Abstract
Background
The benefits and risks of treating hypertension in old and frail patients are debated.
Aim
The aim of the present study is to measure the frailty status in older patients with hypertension and determine the relationships existing between blood pressure (BP) values and frailty.
Methods
Frailty was retrospectively assessed by using the frailty index (FI) in 56 hypertensive old outpatients. Patients with an FI > 0.25 were classified as frail.
Results
Forty-five out of 56 (80%) had a FI > 0.25. A statistically significant inverse correlation was found between FI and systolic BP (r = −0.319, p = 0.016), orthostatic systolic BP (r = −0.408, p = 0.002), orthostatic diastolic BP (r = −0.299, p = 0.025), and orthostatic pulse pressure (r = −0.297, p = 0.026).
Discussion
Frailer subjects appear as over-treated according to current European guidelines.
Conclusions
FI can play an important role in the clinical setting by supporting the identification of subjects at risk and allowing an improved provision of adapted and personalized care.
References
Bromfield SG, Bowling CB, Tanner RM et al (2014) Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control among US adults 80 years and olders, 1988–2010. J Clin Hypertens 16:270–276
Marzetti E, Sanna T, Calvani R et al (2016) Brand new medicine for an older society. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:558–559
Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 34:2159–2219
Muller M, Smulders YM, de Leeuw PW et al (2014) Treatment of hypertension in the oldest old. A critical role for frailty? Hypertension 63:433–441
Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381:752–762
Rockwood K, Mitnitski A (2012) How might deficit accumulation give rise to frailty? J Frailty Aging 1:8–12
Rockwood MRH, Howlett SE (2011) Blood pressure in relation to age and frailty. Can Geriatr J 14:2–7
Materson BJ, Garcia-Estrada M, Preston RA (2016) Hypertension in the frailty elderly. J Am Soc Hypertens. doi:10.1016/j.jash.2016.03.187
Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA et al (2008) A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 8:24
Basile G, Catalano A, Mandraffino G et al (2015) Cognitive impairment and slow gait speed in elderly outpatients with arterial hypertension: the effect of blood pressure values. J Am Geriatr Soc 63:1260–1261
Butt DA, Harvey PJ (2015) Benefits and risks of antihypertensive medications in the elderly. J Intern Med 278:599–626
Odden MC, Peralta CA, Haan MN et al (2012) Rethinking the association of high blood pressure with mortality in elderly adults: the impact of frailty. Arch Intern Med 172:1162–1168
Sabayan B, van Vliet P, der Ruijter W et al (2013) High blood pressure, physical and cognitive function, and risk of stroke in the oldest old: the Leiden-85 Plus Study. Stroke 44:15–20
Warwick J, Falaschetti E, Rockwood K et al (2015) No evidence that frailty modifies the positive impact of antihypertensive treatment in very elderly people: an investigation of the impact of frailty upon treatment effect in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of antihypertensives in people with hypertension aged 80 and over. BMC Med 13:78
Pajewski NM, Williamson JD, Applegate WB et al (2016) Characterizing frailty status in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 71:649–655
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basile, G., Catalano, A., Mandraffino, G. et al. Relationship between blood pressure and frailty in older hypertensive outpatients. Aging Clin Exp Res 29, 1049–1053 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0684-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0684-5