Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of Geolocation and Distance to Exposure Sources from Geographical Information Systems for Environmental Monitoring of Toxic Metal Exposures Based on Correlation with Biological Samples: a Systematic Review

  • Metals and Health (TR Sanchez and M Tellez-Plaza, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Environmental Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In epidemiologic studies, biomarkers are the best possible choice to assess individual exposure to toxic metals since they integrate all exposure sources. However, measuring biomarkers is not always feasible, given potential budgetary and time constraints or limited availability of samples. Alternatively, approximations to individual metal exposure obtained from geographic information systems (GIS) have become popular to evaluate diverse metal-related health outcomes.

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of epidemiological studies that evaluated the validity of GIS-based geolocation and distance to pollutant sources as an approximation of individual metal exposure based on correlation with biological samples.

Recent Findings

We considered 11 toxic metals: lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), antimony (Sb), aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), tungsten (W), uranium (U), and vanadium (V). The final review included 12 manuscripts which included seven metals (Pb, Cd, Al, As, Cr, Hg, and Ni). Many studies used geolocation of the individuals to compare exposed (industrial, urban, agricultural, or landfill sources) and unexposed areas and not so many studies used distance to a source. For all metals, except lead, there was more animal than human biosampling to conduct biological validation.

Summary

We observed a trend towards higher levels of Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb in biosamples collected closer to exposure sources, supporting that GIS-based proxies for these metals might approximate individual exposure. However, given the low number and heterogeneity of the retrieved studies, the accumulated evidence is, overall, not sufficient. Given the practical benefits and potential of modern GIS technologies, which allow environmental monitoring at a reasonable cost, additional validation studies that include human biosampling are needed to support the use of GIS-based individual exposure measures in epidemiologic studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Nordberg GF, Fowler BA, Nordberg M, Friberg LT. Handbook on the toxicology of metals, 4th edn. Academic Press, 2015.

  2. Matović V, Buha A, Dukić-Ćosić D, Bulat Z. Insight into the oxidative stress induced by lead and/or cadmium in blood, liver and kidneys. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015;1(78):130–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Genchi G, Sinicropi MS, Lauria G, Carocci A, Catalano A. The effects of cadmium toxicity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3782.

  4. Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. A review on the distribution of Hg in the environment and its human health impacts. J Hazard Mater. 2016;5(306):376–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohammed Abdul KS, Jayasinghe SS, Chandana EPS, Jayasumana C, de Silva PMCS. Arsenic and human health effects: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;40(3):828–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nigra AE, Ruiz-Hernandez A, Redon J, Navas-Acien A, Tellez-Plaza M. Environmental metals and cardiovascular disease in adults: a systematic review beyond lead and cadmium. Current environmental health reports [Internet]. 2016 Dec 1 [cited 2021 Nov 16];3(4):416. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5801549/

  7. Killin LOJ, Starr JM, Shiue IJ, Russ TC. Environmental risk factors for dementia: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics 2016 16:1 [Internet]. 2016 Oct 12 [cited 2021 Nov 4];16(1):1–28. Available from: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0342-y

  8. Chen YE, Cui JM, Yang JC, Zhang ZW, Yuan M, Song C, et al. Biomonitoring heavy metal contaminations by moss visible parameters. Journal of Hazardous Materials [Internet]. 2015 Apr 22 [cited 2021 Nov 18];296:201–9. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/25919648

  9. Cambra K, Martínez–Rueda T, Alonso–Fustel E, Cirarda FB, Ibáñez B, Esnaola S, et al. Mortality in small geographical areas and proximity to air polluting industries in the Basque Country (Spain). Occupational and Environmental Medicine [Internet]. 2011 Feb 1 [cited 2021 Nov 4];68(2):140–7. Available from: https://oem.bmj.com/content/68/2/140

  10. García-Pérez J, Fernández de Larrea-Baz N, Lope V, Molina AJ, O’Callaghan-Gordo C, Alonso MH, et al. Residential proximity to industrial pollution sources and colorectal cancer risk: a multicase-control study (MCC-Spain). Environment International. 2020 Nov 1;144:106055.

  11. Ramis R, Diggle P, Cambra K, López-Abente G. Prostate cancer and industrial pollution: risk around putative focus in a multi-source scenario. Environ Int. 2011;37(3):577–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Filippelli G, Anenberg S, Taylor M, van Geen A, Khreis H. New approaches to identifying and reducing the global burden of disease from pollution. GeoHealth [Internet]. 2020 Apr 1 [cited 2021 Nov 18];4(4). Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7097880/

  13. Bauleo L, Ruggieri F, Bucci S, Pino A, Antonucci C, Bocca B, et al. La valutazione dell’esposizione a contaminanti ambientali: modelli di dispersione e biomonitoraggio umano. Epidemiologia e prevenzione [Internet]. 2019 Jul 1 [cited 2021 Nov 18];43(4):260–9. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337945155_Exposure_assessment_to_air_pollutants_dispersion_models_versus_human_biomonitoring

  14. Chio CP, Yuan TH, Shie RH, Chan CC. Assessing vanadium and arsenic exposure of people living near a petrochemical complex with two-stage dispersion models. Journal of hazardous materials [Internet]. 2014 Apr 30 [cited 2021 Nov 18];271:98–107. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24607528/

  15. Dreassi E, Lagazio C, Maule MM, Magnani C, Biggeri A. Sensitivity analysis of the relationship between disease occurrence and distance from a putative source of pollution. Geospatial health [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2021 Nov 18];2(2):263–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18686274/

  16. Hodgson S, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Colvile R, Jarup L. Assessment of exposure to mercury from industrial emissions: comparing “distance as a proxy” and dispersion modelling approaches. Occupational and environmental medicine [Internet]. 2007 Jun [cited 2021 Nov 18];64(6):380–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17182645/

  17. Blanco G, Frías O, Jiménez B, Gómez G. Factors influencing variability and potential uptake routes of heavy metals in black kites exposed to emissions from a solid-waste incinerator. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry [Internet]. 2003 Nov 1 [cited 2021 Nov 5];22(11):2711–8. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1897/02-519

  18. Amadou A, Praud D, Coudon T, Danjou AMN, Faure E, Leffondré K, et al. Chronic long-term exposure to cadmium air pollution and breast cancer risk in the French E3N cohort. International Journal of Cancer [Internet]. 2020 Jan 15 [cited 2021 Nov 4];146(2):341–51. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32257

  19. Roos A de, Davis S, Colt J, Blair A, Airola M, Severson R, et al. Residential proximity to industrial facilities and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Environmental research [Internet]. 2010 Jan [cited 2021 Nov 5];110(1):70. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC2795078/

  20. Kim Y-D, Eom S-Y, Yim D-H, Kim I-S, Won H-K, Park C-H, et al. Environmental exposure to arsenic, lead, and cadmium in people living near Janghang copper smelter in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science [Internet]. 2016 Apr 1 [cited 2021 Nov 4];31(4):489–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.4.489

  21. Kłos A, Ziembik Z, Rajfur M, Dołhańczuk-Śródka A, Bochenek Z, Bjerke JW, et al. Using moss and lichens in biomonitoring of heavy-metal contamination of forest areas in southern and north-eastern Poland. Sci Total Environ. 2018;627:438–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muntner P, Menke A, DeSalvo KB, Rabito FA, Batuman V. Continued decline in blood lead levels among adults in the United States: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Archives of internal medicine [Internet]. 2005 Oct 10 [cited 2022 Jan 13];165(18):2155–61. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16217007/

  23. Toxicological profile for lead. [Internet]. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2007 [cited 2022 Jan 12]. Available from: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/%0Atoxprofiles/tp.asp?id=96&tid=22

  24. Menke A, Muntner P, Batuman V, Silbergeld EK, Guallar E. Blood lead below 0.48 micromol/L (10 microg/dL) and mortality among US adults. Circulation [Internet]. 2006 Sep [cited 2022 Jan 13];114(13):1388–94. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16982939/

  25. Navas-Acien A, Guallar E, Silbergeld EK, Rothenberg SJ. Lead exposure and cardiovascular disease—a systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives [Internet]. 2007 Mar [cited 2022 Jan 13];115(3):472. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC1849948/

  26. Miranda ML, Anthopolos R, Hastings D. A geospatial analysis of the effects of aviation gasoline on childhood blood lead levels. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(10):1513–6 (This study uses distances from airports to show that lead levels are higher in children living close to this facilities).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin Y-Y, Guo Y-LL, Chen P-C, Liu J-H, Wu H-C, Hwang Y-H. Associations between petrol-station density and manganese and lead in the cord blood of newborns living in Taiwan. Environ Res. 2011;111(2):260–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Markowski M, Bańbura M, Kaliński A, Markowski J, Skwarska J, Wawrzyniak J, et al. Spatial and temporal variation of lead, cadmium, and zinc in feathers of great tit and blue tit nestlings in Central Poland. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;67(4):507–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pająk M, Halecki W, Gąsiorek M. Accumulative response of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) to heavy metals enhanced by Pb-Zn ore mining and processing plants: explicitly spatial considerations of ordinary kriging based on a GIS approach. Chemosphere. 2017;168:851–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dolan KJ, Ciesielski TM, Lierhagen S, Eulaers I, Nygård T, Johnsen TV, et al. Trace element concentrations in feathers and blood of Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) nestlings from Norway and Spain. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2017;144:564–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Badry A, Palma L, Beja P, Ciesielski TM, Dias A, Lierhagen S, et al. Using an apex predator for large-scale monitoring of trace element contamination: associations with environmental, anthropogenic and dietary proxies. Sci Total Environ. 2019;676:746–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Graber LK, Asher D, Anandaraja N, Bopp RF, Merrill K, Cullen MR, et al. Childhood lead exposure after the phaseout of leaded gasoline: an ecological study of school-age children in Kampala Uganda. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(6):884–9 ((This study showed elevated blood lead levels (EBLLs; ≥ 10 μg/dL) in children living at a distance < 0.5 mile from the landfill.)).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Espinosa C, Rojas M, Seijas D. Usefulness of the geographic information system (GIS) in the identification of contributing factors to lead blood concentrations in a population of Venezuelan children. Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48(2):84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Toxicological profile for cadmium. [Internet]. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2012 [cited 2022 Jan 12]. Available from: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/%0Atp.asp?id=48&tid=15

  35. Tellez-Plaza M, Navas-Acien A, Caldwell KL, Menke A, Muntner P, Guallar E. Reduction in cadmium exposure in the United States population, 1988–2008: the contribution of declining smoking rates. Environmental health perspectives [Internet]. 2012 Feb [cited 2022 Jan 13];120(2):204–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22062584/

  36. Chiang P-H, Chan T-C, Hsieh DPH. A GIS-aided assessment of the health hazards of cadmium in farm soils in central Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(9):3759–63 ((This paper shows the significance of the definition of the sought exposure window together with the sample matrix in the design of the study in order to achieve the desire objective.)).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Polat F, Akın Ş, Yıldırım A, Dal T. The effects of point pollutants-originated heavy metals (lead, copper, iron, and cadmium) on fish living in Yeşilırmak River. Turkey Toxicol Indust Health. 2016;32(8):1438–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tietz T, Lenzner A, Elena Kolbaum A, Zellmer S, Riebeling C, Gürtler R, et al. Aggregated aluminium exposure: risk assessment for the general population. Archives of Toxicology [Internet]. 2019;93:3503–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02599-z

  39. Karunarathne A, Bhalla A, Sethi A, Perera U, Eddleston M. Importance of pesticides for lethal poisoning in India during 1999 to 2018: a systematic review. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2021;21(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11156-2

  40. Jamshidi F, Ghorbani A, Darvishi S, Davoodzadeh H. Study of laboratory profile in patients with aluminium phosphide poisoning in the southwest of Iran from 2010 to 2015. Archiwum medycyny sadowej i kryminologii [Internet]. 2016;66(3):149–57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5114/amsik.2016.66399

  41. Oghabian Z, Ahmadi J, Pakravan S, Dabaghzadeh F, Heidari MR, Tajaddini S, et al. Successful treatment of aluminium phosphide poisoning by dihydroxyacetone: a two-case report study. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1 [cited 2022 Jan 11];45(5):1194–8. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13194

  42. Huat TJ, Camats-Perna J, Newcombe EA, Valmas N, Kitazawa M, Medeiros R. Metal toxicity links to Alzheimer’s disease and neuroinflammation. Journal of molecular biology [Internet]. 2019 Apr 19 [cited 2022 Jan 11];431(9):1843–68. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30664867/

  43. Chung JY, Yu S do, Hong YS. Environmental source of arsenic exposure. Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi [Internet]. 2014 Sep 1 [cited 2022 Jan 11];47(5):253–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25284196/

  44. Palma-Lara I, Martínez-Castillo M, Quintana-Pérez JC, Arellano-Mendoza MG, Tamay-Cach F, Valenzuela-Limón OL, et al. Arsenic exposure: a public health problem leading to several cancers. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1 [cited 2022 Jan 11];110. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31765675/

  45. Ratnaike RN. Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgraduate medical journal [Internet]. 2003 Jul 1 [cited 2022 Jan 11];79(933):391–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12897217/

  46. Baker BA, Cassano VA, Murray C, Dreger M. Arsenic exposure, assessment, toxicity, diagnosis, and management: guidance for occupational and environmental physicians. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Jan 11];60(12):E634–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30358658/

  47. Barceloux DG. Chromium. Journal of toxicology Clinical toxicology [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2022 Jan 16];37(2):173–94. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10382554/

  48. Chromium (Cr) Toxicity: where is chromium found? | Environmental Medicine | ATSDR [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/chromium/where_is_chromium_found.html

  49. Vincent JB, Lukaski HC. Chromium. Advances in Nutrition [Internet]. 2018 Jul 1 [cited 2022 Jan 16];9(4):505. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6054252/

  50. Shafiq M, Shaukat T, Nazir A, Bareen F-E. Modeling of Cr contamination in the agricultural lands of three villages near the leather industry in Kasur, Pakistan, using statistical and GIS techniques. Environ Monit Assess. 2017;189(8):423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Park JD, Zheng W. Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health [Internet]. 2012 Nov [cited 2022 Jan 16];45(6):344. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3514464/

  52. Kolipinski M, Subramanian M, Kristen K, Borish S, Ditta S. Sources and toxicity of mercury in the San Francisco bay area, spanning california and beyond. Journal of environmental and public health [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 16];2020. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33014081/

  53. Ruiz-Hernandez A, Kuo CC, Rentero-Garrido P, Tang WY, Redon J, Ordovas JM, et al. Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7(1)

  54. Bernhoft RA. Mercury toxicity and treatment: a review of the literature. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012

  55. Kopec AD, Kidd KA, Fisher NS, Bowen M, Francis C, Payne K, et al. Spatial and temporal trends of mercury in the aquatic food web of the lower Penobscot River, Maine, USA, affected by a chlor-alkali plant. Sci Total Environ. 2019;649:770–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Genchi G, Carocci A, Lauria G, Sinicropi MS, Catalano A. Nickel: human health and environmental toxicology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030679

  57. Garcia-Vargas GG, Rothenberg SJ, Silbergeld EK, Weaver V, Zamoiski R, Resnick C, Rubio-Andrade M, Parsons PJ, Steuerwald AJ, Navas-Acién A, Guallar E. Spatial clustering of toxic trace elements in adolescents around the Torreón Mexico lead-zinc smelter. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014;24(6):634–42 (This cross-sectional study of 512 male and female subjects 12-15 years of age, residents in Torreón, northern Mexico, host to the world’s fourth largest lead–zinc metal smelter, showed that children living downwind of the facility presented high blood Pb and urine Cd).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Staessen JA, Vyncke G, Lauwerys RR, Roels HA, Celis HG, Claeys F, Dondeyne F, Fagard RH, Ide G, Lijnen PJ, et al. Transfer of cadmium from a sandy acidic soil to man: a population study. Environ Res. 1992;58(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80202-6 ((Cadmidel studies in Belgium investigated the association between the Cd levels in blood and urine and the Cd concentration in the soil, showed that those subjects who consumed vegetables grown in kitchen gardens on a sandy acidic soil had higher urinary Cd levels.)).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Jones MR, Tellez-Plaza M, Vaidya D, Grau M, Francesconi KA, Goessler W, Guallar E, Post WS, Kaufman JD, Navas-Acien A. Estimation of inorganic arsenic exposure in populations with frequent seafood intake: evidence from MESA and NHANES. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(8):590–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors conceptualized the review. A.B.A., M.A.C., D.C., and R.R. developed the search strategy. A.B.A., M.A.C., and D.C. reviewed all the retrieved abstracts. R.R. acted as fourth reviewer in case of inconsistent article selection. A.B.A., M.A.C., and D.C. drafted the data extraction tables. R.R. assisted in editing data extraction tables. All the authors interpreted the data extraction tables. A.B.A., M.A.C., and D.C. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. R.R. reviewed, edited, and approved the ultimate draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebeca Ramis.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

This article presents independent research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Carlos III Institute of Health.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Metals and Health

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernal-Alonso, A., Alonso-Colon, M., Cifo, D. et al. Validity of Geolocation and Distance to Exposure Sources from Geographical Information Systems for Environmental Monitoring of Toxic Metal Exposures Based on Correlation with Biological Samples: a Systematic Review. Curr Envir Health Rpt 9, 735–757 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00383-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00383-3

Keywords

Navigation