Skip to main content
Log in

And We Are the Easiest to Fool: A Review of Franz de Waal’s Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are?

  • Book Review
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Birch, H. G. (1945). The relation of prior experience to insightful problem solving. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 38, 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blough, D. S. (1957). Spectral sensitivity in the pigeon. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 47, 827–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, M. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1995). Animal mind and the argument from design. American Psychologist, 50(3), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boakes, R. (1984). From Darwin to behaviorism: Psychology and the minds of animals. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2014). The evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science, 346(6207), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candland, D. K. (1993). Feral children and clever animals: Reflections on human nature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. (2012, September 6). Harvard psychology researcher committed fraud, U.S. investigation concludes. Science, Retrieved from: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/09/harvard-psychology-researcher-committed-fraud-us-investigation-concludes

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (2016). Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. (1987). The spontaneous interconnection of four repertoires of behavior in a pigeon. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. (1974, June). Cargo cult science. Engineering & Science, 10–13.

  • Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattal, K. A., St. Peter Pipkin, C., & Escobar, R. (2013). Operant extinction: Elimination and generation of behavior. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 2: Translating principles into practice (pp. 77–107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. R., & Stuttard, S. (1979). Dr. Guthrie and Felis domesticus or: Tripping over the cat. Science, 205, 1031–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. L. (1894). An introduction to comparative psychology. London, UK: Scott.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. L. (1903). An introduction to comparative psychology (2 nd ed., rev.). London, UK: Scott.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pear, J. (2004). The science of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfungst, O. (1911). Clever Hans (the horse of Mr. von Osten): A contribution to experimental animal and human psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poling, A., Nickel, M., & Alling, K. (1990). Free birds aren’t fat. Weight gain in captured wild pigeons maintained under laboratory conditions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53(3), 423–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, G. (1886). Animal intelligence. New York, NY: Appleton (Original work published 1882).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, C. (1987). The burden of skepticism. Skeptical Inquirer, 12(1), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. G., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in the scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. K. R., & Contie, C. L. (1994). Further reflections on mirror usage by pigeons: Lessons from Winnie-the-Pooh and Pinocchio too. In S. T. Parker, R. W. Mitchell, & M. L. Boccia (Eds.), Self-awareness in animals and humans (pp. 392–409). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 2(4), i–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, W. (1997). An animal-centered, causal-systems approach to the understanding and control of behavior. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 53, 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinklepaugh, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 8, 197–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Case histories in the great power of steady misrepresentation. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1441–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchino, E., & Watanabe, S. (2014). Self-recognition in pigeons revisited. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102, 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, L. (2008). The power of critical thinking (second ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Washburn, M. F. (1908). The animal mind. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, C. D. L. (2004). The perils of anthropomorphism. Nature, 428, 606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments of Stephanie da Silva on an earlier version of this article as well as the comments from the anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brady J. Phelps.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The sole author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

No animals were involved in the preparation of this manuscript.

No human participants were involved in the preparation of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phelps, B.J. And We Are the Easiest to Fool: A Review of Franz de Waal’s Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are?. Psychol Rec 68, 561–566 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0301-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0301-4

Navigation