Skip to main content
Log in

Concept of Alienation in Hegel’s Social Philosophy

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I made an attempt to discuss how the concept of alienation has been discussed in G.W.F. Hegel’s (1770–1831) social philosophy. In Hegel’s philosophy, alienation is part of the process of self-creativity and self-discovery. According to Hegel, initially our consciousness is alienated from itself. It cannot understand its own true nature. In order to realize its own true nature consciousness’s needs to develop absolute knowledge. The development of consciousness’s absolute knowledge is possible through the overcoming of self-alienation of consciousness. Here, concept of alienation plays an important role in bringing consciousness to the shape of itself called absolute knowing. According to Hegel, consciousness cannot easily know itself with certainty. Consciousness has to develop its self-understanding to fully understand itself. In his discussion of the concept of alienation Hegel compares the dialectic of self-consciousness and consciousness which is not self-realised with the famous dialectic of the lord and the bondsman. It means while discussing the relation of lord and bondsman Hegel compares lord with independent consciousness and bondsman with dependent consciousness. This dialectic of lord and bondsman is sometimes referred to as the dialectic of the master and the slave relationship. In the productive system when everybody regards themselves to be producer and as a member of productive activity, when everybody participates in the large collaborative activity, then there exists no alienation in the society. But when people forget this identity then alienation arises in the society. Hegel thinks that when our consciousness reaches at the stage of itself called Absolute knowledge then it clearly comes to know that it is a differentiated spiritual unity of subjectivity and objectivity. Then it comes to know its own true nature and it overcomes its self-alienation. In the same way in society people overcome their self-alienation when everyone can think themselves to be a part of the whole community. In the present study, I shall deal with how Hegel has applied the concept of alienation in his social philosophy and how does he try to show that through overcoming his alienation a man gets united with the other or the whole community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sayers (2011), p. 1.

  2. Singer (1980), p. 11.

  3. Sayers (2011), p. 2.

  4. Hegel (1998), p. 54.

  5. Taylor (1979), p. 25.

  6. Guha (2006), p. 18.

  7. Hegel (1998), p. 51.

  8. Ibid., p. 55.

  9. Rae (2012), p. 26.

  10. Taylor (1975), p. 90.

  11. Beiser (1993), p. 182.

  12. Beiser (2005), p. 63.

  13. Kant (1929), pp. 135–136.

  14. Hegel (1998), p. 115.

  15. Ibid., p. 113.

  16. Ibid., p. 115.

  17. Ibid., pp. 115–116.

  18. Ibid., p. 116.

  19. Ibid., p. 117.

  20. Ibid.

  21. Ibid., pp. 117–118.

  22. Ibid., pp 118–119.

  23. Ibid., p. 116.

  24. Sembu (2003), p. 262.

  25. Fukuyama (1992), p. 152.

  26. Fukuyama (1992), p. 152.

  27. Taylor (1975), p. 154.

  28. Taylor( 1979), p. 128.

  29. Ibid., p. 131.

  30. O’malley et al. (1973), p. 201.

  31. Ibid.

  32. O’malley et al. (1973), p. 202.

  33. O’malley et al. (1973), p. 202.

  34. Ibid.

  35. Sayers (2011), p. 105.

  36. Ibid.

  37. Ibid., p. 106.

  38. Hegel (1967), p. 52.

  39. Sayers (2011), pp. 106–107.

  40. Hegel (1967), p. 42.

  41. Ibid., p. 237.

  42. policynetwork.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID = 4909&title = james + meade + and + predistribution %3a + 50 + years + before + his + time, Retrieved on 20th July, 2018.

  43. Rawls (1971), pp. xiv–xv.

  44. Rawls (1971), pp. xiv–xv.

  45. Sayers (2011), pp. 107.

  46. Ibid., p. 107.

  47. Khan (1995), p. 42.

  48. Marx (1977), p. 102.

  49. Ibid., p. 8.

  50. Marx and Engels (1944), p. 119.

  51. Hegel (1967), p. 54.

  52. Ibid., p. 53.

  53. Sarma (2014), p. 248.

References

Book

  • Beiser, F. (2005). Hegel. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, F. (1993). The Cambridge companion to hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: The Free Press A Division of Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, A. K. (2006). Types of alienation a marxist approach. Kolkata: Calcutta School of Philosophical Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). Hegel’s philosophy of right (T. M. Knox, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1998). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

  • Kant, I. (1929). Critique of pure reason (Norman Kemp Smith, Trans.). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Khan, N. (1995). Development of the concept and theory of alienation in Marx’s writings. Oslo: Solum Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1977). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1944). Communist manifesto, In R. David (Eds.) With Explanatory Notes, Kolkata: National Book Agencey Private Limited.

  • O’malley, J. J., Algozin, K. W., Kainz, H. P., & Rice, L. G. (Eds.) (1973). The legacy of hegel, Natherlands: The Hague.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice: Revised edition. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, A. J. (2014). Kant and hegel on is–ought dichotomy. Kolkata: Progressive Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, S. (2011). Marx and alienation essays on hegelian themes. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1980). Marx. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1979). Hegel and modern society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Article

  • Rae, G. (2012). Hegel, alienation, and the phenomenological development of consciousness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies,20(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sembu, E. (2003). Hegel’s idea of a ‘struggle for recognition’: The ‘phenomenology of spirit’. In History of political thought (Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 262–281), Imprint Academic Ltd., Summer.

Website

  • policynetwork.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID = 4909&title = james + meade + and + predistribution%3a + 50 + years + before + his + time, Retrieved on 20th July, 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujit Debnath.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Debnath, S. Concept of Alienation in Hegel’s Social Philosophy. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 37, 51–66 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-020-00189-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-020-00189-4

Keywords

Navigation