Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Smallholder Livestock Keepers’ Breeding Choices and Its Implication on Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from Tanzania

  • Published:
Global Social Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The livestock sector in developing countries is characterized by poverty and outdated methods of rearing animals; thus, any initiatives to reverse the situation must focus on improving the breeding types of animals and making the process affordable across the entire livestock keeping societies. Therefore, this study examines determinants of smallholder livestock keepers’ breeding choices and their implications on poverty reduction in Tanzania. It employed multinomial logit and probit models to examine breeding choices and their effects on poverty reduction, respectively. Findings showed that the sector is male dominated and largely conducted in rural areas, of which breeding choices are dominated by traditional breeds (56.34%), while improved beef and dairy breeds formed 40.51% and 3.06% of entire livestock, respectively. Moreover, the multinomial logit model results showed that residence, zone, education, and per capita income are significant determinants of livestock breeding choices among smallholder livestock keepers. Probit model results showed that improved beef and dairy breeds significantly reduce poverty compared to traditional breeds. The study recommends developing countries to have clear strategies of improving animal breeds by introducing local breeding improvement programs in all public ranching sites. This should go hand in hand with the improvement of local veterinary centers to reduce animal fatalities and enabling livestock keepers to access medics at lower or subsided costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Data and all materials will be available upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Codes and all materials will be available upon request.

References

  • Bayan, B., & Dutta, M. (2017). Crossbred cattle adoption and its impact on income and household milk consumption among dairy farmers: Empirical evidence from Assam. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics., 72(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.302255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croce, M. (2016). Farming is an industry dominated by men. Retrieved 22 Jul 2022, from https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/farming-industry-dominated-men-weve-7753080

  • Engida, E., Guthiga, P., & Karugia, J. (2015). The role of livestock in the Tanzanian economy: Policy analysis using a dynamic computable general equilibrium model for Tanzania. Research in agricultural and applied economics. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/212039

  • FAO. (2016). The state of food and Agriculture. Retrieved January 4, 2022, from https://www.fao.org/3/i6030e/i6030e.pdf

  • Galie, A., Teufel, N., Korir, L., Baltenweck, I., Webb Girard, A., Dominguez-Salas, P., & Yount, K. M. (2019). The women’s empowerment in livestock index. Social Indicators Research, 142, 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1934-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, D., Lindahl, J., Wanyoike, F., Bett, B., Randolph, T., & Rich, K. M. (2017). Poor livestock keepers: Ecosystem –poverty – health interactions. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. B, 372, 20160166. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2010). Modelling ordered choice: A primer. Cambridge University Press.

  • Greene, W. H. (2012). NLOGIT version 5 user guide. Econometrics Software, Plain View, New York, USA.

  • Gujarati D. N., & Porter D. C. (2009). Basic econometric. (5th Edition). Tata McGraw –Hill, New Delhi, India.

  • IFAD. (2016). Livestock and pastoralists. Rome, Italy: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

  • Jolliffe, D. & Prydz, E. B. (2016). Estimating International poverty lines from comparable national thresholds. World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper 7606.

  • Kearney, L., & White, J. (2016). Animal breeding benefits farmers offer food secure opportunity for mitigating climate change. Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security. Retrieved December 26, 2021, from https://ccafs.cgiar.org/news/animal-breeding-benefits-farmers-offers-food-secure-opportunity-mitigating-climate-change

  • Kitole, F. A., Lihawa, R. M. & Nsindagi, T. E. (2022). Agriculture productivity and farmers’ health in Tanzania: Analysis on maize subsector. Glob Soc Welf (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-022-00243-w

  • Konga, D. (2014). Transformation of smallholders’ livestock keeping into commercial livestock keeping in Rukwa southwestern Tanzania. Master’s thesis. The Open University of Tanzania. Retrieved March 2,  2022, from http://repository.out.ac.tz/id/eprint/632

  • Maddala, G. S., & Lahiri, K. (1992). Introduction to econometrics (Vol. 2). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K., Gibson, J. P., Mwai, O., Mwacharo, J. M., Haile, A., Getachew, T., Mrode, R., & Kemp, S. J. (2019). Livestock genomics for developing countries – African examples in practice. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Collado, D., Byrne, T. J., Diaz, C., & Amer, P. R. (2018). The complexity of animal breeding choice making. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 00, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mausch, K., Harris, D., Heather, E., Jones, E., Yim, J., & Hauser, M. (2018). Household aspirations for rural development through agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture, 47, 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, S., Mbwambo, N., Mruttu, H., Dotto, M., Ndomba, C., da Silva, M., Makusaro, F., Nandonde, S., Crispin, J., & Shapiro, B (2018). Tanzania livestock sector analysis (2016/2017–2031/2032). Nairobi, Kenya. ILRI. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/100527

  • Moser, P. (2008). Livelihood transitions in upland Lao PDR in the light of changing policies. Can traditional rural institutions be maintained? Diploma thesis, Universität Wien.

  • Mujibi, F. D. N., Rao, J., Agaba, M., Nyambo, D., Cheruiyot, E. K., Kihara, A., Zhang, Y. I., & Mrode, R. (2019). Performance evaluation of highly admixed Tanzanian smallholder dairy cattle using SNP derived kinship matrix. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murage, A. W., & Ilatsia, E. D. (2011). Factors that determine the use of breeding services by smallholder dairy farmers in Central Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43, 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutenje, M. U., Chipfupa, W., Mupangwa, I., Nyagumbo, G., Manyawu, I., & Chakoma, L. G. (2020). Understanding breeding preferences among small-scale cattle producers: Implications for livestock improvement programmes, Animal, 14(8). ISSN, 1757–1767, 1751–7311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2022). Tanzania household budget survey (HBS) 2017–2018, Public Use File. Ref. TZA_2018_HBS_v01_M. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from https://www.nbs.go.tz/tnada/index.php/catalog/30

  • SADC. (2020). Livestock production in Southern Afrian Development Community (SADC). Retrieved December 12, 2021, from https://www.sadc.int/pillars/livestock-production

  • Swanepoel, F., Stroebel, A., & Moyo, S. (2010). The role of livestock in developing communities: Enhancing multifunctionality. The University of the Free State and CTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzania Livestock Masterplan (TLMP). (2021). The Livestock Masterplan for 2017/2018 – 2021/2022. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://www.mifugouvuvi.go.tz/uploads/projects/1553601793-TANZANIA%20LIVESTOCK%20MASTER%20PLAN.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felician Andrew Kitole.

Ethics declarations

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

The authors are ready and willing to publish with the journal.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitole, F.A., Sesabo, J.K. Smallholder Livestock Keepers’ Breeding Choices and Its Implication on Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from Tanzania. Glob Soc Welf 9, 241–251 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-022-00252-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-022-00252-9

Keywords

Navigation