Abstract
Instructive feedback (IF) is a procedure in which extra information is presented to a participant during the consequence portion of instruction for other skills. Previous research has demonstrated that participants with intellectual disabilities may acquire a portion of non-targeted skills (secondary targets) without explicit instruction when extra information is presented. Previous research has demonstrated that IF has resulted in more efficient instruction for participants with disabilities as a whole. However, few studies have focused on participants with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Additionally, the measures of secondary target acquisition in past research have focused solely on discrete responses (e.g., one-word utterances). The current investigation extended the IF literature related to participants with ASD by including longer verbal responses as secondary targets and assessing maintenance for both primary and secondary targets. Across three participants, IF resulted in the acquisition of at least a portion of secondary targets without explicit teaching. For two participants, additional instruction was required before IF resulted in acquisition of secondary targets. Across all three participants, gains observed for both primary and secondary targets in intervention were maintained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carroll, R. A., & Kodak, T. (2015). Using instructive feedback to increase response variability during intraverbal training for children with autism spectrum disorder. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 183–199. doi:10.1007/s40616-015-0039x.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Kelso, S. E. (2003). Teaching children with autism conversational speech using a cue card/written script program. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 108–127.
Cipani, E. (2012). Stimulus overselectivity: empirical basis and diagnostic methods. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13, 3–11. doi:10.1037/h0100712.
Delmolino, L., Hansford, A. P., Bamond, M. J., Fiske, K. E., & LaRue, R. H. (2013). The use of instructive feedback for teaching language skills to children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 648–661. doi:10.1016/j.rasd/2013.02.015.
Dotto-Fojut, K. M., Reeve, K. F., Townsend, D. B., & Progar, P. R. (2011). Teaching adolescents with autism to describe a problem and request assistance during simulated vocational trials. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 826–833. doi:10.1016/j.rasd/2010.09.012.
Esch, J. W., Esch, B. E., McCart, J. D., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2010). An assessment of self-echoic behavior in young children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 3–13.
Falkenstine, K. J., Collins, B. C., Schuster, J. W., & Kleinert, H. (2009). Presenting chained and discrete tasks as non-targeted information when teaching discrete academic skills through small group instruction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 127–142.
Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Routledge: New York.
Gutierrez, R. D. (2006). The role of rehearsal in joint control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 183–190.
Hagman, J. D., & Rose, A. M. (1983). Retention of military tasks. Human Factors, 25, 199–213. doi:10.1177/001872088302500207.
Loughrey, T. O., Betz, A. M., Majdalany, L. M., & Nicholson, K. (2014). Using instructive feedback to teach category names to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 425–430. doi:10.1002/jaba.123.
Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.
Nottingham, C. L., Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2015). Incorporating additional targets into learning trials for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 227–232. doi:10.1002/jaba.179.
Parsons, J. A. (1976). Conditioning precurrent (problem solving) behavior of children. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2, 190–206.
Reichow, B., & Wolery, M. (2011). Comparison of progressive prompt delay with and without instructive feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 327–340. doi:10.190/jaba.2011.44-327.
Schlinger, H. D. (2008). Listening is behaving verbally. The Behavior Analyst, 31, 145–161.
Sigafoos, J., Roberts, D., Kerr, M., Couzens, D., & Baglioni, A. J. (1994). Opportunities for communication in classrooms serving children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 259–279. doi:10.1007/BF02172226.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1984). An operant analysis of problem solving. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 583–613. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00027412.
Stone, W. L., & Caro-Martinez, L. M. (1990). Naturalistic observations of spontaneous communication in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 437–453. doi:10.1007/BF02216051.
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP: verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: a language and social skills assessment program for children with autism or other developmental disabilities: guide. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2013). Increasing instructional efficiency by presenting additional stimuli in learning trials for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 805–816. doi:10.1002/jaba.70.
Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Gast, D. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55–75. doi:10.1007/BF02110214.
Whalen, C., Schuster, J. W., & Hemmeter, M. L. (1996). The use of unrelated instructive feedback when teaching in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 188–202.
Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., & Holcombe, A. (1993). Reflections on “effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behaviors”. Exceptionality, 4, 117–123. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex0402_2.
Wolery, T. D., Schuster, J. W., & Collins, B. C. (2000). Effects on future learning of presenting non-target stimuli in antecedent and consequent conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 77–94. doi:10.1023/A:1016679928480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no declared financial conflicts of interest.
Ethics Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained for all individuals in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tullis, C.A., Frampton, S.E., Delfs, C.H. et al. Teaching Problem Explanations Using Instructive Feedback. Analysis Verbal Behav 33, 64–79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0075-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0075-1