Abstract
This is a continuation of our combinatorial program on the enumeration of Borel orbits in symmetric spaces of classical types. Here, we determine the generating series the numbers of Borel orbits in \({\mathbf {SO}}_{2n+1}/{\mathbf {S(O}}_{2p}\times {\mathbf {O}}_{2q+1} \mathbf {)}\) (type BI) and in \({\mathbf {Sp}}_n/{\mathbf {Sp}}_p \times {\mathbf {Sp}}_q\) (type CII). In addition, we explore relations to lattice path enumeration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brion, M.: Quelques propriétés des espaces homogènes sphériques. Manuscr. Math. 55, 191 (1986)
Babbitt, D.G., Varadarajan, V.S.: Formal reduction theory of meromorphic differential equations: a group theoretic view. Pac. J. Math. 109(1), 1–80 (1983)
Can, M.B., Joyce, M., Wyser, B.J.: Chains in weak order posets associated with involutions. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 137, 207–225 (2016)
Can, M.B., Uğurlu, Ö.: The genesis of involutions (polarizations and lattice points). arXiv:1703.09881 (2018)
Howe, R.E.: Perspectives on Invariant Theory. The Schur Lectures (1992) (Tel Aviv). Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, vol. 8, pp. 1–182. (1995)
Matsuki, T., Oshima, T.: Embeddings of Discrete Series Into Principal Series. In: The Orbit Method in Representation Theory (Copenhagen, 1988), Progr. Math., vol. 82, pp. 147–175. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston (1990)
McGovern, W.M.: Closures of \(K\)-orbits in the flag variety for \(U(p, q)\). J. Algebra 322(8), 2709–2712 (2009)
Turrittin, H.L.: Convergent solutions of ordinary linear homogeneous differential equations in the neighborhood of an irregular singular point. Acta Math. 93, 27–66 (1955)
Wyser, B.J.: Symmetric Subgroup Orbit Closures on Flag Varieties: Their Equivariant Geometry, Combinatorics, and Connections with Degeneracy Loci. arXiv:1201.4397 (2012)
Wyser, B.J.: \(K\)-Orbits on \(G/B\) and schubert constants for pairs of signed shuffles in types C and D. J. Algebra 360, 67–87 (2012)
Wyser, B.J.: The Bruhat order on clans. J. Algebraic Comb. 44(3), 495–517 (2016)
Woo, A., Wyser, B.J., Yong, A.: Governing singularities of symmetric orbit closures. Algebra Number Theory 12(1), 173–225 (2018)
Yamamoto, A.: Orbits in the flag variety and images of the moment map for classical groups. I. Represent. Theory 1, 329–404 (1997). (electronic)
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a grant from the Louisiana Board of Regents. We are thankful to Roger Howe who shared with us his manuscript on \(K\backslash G / B\)-decomposition of classical groups. We are grateful to the anonymous referee for the very careful reading and for the constructive suggestions, which improved the quality of our paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
In this appendix, as we promised in the introduction, we outline a method for approximating the number of symmetric \((2p,2q+1)\) clans with k pairs, \(\beta _{k,p,q}\). Recall our notation that \(A_e(x) = \sum \nolimits _{l=0}^{q} \beta _{2l,p,q} x^{2l}\) and \(A_o(x) = \sum \nolimits _{l=0}^{q} \beta _{2l+1,p,q} x^{2l+1}\).
First of all, by multiplying both sides of the recurrence relation (3.8) by \(x^{2l}\) and summing over l lead us to the following integral/differential equation
We get rid of the integrals by taking the derivative with respect to x and then we reorganize our equation which is now a second order ODE as in
By applying a similar procedure to the recurrence relation (3.9) and also by using the fact that \(\beta _{1,p,q} = p \beta _{0,p,q}\), we obtain our second second order ODE:
Note that we the following initial conditions that follow from the definitions of \(A_e(x)\) and \(A_o(x)\):
We will reduce our second order system to a first order ODE by setting \(u(x):=A_e^{'}(x)\) and \(v(x):=A_o^{'}(x)\). Then
We write this system in matrix form
where A(x) the \(4\times 4\) matrix as in (1.5). Note that our initial conditions become
Once a system of first order ordinary differential equations of this type is given, formal series solutions can always be obtained by carrying out the computational procedure, which is outlined in Turrittin (1955). We will use those techniques to solve the above system of first order ordinary differential equations.
Before proceeding any further let us define the matrices \(A_0,A_1,\ldots \) by decomposing the coefficient matrix A(x):
Since the eigenvalues of the leading matrix \(A_0\) fall into two groups, namely \(\lambda _1 = \lambda _2 = 0\) and \(\lambda _3 = \lambda _4 = 2\), there exists a normalizing transformation matrix P obtained from the Jordan canonical form of \(A_0\). More precisely, since
the normalizing transformation \(X = PY\) turns our system into
where
We denote the coefficient matrix of \(x^i\) (\(i=0,1,2,\ldots \)) in B(x) by \(B_i\). Thus,
We will work with a system that is obtained from B(x) by a “shearing” transformation. Let Q be a formal power series of the form \(Q=\sum Q_r x^r\) with \(Q_r\)’s are some constant matrices of order 4. We assume that our desired solution \(Y=Y(x)\) for \(x^3 Y' = B Y\) is of the form \(Y=QZ\) for some \(4\times 1\) column matrix \(Z=Z(x)\). Formally, substituting QZ into \(x^3 Y' = B(x) Y\) will give us a new ODE:
Let C denote the formal power series \(\sum C_r x^r\) that is defined by
hence our ODE is equivalent to
By multiplying both sides of (6.3) with Q and rearranging we obtain a new ODE whose solution will lead to a solution of (6.5):
To solve (6.5) we simply substitute \(B=\sum B_r x^r\), \(Q=\sum Q_r x^r\) and \(C=\sum C_r x^r\) and equate the coefficients. Then we get the following relations which we call as our fundamental recurrences:
-
(i)
\(0= Q_0 C_0 - B_0 Q_0\);
-
(ii)
\(0= (Q_0 C_1 - B_1 Q_0)+(Q_1C_0 - B_0Q_1)\);
-
(iii)
\((r-2)Q_{r-2} = \sum \nolimits _{i=0}^r (Q_i C_{r-i} - B_{r-i} Q_i)\) for \(r\ge 2\).
We will recursively assign specific values to the matrices \(Q_i\), \(i=0,1,2,\ldots \) which will allow us to solve (6.5). Along the way we will determine the series \(C(x)=\sum x^i C_i\), which is what we want to solve in the first place. Indeed, our goal is to choose \(Q_i\)’s in such a way that \(C_i\)’s become block diagonal. To this end, we assume that \(Q_i\) (\(i=0,1,2,\ldots \)) is a block anti-diagonal matrix:
for some \(2\times 2\) matrices \(Q_i^{12},Q_i^{21}\) (\(i=0,1,2,\ldots \)).
Step 1. We choose \(Q_0=I_4\), the \(4\times 4\) identity matrix. It follows from (i) that
We have a remark in order.
Remark 6.1
Let us point out that, since
by using the fundamental recurrences (ii) and (iii) we will always be able to choose \(Q_i^{12}\) and \(Q_i^{21}\) so that \(C_i\) is of the form
where \(C_i^{11}\) and \(C_i^{22}\) are \(2\times 2\) matrices.
Step 2. By (ii) and Step 1, \(C_1 = B_1 -Q_1 C_0+ B_0 Q_1\), so we set
Step 3. By (iii) and Steps 1,2, \(C_2 = B_2 -Q_1 C_1+ B_1 Q_1 -Q_2C_0 + B_0 Q_2\), so we set
In a similar manner, we put
The above computations are in some sense are our initial conditions. To get a better understanding of the general case we make a few more preliminary observations and formal computations.
Finally, since \(B_r = 0\), the fundamental recurrence (iii) simplifies to
Recall that we started with the system \(x^3 X' = A(x) X\) which is transformed into \(x^3 Y' = B(x) Y\) by conjugating with a constant matrix, and the latter system is transformed into \(x^3 Z' = C(x) Z\) by the shearing transformation \(Y= Q(x) Z\).
Proposition 6.2
Let \(C(x) = \sum \nolimits _r C_r x^r\) and \(Q(x) = \sum \nolimits _r Q_r x^r\) be as in the previous paragraph. If \(r\ge 4\), then we have
In particular, the system \(x^3 Z' = C(x) Z\) decomposes into two \(2\times 2\) systems of ODE’s
where
Proof
Since \(C_r\) is a block diagonal matrix, recurrence (6.12) combined with equations (6.7)–(6.11) gives us the desired result. \(\square \)
What remains is to solving the systems (6.13) and (6.14). The former ODE is relatively easy since it does not have a singularity anymore. However, the second ODE (6.14) does have a singularity. Moreover, we still do not know the exact forms of neither \(Q^{12}(x)\) nor \(Q^{21}(x)\). On the positive side, by taking advantage of the particular structure of B(x)’s we are able to find recurrences for R(x) and T(x).
To find a recurrence for the blocks of \(Q_r\)’s, we use Proposition 6.2 as well as the simplified fundamental recurrence (6.12) as follows:
Observe that the diagonal blocks do not give us any new information, however, the anti-diagonal blocks do. By the equality of the bottom left blocks, we have
Similarly, the equality of the top right blocks give
Obviously, these recurrences enable us to write the precise forms of the ODE’s (6.13) and (6.14). Both of these ODE’s can now be solved by applying suitable shearing transformations leading to a solution of our original equation \(x^3 X'=A(x) X\). However, due to its high computational cost the result is still not better than the expressions for \(\beta _{k,p,q}\)’s that we recorded in Theorem 1.2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Can, M.B., Uğurlu, Ö. Counting Borel Orbits in Symmetric Spaces of Types BI and CII. Arnold Math J. 4, 213–250 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40598-018-0092-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40598-018-0092-3