Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inclusion Measurements in Al–Si Foundry Alloys Using Qualiflash and Prefil Filtration Techniques

  • Published:
International Journal of Metalcasting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Qualiflash is a quick method of assessing the melt cleanliness of foundry Al–Si alloys over a wide range of Si contents up to 17 wt%. It has an immediate response in measuring the quantity of oxides and non-metallic inclusions. Improving the melt cleanliness moves the Quality Temperature Index line toward lower Q values. Prefil curves demonstrate very good sensitivities to the variations in the melt treatment conditions. The filtration rate is greatly affected by grain refiner addition. The highest curve is displayed by the alloy without grain refiner addition. The filtration rate progressively decreases with increasing amount of grain refiner. When the total amount of boron in the grain refiner added to the melt reaches 60 ppm, the filtration rate is approximately nil. The overall error on the Prefil curve is ± 9% at a level of confidence of 95% at any time during the filtration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.E. Gruzleski, B.M. Closset (eds.), The Treatment of Liquid Aluminum–Silicon Alloys (American Foundrymen’s Society, Inc., Des Plaines, IL, 1990), pp. 186–189

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Shivkumar, D. Apelian, H. Bracher, Melt cleanliness in die cast aluminum alloys, in Transactions of the 16th International Die Casting Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 30 Sept–3 Oct (1991), pp. 143–152

  3. P.S. Mohanty, F.H. Samuel, J.E. Grazleski, Studies on addition of inclusions to molten aluminum using a novel technique. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 26B, 103–109 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Langerweger, Non-metallic inclusions as the cause of structural porosity, heterogeneous cell structure and surface cracks in DC cast Al products. Swiss Alum. Ltd. J. 4, 685–705 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.J. Lessiter, Understanding inclusions in aluminum casting. Modern Cast. 83, 29–31 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Doutre, B. Gariépy, J.P. Martin, G. Dubé, Aluminum cleanliness monitoring: methods and applications in process development and quality control. Light Met. 1179–1189 (1985)

  7. K. Strauss (ed.), Applied Science in the Casting of Metals (Pergamum Press, Oxford, 1970), pp. 241–293

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. M.A. Easton, D.H. St John, The effect of grain refinement on the formation of casting defects in alloy 356 casting. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 12, 393–408 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Liu, F.H. Samuel, Assessment of melt cleanliness in A356.2 aluminum casting alloys using the porous disc filtration apparatus technique. J. Mater. Sci. 32, 5927–5944 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Habibi, A.M. Samuel, F.H. Samuel, P. Rochette, D. Paquin, Effect of grain refining and Sr modification on Prefil measurement sensitivity in 356 alloys using electron probe microanalysis technique. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 17(2), 79–87 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F.H. Samuel, P. Ouellet, A.A. Simard, Measurements of oxide films in Al-(6–17) wt% Si foundry alloys using the qualiflash filtration technique. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 12(1), 49–65 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P.K. Singh, D.J. Mitchell, Analysis of metal quality in a low pressure permanent mold foundry, in 105th AFS Casting Congress, Dallas Texas, April 28–May 1 (2001), pp. 88–102

  13. D. Apelian, S. Shivkumar, Molten metal filtration—past, present and future trends, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Molten Aluminum Processing, Orlando, Florida, Nov 6–7, (AFS, Des Plaines, IL, 1989), pp. 1–36

  14. A. Simard, F. Dallaire, J. Proulx, P. Rochette, Cleanliness measurement benchmarks of aluminum alloys obtained directly on—line using the prefil footprinter instrument, Light Met. 379–385 (2000)

  15. P.G. Enright, I.R. Hughes, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Molten Aluminum Processing, Orlando, Florida, Nov 12–14, (American Foundrymen’s Society, Des Plaines, IL, 1995), p. 431

  16. A.M. Samuel, H.W. Doty, S. Valtierra, F.H. Samuel, A metallographic study of grain refining of Sr-modified 356 alloy. Int. J. Metalcast. 11(2), 305–320 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.M. Samuel, H.W. Doty, S. Valtierra, F.H. Samuel, Influence of oxides on porosity formation in Sr-treated alloys. Int. J. Metalcast. 11(4), 729–742 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Dennis, R.A.L. Drew, J.E. Gruzleski, Effect of strontium on the oxidation behavior of an A356 alloy. Alum. Trans. 3, 31–39 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Sandford, Getting the junk out of the molten aluminum. AFS Trans. 105, 95–153 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Maniruzzaman, M. Makhlouf, The removal of solid inclusions from aluminum alloys melts by flotation, in 5th International AFS Conference on Molten Aluminum Processing, Nov 8–10, Orlando (1998), pp. 61–67

  21. L. Liu, A.M. Samuel, F.H. Samuel, H.W. Doty, S. Valtierra, Influence of oxides on porosity formation in Sr-treated Al–Si casting alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 1255–1267 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Amal Samuel for enhancing the images presented in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada

    A. M. Samuel & F. H. Samuel

  2. General Motors, Materials Engineering, Pontiac, MI, USA

    H. W. Doty

  3. Nemak, S.A., Garza Garcia, N.L., Mexico

    S. Valtierra

Authors
  1. A. M. Samuel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. W. Doty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Valtierra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. H. Samuel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. H. Samuel.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figures 14, 15 and Tables 4, 5.

Figure 14
figure 14

%Elongation–% Inclusion relationship.

Full size image
Figure 15
figure 15

Fracture surface of tensile bar showing inclusion distribution in: (a) alloy #1, (b) alloy #7, (c) alloy #A1, (d) alloy #B14.

Full size image
Table 4 Tensile Test Results of 100% Fresh Alloy in the T6 Condition
Full size table
Table 5 Tensile Test Results of 100% Scrap (Crushed Alloy) in the T6 Condition
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samuel, A.M., Doty, H.W., Valtierra, S. et al. Inclusion Measurements in Al–Si Foundry Alloys Using Qualiflash and Prefil Filtration Techniques. Inter Metalcast 12, 625–642 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0185-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0185-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation