Skip to main content
Log in

Reconceptualizing the teaching of ethics in a global classroom

  • Published:
International Journal of Ethics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational courses and professional trainings in ethical leadership and decision making appear to be increasing globally. Many scholars and academicians view that ethics cannot be taught due to a lack of consensus, consistency, and global standardization of what is ethical. Often the leading resources and educational material are arguably grounded in values and norms, which may not be in harmony with the values and norms of target audiences in various international, and domestic settings where classrooms may have a global student body. Varying demographics, backgrounds, and life experiences have a profound influence on what shapes someone’s view of right and wrong. Consequently, an ethical dilemma may form for the educator who is aware that the audience’s background, culture and norms may not support the ethical decisions outlined in the required teaching material.

This article conceptualizes competency development as a means of teaching ethics in global classrooms. Developing competencies for teaching ethics involves acknowledging multiple perspectives, which allows deeper reflection upon an individual’s ethical values and enhances the ability to acknowledge an ethical issue first, then proceed through an optimizing process for resolve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Branson, C.M. 2007. Improving leadership by nurturing moral consciousness through structured self-reflection. Journal of Educational Administration 45 (4): 471–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. 2011. Ethical and moral matters in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (1): 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzelli, C., and B. Johnston. 2001. Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (8): 873–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane, A. (1994). A challenge which cannot be ignored. Financial Times, p. 1.

  • Freire, P. 1998. Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach the edge, critical studies in educational theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. 2003. The abandoned generation: Democracy beyond the culture of fear. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. 1988. The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, M.Z., and C.E. Johnson. 2002. Leadership: A communication perspective. 4th ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husu, J., and K. Tirri. 2003. A case study approach to study one teacher’s moral reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (3): 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L.E., and A.J. Reiman. 2007. Beginning teacher disposition: Examining the moral/ethical domain. Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (5): 676–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, R.M. 1995. How good people make tough choices. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, P. 2009. Should ‘ought’ be taught? Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (7): 983–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L.L. 1981, November. Ethics without the sermon. Harvard Business Review 59: 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2002). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved September 4, 2013, from http://www.nbpts.org.

  • Noddings, N. 2003. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M.J. 2004. Ethics for the information age. UK: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, W. J. (1996). The ASTD models for human performance improvement: Roles, competencies, and outputs. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

  • Roubanis, J.L., S.F. Garner, and R.S. Purcell. 2008. Professionalism: Ethical decision making as a foundation for professional practice. Journal of Family Consumer Sciences Education 26 (National Teacher Standards 2): 25–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, P. 1995. Competency based assessment. Melbourne, Australia: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J.P., and J.A. Stefkovich. 2005. Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying.theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelkin, J. (n.d.). Resources opportunities: International proposal (resources). Retrieved may 25, 2012 from. Estrella Mountain Community College, International Education Web site: http://www.emc.maricopa.edu/academics/international/ClassResources.html.

  • Smith, T. F. (2006). Exemplary performance in four areas of expertise in workplace learning and performance. (WLP): A critical incident analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.

  • Sockett, H., and P. LePage. 2002. The missing language of the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (2): 34–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. S. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley.

  • The Arbinger Institute. (2010). Leadership and self-deception: Getting out of the box. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

  • Villegas, A.M., and T. Lucas. 2002. Educating culturally responsive teachers. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, D. (2005). Leadership: Responding to ethical dilemmas. Educators’ Notebook, 17(1). Department of Educational Administration, Foundations and Psychology, University of Manitoba, and the Manitoba Council for Leadership in Education.

  • Ward, S. (2019). Intercultural competence: From theory to practice [Webinar presentation]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arSdlaP3b_U&feature=youtu.be

  • Weston, A. 2003. Beyond intrinsic value: Pragmatism in environmental ethics. In Environmental ethics: An anthology, ed. A. Light and H. Rolston III. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shakoor Ward.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, S. Reconceptualizing the teaching of ethics in a global classroom. International Journal of Ethics Education 5, 39–50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-020-00087-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-020-00087-y

Keywords

Navigation