Skip to main content
Log in

Curves on surfaces of mixed characteristic

  • Research Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classification of foliated surfaces (McQuillan in Pure Appl Math Q 4(3):877–1012, 2008) is applied to the study of curves on surfaces with big co-tangent bundle and varying moduli, be it purely in characteristic zero, or, more generally when the characteristic is mixed. Almost everything that one might naively imagine is true, but with one critical exception: rational curves on bi-disc quotients which aren’t quotients of products of curves are Zariski dense in mixed characteristic. The logical repercussions in characteristic zero of this exception are not negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Autissier, P., Chambert-Loir, A., Gasbarri, C.: On the canonical degrees of curves in varieties of general type. Geom. Funct. Anal. 22(5), 1051–1061 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baum, P., Bott, R.: Singularities of holomorphic foliations. J. Differ. Geom. 7(3–4), 279–342 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogomolov, F.A.: Families of curves on a surface of general type. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 236(5), 1041–1044 (1977) (in Russian)

  4. Brunella, M.: Courbes entières et feuilletages holomorphes. Enseign. Math. 45(1–2), 195–216 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brunella, M.: Plurisubharmonic variation of the leafwise Poincaré metric. Internat. J. Math. 14(2), 139–151 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Duval, J.: Sur le lemme de Brody. Invent. Math. 173(2), 305–314 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekedahl, T.: Foliations and inseparable morphisms. In: Bloch, S.J. (ed.) Algebraic Geometry. Bowdoin 1985. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 46.2, pp. 139–149. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1987)

  8. Ekedahl, T.: Canonical models of surfaces of general type in positive characteristic. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 67, 97–144 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ekedahl, T., Shepherd-Barron, N., Taylor, R.: A conjecture on the existence of compact leaves of algebraic foliations. http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~nisb/

  10. Fulton, W.: Intersection Theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A, vol. 2, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gromov, M.: Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces. Modern Birkhäuser Classics. Birkhäuser, Boston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kleiner, B.: Hyperbolicity using minimal surfaces (preprint)

  13. Martinet, J.: Normalisation des champs de vecteurs holomorphes (d’après A.-D. Brjuno). In: Bourbaki Seminar, Vol. 1980/81. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 901, pp. 55–70. Springer, Berlin (1981)

  14. McQuillan, M.: Diophantine approximations and foliations. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 87, 121–174 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. McQuillan, M.: Formal formal schemes. In: Berrick, A.J., Leung, M.C., Xu, X. (eds.) Topology and Geometry: Commemorating SISTAG. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 314, pp. 187–198. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. McQuillan, M.: Semi-stable reduction of foliations. IHES/M/05/02 (2005). preprints.ihes.fr/2005/M/ M-05-02.pdf

  17. McQuillan, M.: Canonical models of foliations. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 4(3), 877–1012 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. McQuillan, M.: Two Ext groups and a resdiue (2012). arXiv:1207.1155

  19. McQuillan, M.: Baby geography and Mordellicity of surfaces. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26(1), 337–357 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. McQuillan, M., Panazzolo, D.: Almost étale resolution of foliations. J. Differential Geom. 95(2), 279–319 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyaoka, Y.: The orbibundle Miyaoka–Yau–Sakai inequality and an effective Bogomolov–McQuillan theorem. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 44(2), 403–417 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Shepherd-Barron, N.I.: Miyaoka’s theorems on the generic seminegativity of \(T_X\) and on the Kodaira dimension of minimal regular threefolds. In: Kollár, J. (ed.) Flips and Abundance for Algebraic Threefolds. Astérisque, vol. 211, pp. 103–114. Société Mathématique de France, Paris (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shepherd-Barron, N.I.: Infinite generation for rings of symmetric tensors. Math. Res. Lett. 2(2), 125–128 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tian, G., Yau, S.-T.: Existence of Kähler–Einstein metrics on complete Kähler manifolds and their applications to algebraic geometry. In: Yau, S.T. (ed.) Mathematical Aspects of String Theory. Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, vol. 1, pp. 574–628. World Scientific, Singapore (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael McQuillan.

Additional information

In memoriam Torsten Ekedahl

With support of the project “Consolidate the foundations” of the Università di Tor Vergata.

Appendix: Baum–Bott theory with values in the ground field

Appendix: Baum–Bott theory with values in the ground field

Let X / S be an algebraic, resp. complex, Deligne–Mumford champ over an algebraic, resp. complex, space. The Deligne–Mumford condition ensures that \({\Omega }^1_{X/S}\) is well defined, and whence for every \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) there is, on identifying \(\mathrm {H}^1\) with Čech co-cycles, an Atiyah class,

(101)

whose symmetric functions define for each \(q\in \mathbb {N}\) Chern-classes of “Hodge type”, i.e.

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathrm {c}}_q:\mathrm {H}^1(X, {\mathrm {GL}}_n)\rightarrow \mathrm {H}^q(X, {\Omega }^q_{X/S}). \end{aligned}$$
(102)

As such the Atiyah class of a vector bundle, E, vanishes iff there is a connection

and such vanishing implies, a fortiori, vanishing of the Chern classes of (102). Naturally, therefore, the Atiyah class is usually viewed as an obstruction, and, rather obviously, if one only asks that E admits a connection along certain directions then this obstruction is smaller, i.e. for any derivation with values in an -module

Fact A.1

The obstruction that a vector bundle E admits a connection along D, i.e. a map

satisfying the Leibniz rule, , lies in

(103)

Proof

By definition, D corresponds to a map , so that the obstruction (103) is just the restriction of the Atiyah class (101). \(\square \)

A generally valid example of such a bundle would be

Example A.2

If C is a family of invariant effective Cartier divisor, then by definition

so we get (rather tautological) connections for , and \({\mathscr {O}}_X(C)\).

Consequently, irrespective of any integrability about the field of directions afforded by D

Corollary A.3

If \(f:Y\rightarrow X\) is a map such that we have a factorisation

$$\begin{aligned} f^*{\Omega }^1_{X/S} \rightarrow f^*{\mathscr {M}}\rightarrow {\Omega }^1_{Y/S} \end{aligned}$$

then for any bundle E admitting a connection along D the Hodge Chern classes

vanish.

Now the key point is that in the presence of integrability there is at least one rather interesting bundle admitting a connection along the leaves, i.e.

Fact A.4

Suppose the sheaf of derivations, \(T_{\mathscr {F}}\), vanishing along the kernel, \({\Omega }^1_{X/{\mathscr {F}}}\), of \({\Omega }^1_{X/S}\rightarrow {\mathscr {M}}\) is closed under bracket and \(U\hookrightarrow X\) is the locus where \({\Omega }^1_{X/{\mathscr {F}}}\hookrightarrow {\Omega }^1_{X/S}\) defines a sub-bundle of \({\Omega }^1_{X/S}\), then \({\Omega }^1_{X/{\mathscr {F}}}|_U\) admits a connection along \({\Omega }^1_{X/S}|_ U \rightarrow {\Omega }^1_{\mathscr {F}}:=\mathrm {Hom}_{{\mathscr {O}}_X}(T_{\mathscr {F}}, {\mathscr {O}}_X)\).

Proof

Differentiation affords a map

(104)

so by hypothesis the former map in (104) factors through the kernel of the latter, which over the locus, U, is naturally the image of

and the quotient of this by the sub-image of is, over, U: . \(\square \)

Typically one applies this in the form

Corollary A.5

Suppose \({\Omega }^1_{X/{\mathscr {F}}}, {\Omega }^1_{\mathscr {F}}\) are bundles; U is of co-dimension 2; and X is \(S_2\) then \({\Omega }^1_{X/{\mathscr {F}}}\) admits a connection,

(105)

Nevertheless,

Warning A.6

It does not follow from A.3 and A.5 that for \(f:Y\rightarrow X\) factoring through a \({\mathscr {F}}\) invariant sub-variety that the Atiyah class, or even the Chern classes, whether of \(f^* {\Omega }^1_{X/{\mathscr {F}}}\), or of A.2, vanishes. Indeed this only follows if (105) factors, around f, through

otherwise there is a residue/obstruction in

The resulting residues admit, [2] or [17, 1.3] for a characteristic free version, various formulae, of which the most relevant is:

Example A.7

Let \((X,{\mathscr {F}})\) be a foliated smooth surface with log-canonical singular locus Z over a field k for which every singularity is a reduced k-point and E an invariant simple normal crossing divisor such that at any singularity there are two branches of E then \({\Omega }^1_{X/F}(E)\) admits a connection without residues, i.e.

(106)

In particular, for p the characteristic of k and \(f:{\Sigma }\rightarrow X\) any invariant curve

(107)

Proof

The in particular follows from the general residue formula [17, 1.3.1] of which (106) is a minor variation. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McQuillan, M. Curves on surfaces of mixed characteristic. European Journal of Mathematics 3, 433–470 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40879-017-0141-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40879-017-0141-9

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation