Skip to main content
Log in

Bipolar Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multi-attribute Decision Making Problems

  • Published:
Annals of Data Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the idea of the bipolar Pythagorean fuzzy sets (BPFSs) and its activities, which is a generalization of fuzzy sets, bipolar fuzzy sets (BFSs), intuitionistic fuzzy sets and bipolar intuitionistic fuzzy sets is proposed, with the goal that it can deal with dubious data all the more flexibly during the process of decision making. The key objective of this research paper has presented another variant of the Pythagorean fuzzy sets so called BPFSs. In bipolar Pythagorean fuzzy sets, membership degrees are satisfying the condition \(0 \le \left( {\mu_{p}^{ + } \left( x \right)} \right)^{2}\) + \(\left( {v_{p}^{ + } \left( x \right)} \right)^{2} \le 1\) and \(0 \le \left( {\mu_{p}^{ - } \left( x \right)} \right)^{2}\) + \(\left( {v_{p}^{ - } \left( x \right)} \right)^{2} \le 1\) instead of \(0 \le \left( {\mu_{p} \left( x \right)} \right)^{2}\) + \(\left( {v_{p} \left( x \right)} \right)^{2} \le 1\) as is in Pythagorean fuzzy sets and \(0 \le \mu_{p} \left( x \right)\) + \(v_{p} \left( x \right) \le 1\) as is in the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Here, negative membership degree means the certain counter-property comparing to a bipolar Pythagorean fuzzy set. Also, the BPFSs weighted average operator and the BPFSs weighted geometric operator to aggregate the BPFSs is developed here. Further a multi attribute decision making technique is developed and the proposed aggregation operators are used. Finally, a numerical methodology for execution of the proposed system is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov, (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen SJ, Chen SM (2003) A new method for handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems using FN-IOWA operators. Cybern Syst 34:109–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong DH, Choi CH (2000) Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bustine H, Burillo P (1996) Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:403–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Atanassov K, Gargov G (1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31(343):349

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yager RR, Kacprzyk J (1997) On ordered weighted averaging operator: theory and application. Kluwer, Norwell

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yager RR, Filev DP (1999) Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 29:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yager RR (2002) The induced fuzzy integral aggregation operator. Int J Intell Syst 17:1049–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yager RR (2003) Induced aggregation operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 137:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu ZS, Chen J (2007) On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. In: Fourth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, vol 2. pp 466–471

  15. Chen SM, Tan JM (1994) Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 67:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Alonso S (2004) Induced ordered weighted geometric operators and their use in the aggregation of multiplicative preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 19:233–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. Eur Jo Oper Res 182:383–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Herrera-Viedma E, Pasi G, Lopez-Herrera A, Porcel C (2006) Evaluating the information quality of web sites—a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57:538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35:417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu ZS (2006a) Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making. Inf Fusion 7:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan CQ, Chen XH (2010) Induced choquet ordered averaging operator and its application to group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 25:59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu ZS (2006b) An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Decis Support Syst 41:488–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2008) Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Int J Approx Reason 48:246–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei GW (2010) Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 10:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao H, Xu ZS, Ni MF, Liu SS (2010) Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu ZS (2007a) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:1179–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu ZS (2007b) Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control Deci 22:215–219 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peng X, Yang Y (2015) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31:1–44

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garai T, Chakraborty D, Roy TK (2019) Multi-objective inventory model with both stock-dependent demand rate and holding cost rate under fuzzy random environment. Ann Data Sci 6:61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang P (2015a) Oriental thinking and fuzzy logic (2015 celebration of the 50th anniversary of fuzzy sets). Ann Data Sci 2:243–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bera AK, Jana DK, Banerjee D et al (2020) A two-phase multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making approach for supplier evaluation and order allocation considering multi-objective, multi-product and multi-period. Ann Data Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-020-00255-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi YM (2001) Multiple criteria multiple constraint-level linear programming: concepts, techniques and applications. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu Z, Shi Y (2015) Exploring big data analysis: fundamental scientific problems. Ann Data Sci 2:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shi Y, Tian YJ, Kou G, Peng Y, Li JP (2011) Optimization based data mining: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Shi Winter Y (2014) Big data: history, current status, and challenges going forward. Bridge US Natl Acad Eng 44(4):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  36. Olson D, Shi Y (2007) Introduction to business data mining. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lakovic V (2020) Crisis management of android botnet detection using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Ann Data Sci 7:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang P (2015b) Oriental Thinking and Fuzzy Logic, Celebration of the 50th Anniversary of Fuzzy Sets. Ann Data Sci 2:243–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang WR, Zhang JH, Shi Y, Chen SS (2009) Bipolar linear algebra and YinYang-N-element cellular networks for equilibrium-based bio-system simulation and regulation. J Biol Syst 17(4):547–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee KM (2000) Bipolar-valued fuzzy sets and their operations. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent technologies Bangkok Thailand. pp 307–312

  41. Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29:1061–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hang XL, Xu ZS (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29:1061–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ezhilmaran D, Sankar K (2015) Morphism of bipolar intuitionistic fuzzy graphs. J Discrete Math Sci Cryptogr 18:605–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang Y, Ding H, Chen ZS, Li YL (2015) A note on extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 31:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen J, Li S, Ma S, Wang X (2014) m-Polar fuzzy sets: an extension of bipolar fuzzy sets. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/416530

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wasim Akram Mandal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandal, W.A. Bipolar Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multi-attribute Decision Making Problems. Ann. Data. Sci. 10, 555–587 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-020-00315-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-020-00315-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation