Abstract
In this paper I made an attempt to discuss how the concept of alienation has been discussed in G.W.F. Hegel’s (1770–1831) social philosophy. In Hegel’s philosophy, alienation is part of the process of self-creativity and self-discovery. According to Hegel, initially our consciousness is alienated from itself. It cannot understand its own true nature. In order to realize its own true nature consciousness’s needs to develop absolute knowledge. The development of consciousness’s absolute knowledge is possible through the overcoming of self-alienation of consciousness. Here, concept of alienation plays an important role in bringing consciousness to the shape of itself called absolute knowing. According to Hegel, consciousness cannot easily know itself with certainty. Consciousness has to develop its self-understanding to fully understand itself. In his discussion of the concept of alienation Hegel compares the dialectic of self-consciousness and consciousness which is not self-realised with the famous dialectic of the lord and the bondsman. It means while discussing the relation of lord and bondsman Hegel compares lord with independent consciousness and bondsman with dependent consciousness. This dialectic of lord and bondsman is sometimes referred to as the dialectic of the master and the slave relationship. In the productive system when everybody regards themselves to be producer and as a member of productive activity, when everybody participates in the large collaborative activity, then there exists no alienation in the society. But when people forget this identity then alienation arises in the society. Hegel thinks that when our consciousness reaches at the stage of itself called Absolute knowledge then it clearly comes to know that it is a differentiated spiritual unity of subjectivity and objectivity. Then it comes to know its own true nature and it overcomes its self-alienation. In the same way in society people overcome their self-alienation when everyone can think themselves to be a part of the whole community. In the present study, I shall deal with how Hegel has applied the concept of alienation in his social philosophy and how does he try to show that through overcoming his alienation a man gets united with the other or the whole community.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Sayers (2011), p. 1.
Singer (1980), p. 11.
Sayers (2011), p. 2.
Hegel (1998), p. 54.
Taylor (1979), p. 25.
Guha (2006), p. 18.
Hegel (1998), p. 51.
Ibid., p. 55.
Rae (2012), p. 26.
Taylor (1975), p. 90.
Beiser (1993), p. 182.
Beiser (2005), p. 63.
Kant (1929), pp. 135–136.
Hegel (1998), p. 115.
Ibid., p. 113.
Ibid., p. 115.
Ibid., pp. 115–116.
Ibid., p. 116.
Ibid., p. 117.
Ibid.
Ibid., pp. 117–118.
Ibid., pp 118–119.
Ibid., p. 116.
Sembu (2003), p. 262.
Fukuyama (1992), p. 152.
Fukuyama (1992), p. 152.
Taylor (1975), p. 154.
Taylor( 1979), p. 128.
Ibid., p. 131.
O’malley et al. (1973), p. 201.
Ibid.
O’malley et al. (1973), p. 202.
O’malley et al. (1973), p. 202.
Ibid.
Sayers (2011), p. 105.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 106.
Hegel (1967), p. 52.
Sayers (2011), pp. 106–107.
Hegel (1967), p. 42.
Ibid., p. 237.
policynetwork.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID = 4909&title = james + meade + and + predistribution %3a + 50 + years + before + his + time, Retrieved on 20th July, 2018.
Rawls (1971), pp. xiv–xv.
Rawls (1971), pp. xiv–xv.
Sayers (2011), pp. 107.
Ibid., p. 107.
Khan (1995), p. 42.
Marx (1977), p. 102.
Ibid., p. 8.
Marx and Engels (1944), p. 119.
Hegel (1967), p. 54.
Ibid., p. 53.
Sarma (2014), p. 248.
References
Book
Beiser, F. (2005). Hegel. New York: Routledge.
Beiser, F. (1993). The Cambridge companion to hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: The Free Press A Division of Macmillan.
Guha, A. K. (2006). Types of alienation a marxist approach. Kolkata: Calcutta School of Philosophical Research.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). Hegel’s philosophy of right (T. M. Knox, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1998). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Kant, I. (1929). Critique of pure reason (Norman Kemp Smith, Trans.). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Khan, N. (1995). Development of the concept and theory of alienation in Marx’s writings. Oslo: Solum Forlag.
Marx, K. (1977). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1944). Communist manifesto, In R. David (Eds.) With Explanatory Notes, Kolkata: National Book Agencey Private Limited.
O’malley, J. J., Algozin, K. W., Kainz, H. P., & Rice, L. G. (Eds.) (1973). The legacy of hegel, Natherlands: The Hague.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice: Revised edition. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sarma, A. J. (2014). Kant and hegel on is–ought dichotomy. Kolkata: Progressive Publishers.
Sayers, S. (2011). Marx and alienation essays on hegelian themes. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Singer, P. (1980). Marx. London: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, C. (1979). Hegel and modern society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Article
Rae, G. (2012). Hegel, alienation, and the phenomenological development of consciousness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies,20(1), 23–42.
Sembu, E. (2003). Hegel’s idea of a ‘struggle for recognition’: The ‘phenomenology of spirit’. In History of political thought (Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 262–281), Imprint Academic Ltd., Summer.
Website
policynetwork.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID = 4909&title = james + meade + and + predistribution%3a + 50 + years + before + his + time, Retrieved on 20th July, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Debnath, S. Concept of Alienation in Hegel’s Social Philosophy. J. Indian Counc. Philos. Res. 37, 51–66 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-020-00189-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-020-00189-4