Abstract
There is not only the Coulomb force in the orbiting motion between two charged particles, but also a certain magnetic moment coupling interaction. Therefore, according to the macroscopic phenomenon of dipoles, this paper revises the relevant terms of the two-particle stationary Schrödinger equation. The correction in the hydrogen atom and U91+ ion (hydrogen) calculation of hyperfine structure has high calculation precision, such as lamb shift U91+ ions and the theoretical value of quantum electrodynamics basic same. In terms of hyperfine splitting, the developed series is more than the number of quantum electrodynamics and puts forward the concept of the electron orbital tilt angle for the first time. For example, the orbital inclination of hydrogen atom is approximately 0.000069207 radians, and that of U ion is approximately 0.000041427 radians. The results showed that it is because of the existence of this orbital skew that the ground-state electrons will move in a spiral asymptote way, rather than in a closed circular trajectory. This paper also calculates the interaction force between the Sun and Mercury. The calculated result is a third-order tiny quantity more than Newtonian mechanics, which is better than the calculation method of the stationary Schrödinger equation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.
References
Bethe HA (1937) Note on the radiation field of the electron. Phys Rev 52(2):54–59
Born M (1926) Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Z Physik 38:803–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397184
Dayhoff ES, Triebwasser S, Lamb WE (1953) Fine structure of the hydrogen atom. VI. Phys Rev 89:98
Dirac PAM (1927) The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation. Proc R Soc Lond A 114:243–265. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0039
Dirac PAM (1928) The quantum theory of the electron. Proc R Soc Lond A 117:610–624. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0023
Dyson FJ (1952) Divergence of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev 85:631
Feynman RP (1948) Relativistic cut-off for quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev 74:1430
Feynman RP (1949) Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev 76:769
Franken P, Liebes JS (1956) Magnetic moment of the proton in Bohr magnetons. Phys Rev 104:1197. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.104.1197
Fukuda H, Miyamoto Y, Tomonaga S (1949) On the γ-decay of neutral meson. Progress Theoret Phys 4(3):347–357. https://doi.org/10.1143/ptp/4.3.347
Gordon W (1926) Der Comptoneffekt nach der Schrödingerschen Theorie. Z Physik 40:117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390840
Grant IP (1970) Relativistic calculation of atomic structures. Adv Phys 19:82
Heisenberg W (1927) Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Z Physik 43:172–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280
Huang SZ (2016) Theory of atomic structure. Higher Education Press, p 352 (in Chinese)
Klein O (1926) Quantum theory and five-dimensional theory of relativity (In German and English). Z. Physik. 37:895–906
Kleppner D, Jackiw R (2000) One hundred years of quantum physics. Science 289(5481):893–898. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5481.893
Kusch P, Foley HM (1947) Precision measurement of the ratio of the atomic `g Values’ in the 2P3/2 and 2P1/2 states of gallium. Phys Rev 72:1256. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.72.1256.2
Lamb WE, Retherford RC (1947) Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method. Phys Rev 72:214. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.72.241
Nafe JE, Nelson EB, Rabi II (1947) The hyperfine structure of atomic hydrogen and deuterium. Phys Rev 71:914. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.71.914
Nagel DE, Julian RS, Zacharias JR (1947) The hyperfine structure of atomic hydrogen and deuterium. Phys Rev 72:971. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.72.971
NIST Atomic Spectra Database (2006) Energy Levels Data [DB] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2006.05). http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/AtData/display. Ksh.
Petrmann A (1957) Fourth order magnetic moment of the electron Helu. Phys Acta 30:407–408
Schrödinger E (1926) Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. Ann Phys 384:361–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19263840404
Sommerfeld CM (1957) Magnetic dipole moment of the electron. Phys Rev 107:328
Tomonaga S (1950) Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems. Prog Theor Phys 5:544–569. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.5.4.544
Xu KZ (2006) Advanced atomic and molecular physics. Science Press, p 90 (in Chinese)
Zeilinger A (2000) The quantum centennial. Nature 408:639–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/35047177
Zeng JY (2013) Quantum mechanics. Science Press, p 432 (in Chinese)
Zhu HY (2013) Quantum field theory. Peking University Press, p 234 (in Chinese)
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y. A Novel Two-Particle Steady-State Wave Equation. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Sci 46, 1019–1026 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-022-01284-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-022-01284-8