Skip to main content
Log in

A Brief Evaluation of a Pictorially Enhanced Self-Instruction Packet on Participant Fidelity across Multiple ABA Procedures

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhanced self-instructions have been previously shown to lead to high levels of training protocol fidelity by lower level staff applying applied behavior analysis (ABA) protocols. An A-B replication series design across participants was used to gather preliminary evidence on the breadth of benefit of this approach to staff training, considered across common training tasks. Participants (N = 14) with no previous background in ABA learned how to conduct either two preference assessments (paired stimulus and multiple stimulus without replacement) or two acquisition discrete trial programs (match to sample and motor imitation) under two different self-instruction conditions. Procedures were trained using textual information only (i.e., standard packet) or textual information enhanced with visual cues (i.e., enhanced packet). Eight of the participants received a standard packet followed by an enhanced packet; six received them in reverse order. Each sequence was replicated within participants across the two tasks. No follow-up feedback or training was provided during either condition so as not to contaminate assessment of the effects of these self-instructions on procedural fidelity. Results showed that participants achieved near-mastery levels of performance under the enhanced packet condition. Seven of the eight participants who received the standard packet first improved in fidelity after receiving the enhanced packet. Where there was some evidence of maintenance of gains in some participants of new tasks trained again with the standard packet, reintroduction of the enhanced packet led to high fidelity in all cases. It appears that previous experimental findings showing the benefit of enhanced self-instructional training on the procedural fidelity of lower level training staff apply across a wide range of common ABA tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cooper, J. O., Heward, W. L., & Heron, T. E. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dibs, N., & Sturmey, P. (2007). Reducing student stereotypy by improving teachers’ implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 339–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Graff, B. R., & Karsten, A. M. (2012). Evaluation of a self-instruction package for conducting stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(1), 69–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Higbee, T. S., Aporta, A. P., Resnede, A., Nogueria, M., Goyos, C., & Pollard, J. S. (2016). Interactive computer training to teach discrete-trial instruction to undergraduates and special educators in Brazil: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(4), 780–793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, S. A., & Hewitt, A. S. (Eds.). (2005). Staff recruitment, retention and training strategies for community human services organizations. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, L. A., Gravina, N., & Carr, J. E. (2009). Training issues unique to autism spectrum disorders. In J. Matson (Ed.), Applied behavior analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders (pp. 225–235). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Macurik, K. M., O’Kane, N. P., Malanga, P., & Reid, D. H. (2008). Video training of support staff in intervention plans for challenging behavior: Comparison with live training. Behavioral Interventions, 23, 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigro-Bruzzi, D., & Sturmey, P. (2010). The effects of behavioral skills training on mand training by staff and unprompted vocal mands by children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 757–761.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nosik, M. R., & Williams, W. L. (2011). Component evaluation of a computer based format for teaching discrete trial and backward chaining. Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32, 1694–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. S., Higbee, T. S., Akers, J. S., & Brodhead, M. T. (2014). An evaluation of interactive computer training to teach instructors to implement discrete trials with children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(4), 765–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, E. M., Fisher, W. W., Glover, A. C., & Volkert, V. M. (2006). Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 63–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Salem, S., Fazzio, D., Arnal, L., Fregeau, P., Thomson, K., Martin, G. L., & Yu, C. T. (2009). A self-instructional package for teaching university students to conduct discrete-trials teaching with children with autism. Journal on Intellectual Disabilities, 15(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarokoff, R. A., & Sturmey, P. (2004). The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 535–538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sarokoff, R. A., & Sturmey, P. (2008). The effects of instructions, rehearsal, modeling, and feedback on acquisition and generalization of staff use of discrete trial teaching and student correct response. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, C., Fazzio, D., Arnal, L., Martin, G. L., & Keilback, L. (2009). Evaluating a self-instructional strategy plus monetary contingency to train instructors to conduct discrete-trials teaching with children with autism. Behaviour Modification, 33, 360–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, K. M., Martin, G. L., Fazzio, D., Salem, S., Young, K., & Yu, C. T. (2012). Evaluation of a self-instructional package for teaching tutors to conduct discrete trials teaching with children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1073–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vladescu, J. C., Caroll, R., Paden, A., & Kodak, T. M. (2012). The effects of video modeling with voiceover instruction on accurate implementation of discrete-trial instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(2), 419–423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Steven C. Hayes for his insightful analysis and contribution to the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

Thouraya Al-Nasser has not received any research grants from any company or organization to sponsor this study. W. Larry Williams has not received any research grants from any company or organization to sponsor this study. Brian Feeney has not received any research grants from any company or organization to sponsor this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thouraya Al-Nasser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Thouraya Al-Nasser declares that she has no conflict of interest. W. Larry Williams declares that he has no conflict of interest. Brian Feeney declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Nasser, T., Larry Williams, W. & Feeney, B. A Brief Evaluation of a Pictorially Enhanced Self-Instruction Packet on Participant Fidelity across Multiple ABA Procedures. Behav Analysis Practice 12, 387–395 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00282-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00282-w

Keywords

Navigation