Skip to main content
Log in

Using Textual Prompts to Teach Mands for Information Using “Who?”

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research on teaching mands for information to children with language deficits has focused on manipulating establishing operations (EOs). However, only a few of those studies have programmed both EO conditions (in which information is needed) and abolishing operation (AO) conditions (in which information has already been provided) to ensure functional use of the mand for information. Shillingsburg, Bowen, Valentino, and Pierce (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 136–150, 2014) provided a successful demonstration of differential responding between EO and AO conditions demonstrating control of the response by the relevant EO. Echoic prompts resulted in successful mands for information “Who?” One limitation of this study was that the participants did not re-issue the initial mand upon approaching the named adult to retrieve the item. This may be problematic in the natural environment as it is unlikely that the named adult would know what the child was looking for. The current study sought to replicate and expand previous research by using textual prompts to teach the mand “Who?” in four children diagnosed with autism (Phase 1) and by requiring the mand for the item be re-issued upon approaching the named adult (Phase 2). Textual prompts resulted in differential use of the mand for information during EO and AO conditions for all of the participants. Additionally, three of the four participants who did not re-issue the mand to the named adult during the Phase 2 baseline did so following the intervention. Overall, results support the use of textual prompts to teach mands for information to children with autism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, R. (1968). The development of wh questions in child speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 279–290. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80002–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, K., & Higbee, T. (2007). Contriving motivating operations to evoke mands for information in preschoolers with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2010). Acquisition of intraverbal behavior: teaching children with autism to mand for answers to questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 1–17. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lechago, S. A., Carr, J. E., Grow, L. L., Love, J. R., & Almason, S. M. (2010). Mands for information generalize across establishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 381–395. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lechago, S. A., Howell, A., Caccavale, M. N., & Peterson, C. W. (2013). Teaching “how?” mand‐for‐information frames to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 781–791. doi:10.1002/jaba.71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. W., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Guiltinan, S. (1988). The effectiveness of a constant time-delay procedure to teach chained responses to adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 169–178. doi:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-169.

  • Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., Valentino, A. L., & Pierce, L. E. (2014). Mands for information using “who?” and “which?” in the presence of establishing and abolishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 136–150. doi:10.1002/jaba.101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., & Valentino, A. L. (2014). Mands for information using “how” under EO-absent and EO-present conditions. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 54–61. doi:10.1007/s40616-013-0002-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shillingsburg, M. A., Valentino, A. L., Bowen, C. N., Bradley, D., & Zavatkay, D. (2011). Teaching children with autism to request information. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 670–679. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education & Treatment of Children, 8(1), 67–76.

  • Sundberg, M. L., Loeb, M., Hale, L., & Eigenheer, P. (2002). Contriving establishing operations to teach mands for information. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 15–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vedora, J., Meunier, L., & Mackay, H. (2009). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism: a comparison of textual and echoic prompts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Brittany Bartlett, Sunita Joshi, Danielle Richardson, Bethany Hansen, Kelly Schleismann, and Sarah Wymer for their assistance with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Alice Shillingsburg.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shillingsburg, M.A., Gayman, C.M. & Walton, W. Using Textual Prompts to Teach Mands for Information Using “Who?”. Analysis Verbal Behav 32, 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0053-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0053-7

Keywords

Navigation