Abstract
We focus on Arnold and Katti’s application of the Rao–Blackwell theorem to improve preliminary test estimators. The improvement uniformly reduces the mean squared error (MSE) by replacing the pre-test estimator with a suitable conditional expectation. This paper suggests a novel use of the bootstrap to compute the relevant conditional expectation numerically. We illustrate with two econometric estimators. First, a pre-test estimator of the scale elasticity (SCE) for US production of metals. Second, instrumental variables (IV) estimator of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of the Haavelmo model. We use relatively large simulation experiments to show MSE reductions in Rao–Blackwellized pre-test and IV estimators. These illustrations show that one can use our bootstrap version to improve these 2-step estimators, and perhaps others.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, J.C., and S.K. Katti. 1972. An application of the Rao-Blackwell theorem in preliminary test estimators. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 2: 236–238.
Blaug, M. 1962. Economic Theory in Retrospect, Homewood, Illinois: Richard D Irwin, Inc, https://www.amazon.com/Economic-Theory-Retrospect-Mark-Blaug/dp/0521577012.
Brodeur, A., N. Cook, and A. Heyes. 2020. Methods matter: p-Hacking and publication bias in causal analysis in economics. American Economic Review 110 (11): 3634–3660.
Clark, S. J. and B. Houle. 2012. Evaluation of Heckman Selection Model Method for Correcting Estimates of HIV Prevalence from Sample Surveys. Working paper 120, Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington.
Efron, B. 2004. The estimation of prediction error: covariance penalties and cross-validation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 619–642.
Greene, W. 2008. Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
Heckman, J.J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153–161.
Rao, C.R. 1973. Linear Statistical Inference And Its Applications, 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.
Toomet, O. and A. Henningsen. 2008. Sample Selection Models in R: Package sampleSelection. Journal of Statistical Software, 27. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v27/i07/.
Vinod, H. 2020a. What’s the big idea? Ridge regression and regularization. Significance 17: 41.
Vinod, H.D. 2008. Hands-on Intermediate Econometrics Using R: Templates for Extending Dozens of Practical Examples. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific. ISBN 10-981-281-885-5, Second edition is now in press. https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/6895
Vinod, H.D. 2020. Software-illustrated explanations of Econometrics Contributions by CR Rao for his 100-th birthday. Journal of Quantitative Economics, New Series 18 (2): 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-020-00209-9.
Vinod, H.D. 2022. Kernel regression coefficients for practical significance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15010032.
Vinod, H. D. and López-de-Lacalle, J. (2009),“Maximum Entropy Bootstrap for Time Series: The meboot R Package,” Journal of Statistical Software, 29:1–19. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v29/i05/.
Vinod, H.D., and A. Ullah. 1981. Recent Advances in Regression Methods. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Wasserstein, R.L., A.L. Schirm, and N.A. Lazar. 2019. Moving to a World Beyond p less than 0.05. The American Statistician 73: 1–19.
Wu, D.-M. 1973. Alternative Tests of Independence Between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances. Econometrica 77 (5): 733–750.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Many helpful comments by T. Krishna Kumar have helped improve the paper.
Prepared for the special issue of Journal of Quantitative Economics in honor of Prof. C. R. Rao.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vinod, H.D. Bootstrap Version of Rao–Blackwellization to Two-Step and Instrumental Variable Estimators. J. Quant. Econ. 20 (Suppl 1), 49–69 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-022-00303-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-022-00303-0