecht, N., zur Nieden, A. The Complication of Presence in Telemedical Collaboration: Intersituativity and Its Organizational Consequences. Eur J Secur Res 5, 83–103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-019-00060-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-019-00060-x