Skip to main content
Log in

Effective Research Mentorship for Residents: Meeting the Needs of Early Career Physicians

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Challenges in pursuing research during residency may contribute to the shortage of clinician-scientists. Although the importance of mentorship in facilitating academic research careers has been described, little is understood about early career research mentorship for residents. The aim of this study was to better understand the mentorship process in the context of psychiatry residency.

Method

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced faculty mentors in a psychiatry department at a large academic medical center. Interviews were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results from faculty interviews identified several key themes that were explored with an additional sample of resident mentees.

Results

Five themes emerged in our study: (1) being compatible: shared interests, methods, and working styles; (2) understanding level of development and research career goals in the context of residency training; (3) establishing a shared sense of expectations about time commitment, research skills, and autonomy; (4) residents’ identity as a researcher; and (5) the diverse needs of a resident mentee. There was considerable congruence between mentor and mentee responses.

Conclusions

There is an opportunity to improve research mentoring practice by providing guidance to both mentors and mentees that facilitates a more structured approach to the mentorship relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Alberts B, Kirschner MW, Tilghman S, Varmus H. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:5773–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24733905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zemlo TR, Garrison HH, Partridge NC, Ley TJ. The physician-scientist: career issues and challenges at the year 2000. FASEB J: Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2000;14(2):221–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yin HL, Gabrilove J, Jackson R, Sweeney C, Fair AM, Toto R. Sustaining the clinical and translational research workforce. Acad Med. 2015;90:1. [Internet] Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001888-900000000-98792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenberg L. Research training in psychiatry residency: strategies for reform. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:1930–1. [Internet] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rotherberg MB. Overcoming the obstacles to research during residency. J Am Med Assoc. 2012;308:2191–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rivera JA, Levine RB, Wright SM. Brief report: completing a scholarly project during residency training - perspectives of residents who have been successful. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:366–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kupfer DJ, Schatzberg AF, Grochocinski VJ, Dunn LO, Kelley KA, O’Hara RM. The career development institute for psychiatry: an innovative, longitudinal program for physician-scientists. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33:313–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Burns LJ, Clayton CP, George JN, Mitchell BS, Gitlin SD. The effect of an intense mentoring program on junior Investigators’ preparation for a patient-oriented clinical research career. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1061–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donaldson LJ, Cresswell PA. Dissemination of the work of public health medicine trainees in peer-reviewed publications: an unfulfilled potential. Public Health. 1996;110:61–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;296(9):1103–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16954490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Steiner JF, Curtis P, Lanphear BP, Vu KO, Main DS. Assessing the role of influential mentors in the research development of primary care fellows. Acad Med. 2004;79(9):865–72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15326013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Detsky AS, Baerlocher MO. Academic mentoring--how to give it and how to get it. JAMA. 2007;297:2134–6. [Internet] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17507350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Silberman EK, Belitsky R, Bernstein CA, Cabaniss DL, Crisp-Han H, Dickstein LJ, et al. Recruiting researchers in psychiatry: the influence of residency vs. early motivation. Acad Psychiatry. 2012;36:85–90. [Internet] Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1176/appi.ap.10010010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Sullivan PA, Niehaus B, Lockspeiser TM, Irby DM. Becoming an academic doctor: perceptions of scholarly careers. Med Educ. 2009;43:335–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho CS, Ramanan RA, Feldman MD. Defining the ideal qualities of mentorship: a qualitative analysis of the characteristics of outstanding mentors. Am J Med. 2011;124:453–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kram K. Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview: Scott Foresman; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Allen TD, Eby LT, Lentz E. Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: closing the gap between research and practice. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:567–78. [Internet] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16737355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McMillan W. Theory in healthcare education research: the importance of worldview. Researching medical education [internet]. Chichester: Wiley; 2015. p. 15–24. doi:10.1002/9781118838983.ch2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sargeant J. Qualitative research part II: participants, analysis, and quality assurance. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(1):1–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36(6):717–32. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x/full [Internet].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. QSR International. QSR Nvivo. 2014. Available from: www.qsrinternational.com. Last accessed 1 Mar 2016.

  22. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage; 2015.

  23. Quinn Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA; 2001.

  24. Frambach JM, van der Vleuten CPM, Durning SJ. AM last page: quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson WB. The intentional mentor: strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring. Prof Psychol: Res Pract. 2002;33:88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Keyser DJ, Lakoski JM, Lara-Cinisomo S, Schultz DJ, Williams VL, Zellers DF, et al. Advancing institutional efforts to support research mentorship: a conceptual framework and self-assessment tool. Acad Med. 2008;83(3):217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78(3):328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee A. How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. 2008; Available from: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/info_sci/10. Last accessed 1 Mar 2016.

  29. European Psychiatric Association. Annual Report [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.europsy.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/reportepa-2011_web1.pdf. Last accessed 1 Mar 2016.

  30. Seaburg LA, Wang AT, West CP, Reed DA, Halvorsen AJ, Engstler G, et al. Associations between resident physicians’ publications and clinical performance during residency training. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:22. [Internet] Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/16/22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerrit I. van Schalkwyk.

Ethics declarations

This study was deemed exempt from full review by the Yale University Human Subjects Committee. Informed consent was obtained from participants, and strict privacy standards were enforced.

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

Internally funded through funds of Dr Robert Rohrbaugh and Dr Susan van Schalkwyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Schalkwyk, G.I., Katz, R.B., Resignato, J. et al. Effective Research Mentorship for Residents: Meeting the Needs of Early Career Physicians. Acad Psychiatry 41, 326–332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0625-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0625-9

Keywords

Navigation