Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Seasonal Changes on a Hybrid Soil–Geofoam Embankment System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of climatic variations on the performance of the bridge infrastructure were not adequately addressed. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the effect of seasonal temperature and precipitation variations on a bridge infrastructure located in Johnson County, Texas. This bridge has undergone a rehabilitation process by partially replacing the embankment soil with lightweight expanded polystyrene geofoam (EPS geofoam) to reduce bridge approach slab settlements. Four years of monitored vertical deformation and pressure cell data from the field instrumentation was used to analyze the performance of the bridge slab and adjoining roadway pavement system. From the analysis, it was observed that the vertical pressures and total deformations were increased with an increase in temperature and were decreased with a decrease in temperature. Also, with an increase in the temperature, it was observed that the bridge retaining wall exerted lateral pressure on the geofoam blocks and with a decrease in temperature the pressures decreased considerably. This study highlights the observations made on the bridge approach slab and adjoining roadway pavement vertical deformations with respect to temperature and precipitation variations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruttanaporamakul P, Puppala AJ, Pedarla A, Bheemasetti TV, Williammee RS (2016) Settlement mitigation of a distressed embankment in Texas by utilization of lightweight EPS geofoam material. In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-4179)

  2. Briaud JL, James RW, Hoffman SB (1997) NCHRP synthesis 234: settlement of bridge approaches (the bump at the end of the bridge). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicks JE, Briaud JL (2007) Preliminary evaluation of the bump at the end of the railway bridge. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference and the ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division, March 13, 2007-March 16 (pp 227–240)

  4. Hopkins TC (1969) Settlement of highway bridge approaches and embankment foundations. Report No. KYHPR-64-17; HPR-1(4), Kentucky Transportation Center, Lexington

  5. Seo JB (2005) The bump at the end of the bridge: an investigation. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  6. Yasrobi SY, Ng KW, Edgar TV, Menghini M (2016) Investigation of approach slab settlement for highway infrastructure. Transp Geotech 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiagarajan G, Gopalaratnam V, Halmen C, Ajgaonkar S, Ma S, Gudimetla B, Chamarthi R (2010) Bridge approach slabs for Missouri DOT: looking at alternative and cost efficient approaches (No. OR 11.009)

  8. Saride S, Puppala AJ, Archeewa E (2009) Bridge approach settlements—an issue due to design or construction practices? The University of Texas at Arlington, pp 210–214

  9. White DJ, Mekkawy MM, Sritharan S, Suleiman MT (2007) “Underlying” causes for settlement of bridge approach pavement systems. J Perform Constr Facil 21(4):273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart CF (1985) Highway structure approaches. FHWA/CA/SD-85-05. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento

  11. Puppala AJ, Saride S, Archeewa E, Nazarian S, Williammee R Jr (2010) Bridge approach settlements: lessons learned from present case studies and ground improvement solutions. Ground Improvement and Geosynthetics (pp 228–238)

  12. Tadros MK, Benak JV (1989) Bridge abutment and approach slab settlement. Phase 1. Final report (No. RES1 (0099) P433)

  13. Wahls HE (1990) Design and construction of bridge approaches, vol 159. Transportation Research Board

  14. Mahmood IU (1991) Evaluation of causes of bridge approach settlement and development of settlement prediction models

  15. Kramer SL, Sajer P (1991) Bridge approach slab effectiveness. Final technical report (No. WA-RD 227.1)

  16. Puppala AJ, Saride S, Archeewa E, Hoyos LR, Nazarian S (2009) Recommendations for design, construction, and maintenance of bridge approach slabs: synthesis report. Rep 6022–6021

  17. Chen YT, Chai YH (2010) Experimental study on the performance of approach slabs under deteriorating soil washout conditions. J Bridge Eng 16(5):624–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farnsworth CB, Bartlett SF, Negussey D, Stuedlein AW (2008) Rapid construction and settlement behavior of embankment systems on soft foundation soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(3):289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicks JE (2009) The bump at the end of the railway bridge. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University

  20. Long J, Olson S, Stark T, Samara E (1998) Differential movement at embankment-bridge structure interface in Illinois. Transp Res Rec 1633:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mishra D, Tutumluer E, Stark TD, Hyslip JP, Chrismer SM, Tomas M (2012) Investigation of differential movement at railroad bridge approaches through geotechnical instrumentation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 13(11):814–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Horvath JS (2000) Integral-abutment bridges: problems and innovative solutions using EPS geofoam and other geosynthetics. Res. Rpt. No. CE/GE-00-2

  23. Horvath JS (2005) Integral-abutment bridges: geotechnical problems and solutions using geosynthetics and ground improvement. West Virginia University

  24. Dupont B, Allen DL (2002) Movements and settlements of highway bridge approaches, Kentucky Transportation Center. Research report, KTC-02-18/SPR-220-00-1F

  25. Abu-Hejleh N, Hanneman D, White DJ, Wang T, Ksouri I (2006) Flowfill and MSE bridge approaches: performance, coast, and recommendations for improvements (No. CDOT-DTD-R-2006-2). Colorado Department of Transportation, Research Branch

  26. Hsi J (2008) Bridge approach embankments supported on concrete injected columns. GeoCongress 2008: geosustainability and geohazard mitigation, pp 612–619

  27. Bartlett SF, Lawton EC, Farnsworth CB, Newman MP (2012) Design and evaluation of expanded polystyrene geofoam embankments for the I-15 reconstruction project, Salt Lake City, Utah (No. UT-12.19)

  28. Bartlett S, Negussey D, Kimble M, Sheeley M (2000) Use of geofoam as super-lightweight fill for I-15 reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 79th Annual Meeting. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

  29. Negussey D, Stuedlein AW (2003) Geofoam fill performance monitoring. Utah Dept. of Transportation, Rep. No. UT-3

  30. Newman MP, Bartlett SF, Lawton EC (2009) Numerical modeling of geofoam embankments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(2):290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stark TD, Arellano D, Horvath JS, Leshchinsky D (2004) Geofoam applications in the design and construction of highway embankments (No. NCHRP Project 24-11)

  32. Jutkofsky W, Sung J, Negussey D (2000) Stabilization of embankment slope with geofoam. Transp Res Rec 1736:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koerner RM (2012) Designing with geosynthetics, vol 1. Xlibris Corporation

  34. Birhan A (2014) Effect of confinement and temperature on the behavior of EPS geofoam. Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University

  35. Horvath JS (1994) Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: an introduction to material behavior. Geotext Geomembr 13(4):263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zou Y, Leo CJ, Wong H (2013) Time dependent viscoelastic behaviour of Eps geofoam. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol 330. Trans Tech Publications, pp 1095–1099

  37. Zou Y, Leo CJ (2001) Compressive behavior of EPS geofoam at elevated temperatures. School of Engineering and Industrial Design, University of Western Sydney

  38. Acharya R, Bheemasetti TV, Ruttanaporamakul P, Chittoori B, Puppala AJ (2014) Numerical modeling of a highway embankment using geofoam material as partial fill replacement. Geo-Congress 2014: geo-characterization and modeling for sustainability, pp 2986–2995

  39. ASTM D 6817-07. Standard specification for rigid cellular polystyrene geofoam. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania

  40. Slope Indicator (2005) Digitilt inclinometer probe. Data sheet. Durham Geo Slope Indicator. http://www.slopeindicator.com/pdf/digitilt-vertical-inclinometer-probedatasheet.pdf

  41. Puppala AJ, Manosuthkij T, Nazarian S, Hoyos LR, Chittoori B (2011) In situ matric suction and moisture content measurements in expansive clay during seasonal fluctuations. Geotech Test J 35:74–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) under Project No. 5-6022-03. The authors would like to acknowledge Richard Williammee, Joe Adams and other project committee members for providing their assistance with various project activities related to construction, instrumentation, and monitoring. We would also like to acknowledge the former graduate students and the colleagues for providing their assistance in the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19308, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA

    Ali Shafikhani, Tejo V. Bheemasetti & Anand J. Puppala

Authors
  1. Ali Shafikhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tejo V. Bheemasetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anand J. Puppala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand J. Puppala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shafikhani, A., Bheemasetti, T.V. & Puppala, A.J. Effect of Seasonal Changes on a Hybrid Soil–Geofoam Embankment System. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 3, 39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0116-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0116-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation