Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Nature of Problematical Situations: Developing Cynefin from an Information Processing Perspective

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study contributes to developing a pragmatic constructivist framework for detecting the nature of real-world’s problems. To do so, we developed a framework that appreciates factual and logical aspects of reality and considers the values of actors participating in the situation using their communication. This occurs by integrating contingency theory and sense-making theory, which utilize rational and discursive inference mechanisms, respectively. In order to effectively cope with the complexity of understanding problems’ nature, it is suggested to use rational and discursive mechanisms in complement. To do so, in this study, organizational information processing theory (OIPT) from contingency theory was utilized to enrich the Cynefin framework stemming from sense-making theory. Then, we used qualitative conceptual analysis to investigate Cynefin papers in a deductive-inductive way to develop the evolved Cynefin framework. The rationality of OIPT improves the analytical capabilities of Cynefin. Additionally, OIPT’s contextual factors facilitate structuring debate sessions to reach a consensus. Cynefin helps us extract contextual narrations, which enables the acquisition of new knowledge. OIPT tries to extract actors’ existing explicit and tacit knowledge. Finally, the developed framework is validated by utilizing it in the field of business process management and discussing how it helps problem-solvers make sense of their processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abubakar, A. M., H. Elrehail, M. A. Alatailat, and A. Elçi. 2019. Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 4 (2): 104–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubry, M., and M. Lavoie-Tremblay. 2018. Rethinking organizational design for managing multiple projects. International Journal of Project Management 36 (1): 12–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D., and G. Fitzgerald. 2006. Information systems development: methodologies, techniques and tools. McGraw-Hill.

  • Berg, T., and R. Pooley. 2013. Rich pictures: Collaborative communication through icons. Systemic Practice and Action Research 26 (4): 361–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9238-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, E. H., L. A. Curry, and K. J. Devers. 2007. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research 42 (4): 1758–1772. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D., I. Colville, and A. Pye. 2014. Making Sense of Sensemaking in Organization Studies. Organization studies 36 (2): 265–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D., I. Colville, and A. Pye. 2015. Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization studies 36 (2): 265–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. M., B. Obel, and D. D. Håkonsson. 2020. Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach (4th Edition ed.): Cambridge University Press.

  • Checkland, P., and S. Holwell. 2004. ‘Classical’ OR and ‘Soft’ OR-an asymmetric complementarity. In Systems modeling: theory and practice, ed. M. Pidd, 45–60. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., and J. Poulter. 2006. Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioner, teachers, and students. vol. 26. Wiley Chichester.

  • Davenport, T. H. 2015. Process management for knowledge work. In Handbook on business process management 1, 17–35. Springer.

  • Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. H. Holt.

  • Donaldson, L. 1996. For Positivist Organization Theory. SAGE Publications.

  • Donaldson, L. 2006. The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunities. In Organization design (Vol, eds. R. M. Burton, D. D. Håkonsson, B. Eriksen, and C. C. Snow, 6, 19–40. Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, V. 2010. Learning capability: the effect of existing knowledge on learning. Knowledge Management Research Practice 8 (4): 369–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2010.15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, M., M. L. Rosa, J. Mendling, and H. A. Reijers. 2018. Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonstone, J. 2014. On the nature of problems in action learning. Action Learning: research practice 11 (1): 25–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2013.870879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S. 2013. Cynefin, statistics and decision analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 64 (4): 547–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. 1973. Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

  • Galbraith, J. R. 1974. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4 (3): 28–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.3.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillberg, C., and L. C. Vo. 2014. Contributions from Pragmatist Perspectives towards an Understanding of Knowledge and Learning in Organisations. Philosophy of Management 13 (2): 33–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/pom201413210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafizadeh, P., and F. Ghamkhari. 2019. Elicitation of Tacit Knowledge Using Soft Systems Methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research 32 (5): 521–555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9472-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafizadeh, P., and M. Mehrabioun. 2018. Application of SSM in tackling problematical situations from academicians’ viewpoints. Systemic Practice and Action Research 31 (2): 179–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9422-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafizadeh, P., M. Mehrabioun, and A. Mostasharirad. 2020. The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Solution of Soft Systems Methodology. Philosophy of Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00149-7.

  • Hanafizadeh, P., M. Moosakhani, and J. Bakhshi. 2009. Selecting the best strategic practices for business process redesign. Business Process Management Journal 15 (4): 609–627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150910975561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haußmann, C., Y. K. Dwivedi, K. Venkitachalam, and M. D. Williams. 2012. A summary and review of Galbraith’s organizational information processing theory. In Information Systems Theory, eds. Y. Dwivedi, M. Wade, and S. Schneberger, 71–93. Springer.

  • Jackson, M. 2019. Critical systems thinking and the management of complexity: responsible leadership for a complex world. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1907. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Dover Publications.

  • Jonassen, D. H. 1997. Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational technology research development 45 (1): 65–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. 2000. Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research development 48 (4): 63–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangai, C. 2012. Social research methods in higher education: A critical analysis of methodological issues and emerging trends at the Zimbabwe Open University. In A. López-Varela (Ed.), Theoretical Methodological Approaches to Social Sciences Knowledge Management (Vol. 1).

  • Kurtz, C. F., and D. J. Snowden. 2003. The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM systems journal 42 (3): 462–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, E. A., D. Hill, and M. R. Harvey. 2014. A synthesis of leadership theories and styles. Journal of Management Policy & Practice 15 (2): 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenberg, S., and H. Wesseling. 2016. Making Sense of Weick’s Organising. A Philosophical Exploration. Philosophy of Management 15 (3): 221–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-016-0040-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorino, P. 2018. Pragmatism and Organization Studies. Oxford University Press.

  • Mani, D., A. Barua, and A. Whinston. 2010. An empirical analysis of the impact of information capabilities design on business process outsourcing performance. MIS quarterly 34 (1): 39–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20721414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J. 2021. Pragmatism of Understanding and Interpretation. The American Sociologist 52 (4): 782–797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09499-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. 2000. Variety is the spice of life: combining soft and hard OR/MS methods. International Transactions in Operational Research 7 (6): 673–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and J. Brocklesby. 1997. Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega 25 (5): 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

  • Nørreklit, H. 2017. A Philosophy of Management Accounting: A Pragmatic Constructivist Approach. Taylor & Francis.

  • Nørreklit, H., L. Nørreklit, and F. Mitchell. 2007. Theoretical conditions for validity in accounting performance measurement. In Business performance measurement (pp. 179–217).

  • Northouse, P. G. 2019. Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th edition ed.): SAGE Publications, Inc.

  • Pidd, M. 2004. Complementarity in Systems Modelling. In M. Pidd (Ed.), Systems modelling: Theory and Practice (Vol. 1, pp. 20).

  • Pidd, M. 2009. Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science. 3rd ed. Wiley.

  • Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday.

  • Pollack, J. 2009. Multimethodology in series and parallel: strategic planning using hard and soft OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60 (2): 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. 2011. ABC of Action Learning. Gower.

  • Ringberg, T., and M. Reihlen. 2008. Towards a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer. Journal of Management Studies 45 (5): 912–935. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00757.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., C. Tebaldi, and S. Potì. 2010. The Discursive Dynamic of Sensemaking. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout-Yagodzynski, & J. Clegg (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science (pp. 39–72).

  • Seal, W., and R. Mattimoe. 2017. A Pragmatic Constructivist Perspective on Sensemaking in Management Control. In H. Nørreklit (Ed.), A Philosophy of Management Accounting: A Pragmatic Constructivist Approach (pp. 260–271).

  • Snowden, D. 2000. Cynefin: a sense of time and space, the social ecology of knowledge management. In Knowledge Horizons: The Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management, eds. C. Despres, and D. Chauvel, 237–265. Butterworth Heinemann.

  • Snowden, D. 2001. Narrative Patterns: The Perils and Possibilities of using Story in Organisations. In Creating Value with Knowledge: Insights from the IBM Institute for Business Value, eds. E. Lesser, and L. Prusak, 201–216. Oxford University Press.

  • Snowden, D. 2002. Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of knowledge management 6 (2): 100–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210424639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D., and M. Boone. 2007. A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard business review 85 (11): 69–76 + 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D., and Z. Goh. 2020. Cynefin - Weaving Sense-Making into the Fabric of Our World (eds. R. Greenberg, and B. Bertsch): Cognitive Edge Pte Ltd.

  • Stacey, R. D. 1996. Complexity and Creativity in Organizations. (First ed.): Berrett-Koehler.

  • Statler, M., and P. Salovaara. 2017. Pragmatic Truths in Organization Studies. Philosophy of Management 16 (3): 265–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0068-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szelągowski, M. 2019. Dynamic Business Process Management in the Knowledge Economy: Creating Value from Intellectual Capital. Vol. 71. Springer.

  • Szelągowski, M. 2021. The knowledge and process dimensions. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 51 (2): 271–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2019-0150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szelągowski, M., and J. Berniak-Woźny. 2019. The knowledge and process continuum. Knowledge Process Management 26 (4): 308–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trkman, P. 2010. The critical success factors of business process management. International journal of information management 30 (2): 125–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., and D. A. Nadler. 1978. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of management review 3 (3): 613–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W. M. P. 2016. Process Mining: Data Science in Action. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke, J., S. Zelt, and T. Schmiedel. 2016. On the role of context in business process management. International journal of information management 36 (3): 486–495. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., and R. T. Watson. 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly 26 (2): xiii-xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. SAGE Publications.

  • Weick, K. E. 2009. Making Sense of the Organization, Volume 2: The Impermanent Organization. Wiley.

  • Weick, K. E., and K. M. Sutcliffe. 2015. Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World. Wiley.

  • Wilson, B. 2001. Soft Systems Methodology Conceptual Model Building and its Contribution. Wiley.

  • Wu, Y., W. Wang, and X. Zhang. 2021. Enhancing Hospital Performance: the role of interfirm dynamic capabilities from the information processing view. Journal of Decision Systems, 122(ahead-of-print), 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1947945.

  • Yoo, D. K. 2011. Sense-making view of knowledge management: Theoretical development and empirical validation. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management 10 (01): 37–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S021964921100281X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelt, S., J. Recker, T. Schmiedel, and J. vom Brocke. 2018a. Development and validation of an instrument to measure and manage organizational process variety. PloS one 13 (10): e0206198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelt, S., J. Recker, T. Schmiedel, and J. vom Brocke. 2019. A theory of contingent business process management. Business Process Management Journal 25 (6): 1291–1316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2018-0129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelt, S., T. Schmiedel, and J. vom Brocke. 2018b. Understanding the nature of processes: an information-processing perspective. Business Process Management Journal 24 (1): 67–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2016-0102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., S. Yongchareon, and N.-W. Cho. 2021. Enabling situational awareness of business processes. Business Process Management Journal 27 (3): 779–795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2020-0331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, West End Hemmat Highway, Dehkadeh-ye-Olympic, Tehran, Iran

    Payam Hanafizadeh

  2. Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, West End Hemmat Highway, Dehkadeh-ye-Olympic, Tehran, Iran

    Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Bahadornia

Authors
  1. Payam Hanafizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Bahadornia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Payam Hanafizadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all author(s), the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanafizadeh, P., Bahadornia, S.M.M. On the Nature of Problematical Situations: Developing Cynefin from an Information Processing Perspective. Philosophy of Management 22, 25–49 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00206-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00206-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation