Abstract
Elopement is a dangerous behavior that is emitted by a large proportion of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Functional analysis and function-based treatments are critical in identifying maintaining reinforcers and decreasing elopement. The purpose of this review was to identify recent trends in the functional analysis and treatment of elopement, as well as determine the efficacy (standardized mean differences) of recent treatments. Over half of subjects’ elopement was maintained by social positive reinforcement, while only 25% of subjects’ elopement was maintained by social negative reinforcement. Elopement was rarely maintained by automatic reinforcement, and none of the studies in the current review evaluated treatments to address automatically maintained elopement. Functional communication training was the most common intervention regardless of function. Results are discussed in terms of clinical implications and directions for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Anderson, C., Law, J. K., Daniels, A., Rice, C., Mandell, D. S., Hagopian, L., & Law, P. (2012). Occurrence and family impact of elopement in children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 130, 870–877. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0762.
Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 161–169. doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7.
Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., & Ault, M. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191. doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-175.
Boyle, M., Samaha, A. L., Rodewald, A., & Hoffmann, A. N. (2013). Evaluation of the reliability and validity of GraphClick as a data extraction program. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1023–1027. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.031.
Boyle, M. A., Samaha, A. L., Slocum, T. A., Hoffmann, A. N., & Bloom, S. E. (2016). A human-operant investigation of preceding- and following-schedule behavioral contrast. The Psychological Record, 66, 381–394. doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0179-y.
Call, N. A., Pabico, R. S., Findley, A. J., & Valentino, A. L. (2011). Differential reinforcement with and without blocking as treatment for elopement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 903–907. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-903.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Cooper, L. J., Wacker, D. P., Sasso, G. M., Reimers, T. M., & Donn, L. K. (1990). Using parents as therapists to evaluate appropriate behavior of their children: application to a tertiary diagnostic clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 285–296. doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-285.
Davis, T. N., Durand, S., Bankhead, J., Strickland, E., Blenden, K., Dacus, S., et al. (2013). Brief report: latency functional analysis of elopement. Behavioral Interventions, 28, 251–259. doi:10.1002/bin.1363.
Falcomata, T. S., Roane, H. S., Feeney, B. J., & Stephenson, K. M. (2010). Assessment and treatment of elopement maintained by access to stereotypy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 513–517. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-513.
Gibson, J. L., Pennington, R. C., Stenhoff, D. M., & Hopper, J. S. (2010). Using desktop videoconferencing to deliver interventions to a preschool student with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(4), 214–225. doi:10.1177/0271121409352873.
Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., & Dickinson, S. L. (2015). Effect size for single-subject design in phonological treatment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 1468–1481. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0299.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147.
Iwata, B., & DeLeon, I. (2005). The functional analysis screening tool. Gainesville, FL: The Florida Center on Self-Injury, University of Florida.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2 , 3-20, 1982). doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.
Iwata, B. A., & Dozier, C. L. (2008). Clinical application of functional analysis methodology. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(1), 3–9 Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1182/.
Kiely, B., Migdal, T. R., Vettam, S., & Adesman, A. (2016). Prevalence and correlates of elopement in a nationally representative sample of children with developmental disabilities in the United States. PloS One, 11(2), e0148337. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148337.
Kodak, T., Grow, L., & Northup, J. (2004). Functional analysis and treatment of elopement for a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 229–232. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-229.
Lang, R., Davis, T., O’Rielly, M., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Sigafoos, J., et al. (2010). Functional analysis and treatment of elopement across two school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 113–118. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-113.
Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Machalicek, W., Lancioni, G., Rispoli, M., & Chan, J. M. (2008). A preliminary comparison of functional analysis results when conducted in contrived versus natural settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 441–445. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-441.
Lang, R., Rispoli, M., Machalicek, W., White, P. J., Kang, S., Pierce, N., et al. (2009). Treatment of elopement in individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 670–681. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.11.003.
Lehardy, R. K., Lerman, D. C., Evans, L. M., O’Connor, A., & LeSage, D. L. (2013). A simplified methodology for identifying the function of elopement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 256–270. doi:10.1002/jaba.22.
Neidert, P. L., Iwata, B. A., Dempsey, C. M., & Thomason-Sassi, J. L. (2013). Latency of response during the functional analysis of elopement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 312–316. doi:10.1002/jaba.11.
Northup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., & DeRaad, A. (1991). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509–522. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-509.
Olive, M. L., & Franco, J. H. (2008). (Effect) size matters: and so does the calculation. The Behavior Analyst Today, 9(1), 5–10 Retrieved from: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bar/9/1/5.pdf.
Olive, M. L., & Smith, B. W. (2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25(2–3), 313–324. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301238.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: a review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147.
Perrin, C. J., Perrin, S. H., Hill, E. A., & DiNovi, K. (2008). Brief functional analysis and treatment of elopement in preschoolers with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 23, 87–95. doi:10.1002/bin.256.
Piazza, C. C., Hanley, G. P., Bowman, L. G., Ruyter, J. M., Lindauer, S. E., & Saiontz, D. M. (1997). Functional analysis and treatment of elopement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 653–672. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-653.
Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single-subject experimental research: description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42, 11–33. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12091.
Rapp, J. T. (2008). Conjugate reinforcement: a brief review and suggestions for applications to the assessment of automatically reinforced behavior. Behavioral Interventions, 23, 113–136. doi:10.1002/bin.259.
Rapp, J. T., & Vollmer, T. R. (2005). Stereotypy I: a review of behavioral assessment and treatment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 527–547. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.005.
Stevenson, M. T., Ghezzi, P. M., & Valenton, K. G. (2015). FCT and delay fading for elopement with a child with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(2), 169–173. doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0089-5.
Tarbox, R. S. F., Wallace, M. D., & Williams, L. (2003). Assessment and treatment of elopement: a replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 239–244. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-239.
Thomason-Sassi, J. L., Iwata, B. A., Neidert, P. L., & Roscoe, E. M. (2011). Response latency as an index of response strength during functional analyses of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 51–67. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-51.
Touchette, P. E., MacDonald, R. F., & Langer, S. N. (1985). A scatterplot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 343–351. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-343.
Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Wright, C. S., Van Camp, C., & Lalli, J. S. (2001). Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 269–287. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-269.
Wolery, M., Busick, M., Reichow, B., & Barton, E. E. (2010). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data. The Journal of Special Education, 44, 18–28 Retrieved from: http://journals.sagepub.com/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Both authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Studies with Human Participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(DOCX 111 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyle, M.A., Adamson, R.M. Systematic Review of Functional Analysis and Treatment of Elopement (2000–2015). Behav Analysis Practice 10, 375–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0191-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0191-y