Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond the Indus: How Hinduism Offers an Alternate Management Paradigm

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management is presently under intense scrutiny and criticism for its simplistic objective of enhancing shareholders’ wealth, and for lacking the ability of integrating plurality, inclusivity, and ethical conduct. Most western management principles are based on theoretically deducted cause-effect relationships, and on structured planning towards a single purpose, using relatively standardized frameworks, processes and ways of thinking. However, the complexities of management require cognition of interdependencies and the ability to deal with ambiguity, and thus needs a new paradigm that moves away from the present reductionist doctrine towards an holistic framework that is adaptable and integrative. However, such a transformation requires a completely distinct ideology based on a heterodoxy that syncretises purpose-oriented approach with the present profit-oriented approach. This paper proposes that Hinduism is ideally positioned to offer such a heterodoxy. In Hinduism, the connotation for management is more a process of selection from amongst the myriad choices along multiple levels, based on inductive and supplemented by deductive logic, and mostly devoid of any absolutes or singularity in process. Under Hinduism's influence, the ‘Indian way’ is a hybrid of individualistic, collective and context sensitive ways of thinking, that sets it apart from other cultures, and thus is uniquely positioned to offer an alternative management paradigm for today’s world. This paper will present how the values and norms embedded in the philosophy and religious principles of Hinduism, evolved and continue to influence Indian management thinking and behaviour, and how the lessons from the ‘Indian way’ might contribute towards the development of an alternative management paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addepalli, S. 2009. Operating models for competing in a multi-polar world. Washington, DC.

  • Agarwala, P.N. 2001. A comprehensive history of business in India from 3000 B.C. to 2000 A.D. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj, V. 2011. Galloping growth, and hunger. New York Times 1.

  • Bhide, A. 1986. Hustle as strategy. Harvard Business Review 64(5): 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P., H. Singh, J. Singh, and M. Useem. 2010. The india way : How India’s top business leaders are revolutionizing management. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, F. 1991. The journal of commonwealth & comparative politics. Volume 29. Taylor & Francis.

  • Chandler, A.D. 1962. Strategy and structure chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S.R. 2009. Managerial ethos of the Indian tradition: Relevance of a wisdom model. Journal of Indian Business Research 1(2/3): 136–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M., and R. Alm. 2009. China and India: Two paths to prosperity. Monthly Labor Review 132(1): 40–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, G. 2010. The difficulty of being good: On the subtle art of dharma. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., C. Mathur, & F. J. Richter. 2005. India rising: Emergence of a new world power. Marshall Cavendish Business.

  • de La Fontaine, Jean. 1678. Je dirai par reconnaissance que j’en dois la plus grande partie à Pilpay sage indien. Avertissement (preface) to the Second Compilation of Fables.

  • Dhand, A. 2002. The dharma of ethics, the ethics of dharma: Quizzing the ideals of Hinduism. Journal of Religious Ethics 30: 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druhl, K., J. Langstaff, and N. Monson. 2001. Towards a synthesis of the classical and quantum paradigms: Vedic science as a holistic approach to organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 14(4): 379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, F. 1965. The Panchatantra translated in 1924 from the Sanskrit. NY: A. S. Barnes and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, G.W., O.P. Dhingra, and N.C. Aggarwal. 1974. The manager and the man. Kent: Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, H. 1978. Quellen des pancatantra (freiburger beitrage zur indologie) (German edition) Harrassowitz; 1. Aufl edition.

  • Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giridharadas, A. 2010. India calling: An intimate portrait of a nation’s remaking. Schwartz Publishing Pty, Limited.

  • Gollakota, K., and V. Gupta. 2006. History, ownership forms and corporate governance in India. Journal of Management History 12(2): 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guirdham, M. 1999. Communicating across cultures. Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.T. 1976. Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmeling, S., S. Sarasvathy, and R. Freeman. 2009. Related debates in ethics and entrepreneurship: Values, opportunities, and contingency. Journal of Business Ethics 84(3): 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hee, C.C.H. 2007. A holistic approach to business management: perspectives from the Bhagavad Gita. Singapore Management Review 29(1): 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, J. (1915). The Panchatantra: A collection of ancient Hindu tales in its oldest recension, the Kashmirian, entitled Tantrakhyayika; the original Sanskrit text. The Harvard University press.

  • Hindery, R. 1978. Comparative ethics in Hindu and Buddhist traditions. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtom, B. C., E. C. Dierdorff, and Graduate Management Admission Council. 2013. Disrupt or be disrupted: A blueprint for change in management education. Wiley Publishing.

  • Immelt, J.R., V. Govindarajan, and C. Trimble. 2009. How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review 87(10): 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. 2001. Strategy as improvisational theater. MIT Sloan Management Review 43: 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T. 2007. Billions of entrepreneurs: How China and India are reshaping their futures—and yours. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoja, F., and S. Maranville. 2010. How do firms nurture absorptive capacity? Journal of Managerial Issues 22(2): 262–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, A. 2010. The life’s work of a thought leader. Strategy + Business

  • Kling, B.B. 1966. The origin of the managing agency system in India. The Journal of Asian Studies 26(1): 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. 2008. Internationalization of Indian enterprises: Patterns, strategies, ownership advantages, and implications. Asian Economic Policy Review 3(2): 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. 2009. The Indian mystique. Business Strategy Review 20(3): 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N.S., and U.S. Rao. 1996. Guidelines for value based management in Kausalya’s Arthashastra. Journal of Business Ethics 15(4): 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., and A.K. Sethi. 2005. Doing business in India: A guide for western managers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., P.K. Mohapatra, and S. Chandrasekhar. 2009. India’s global powerhouses: How they are taking on the world. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurien, V. 2004. Management paradigms beyond profit maximization. Vikalpa 29(3): 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laungani, P. 1999. Cultural influences on identity and behavior. In Personality and person perception across cultures, ed. Y.T. Lee, C.R. McCauley, and J.G. Draguns, 191–212. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E. 1966. Has India an economic future? Foreign Affairs 44(2): 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1995. Social systems; soziale systeme. English. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H.R., and S. Kitayama. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Pyschological Rseview 108: 291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. 2012. Management ethics: Placing ethics at the core of good management. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, A., and B. Harshav. 2004. Hinduism: Past and present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 2004. Managers, not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development (1st ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  • Mintzberg, H. 2009. Managing. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I., and J. Sanzgiri. 2009. Deep stakeholders—reading cultures. International Journal of Learning and Change 3(4): 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, D.T. 1998. Creative action as a dynamic strategy: Using imagination to improve strategic solutions in unstable environments. Journal of Business Research 41(1): 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polgreen, L. 2010. In India, hitching hopes on a subway. New York Times

  • Polgreen, L., and H. Kumar. 2010. New business class rises in ashes of south India’s caste system. New York Times.

  • Prabhupada, B.S. 1972. Bhagawad Gita as it is. New Delhi: McMillan Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., and A. Hammond. 2002. Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review 80(9): 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, C. 2000. Panchatantra: The globe-trotting classic of India. Bookbird 38(4): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, A. 1988. In search of self in India and Japan: Toward a cross cultural psychology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, S., and O. Shenkar. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review 10(3): 435–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, A.W. 1925. The Panchatantra. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2005. The argumentative Indian. Writings on Indian culture, history and identity. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sihag, B.S. 2004. Kautilya on the scope and methodology of accounting, organizational design and the role of ethics in ancient India. The Accounting Historians Journal 31(2): 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. 2008. Tight rope walk at Tata steel: Balancing profits and CSR. South Asian Journal of Management 15(1): 118–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.K., and A. Chaudhuri. 2009. The reality of India: Folding constraints into business strategy. Journal of Business Strategy 30(4): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J.B.P. 1980. The nurturant task leader. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B. P. 2005. Facets of Indian culture. Unpublished manuscript from www.kat.gr/kat/history/rel/hinduism.htm.

  • Sinha, J.B.P., and R.N. Kanungo. 1997. Context sensitivity and balancing in Indian organizational behavior. International Journal of Psychology 32: 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J.B.P., N. Vohra, S. Singhal, R.B.N. Sinha, and S. Ushashree. 2002. Normative predictions of collectivist-individualist intentions and behavior of Indians. International Journal of Psychology 37: 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.H., and C.R. Sunstein. 2003. Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review 93(2): 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, H. 2010. Hopes fade for success of commonwealth games in India. New York Times.

  • Timmons, H., and H. Kumar. 2010. Frustrations aside, Indians bask in opening of games. New York Times 4.

  • Triandis, H.C., and D.P.S. Bhawuk. 1997. Culture theory and the meaning of relatedness. In New perspectives in international industrial organizational psychology, ed. P.C. Earley and M. Erez, 13–52. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J.D. 2000. Harmony and order in Indian religious traditions: Hinduism. In Research in human social conflict, ed. J.B. Gittler and J. Bertram, 81–102. Connecticut: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yardley, J., and H. Kumar. 2011. Where growth and dysfunction have no boundaries. New York Times 1.

  • Zakaria, F. 2008. The post-American world. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on my work for Encyclopédie de la stratégie titled «Stratégies de pensée Indienne: mise en abyme des pluralistes et multi-contextuel ». I am also grateful for the feedback from the participants at the Philosophy of Management 2015, and finally to Anindo Bhattacharjee, but for those steady encouragement, this paper would not have been written at all.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujit Sur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sur, S. Beyond the Indus: How Hinduism Offers an Alternate Management Paradigm. Philosophy of Management 16, 69–89 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-016-0049-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-016-0049-3

Keywords

Navigation