Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive pass planning and optimization for robotic welding of complex joints

  • Published:
Advances in Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current industrial robotic welding systems cannot achieve automated solutions for multi-layer multi-pass welding of complex joints due to the presence of non-uniform and irregular welding groove geometries. This paper presents an adaptive pass planning approach for robotic welding of such complex joints. The welding groove is first segmented considering both the variation in groove dimension and the reachability of the robot welding torch. For each welding segment, the welding passes are planned to be in accordance with welding practices, viz., keeping the same number of welding passes in each layer while maintaining consistent welding parameters. An adaptive pass adjustment scheme is developed to address the discrepancies between the simulated results and the actual welding deposition after finishing a few layers of welding. Corresponding robot paths are generated and optimized to ensure minimum joint movement subject to three constraints, viz., reachability, collision-free and singularity avoidance. The proposed approach has been simulated with the arc welding of a Y-type joint found typically in offshore structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorincz J (2015) Robotic welding fills skills gap with quality production. http://www.sme.org/MEMagazine/Article.aspx?id=8589936441. Accessed 26 Oct 2015

  2. Lin W, Luo H (2015) Robotic welding. In: Nee AYC (ed) Springer handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology: robotics and automation. Springer, London, pp 2404–2444

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pires JN, Loureiro A, Bölmsjo G (2006) Welding robots: technology, system issues and application. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neto P, Mendes N (2013) Direct off-line robot programming via a common CAD package. Robot Auton Syst 61(8):896–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reinhart G, Munzert U, Vogl W (2008) A programming system for robot-based remote-laser-welding with conventional optics. Annals of the CIRP 57(1):37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang HC, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2012) Interactive robot trajectory planning and simulation using augmented reality. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28(2):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang HC, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2014) Novel AR-based interface for human-robot interaction and visualization. Adv Manuf 2(4):275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang C, Ye Z, Chen Y et al (2014) Multi-pass path planning for thick plate by DSAW based on vision sensor. Sensor Rev 34(4):416–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao Y, Zhu S, Liang X et al (2011) Overlapping model of beads and curve fitting of bead section for rapid manufacturing by robotic MAG welding process. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27(3):641–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong J, Zhang G, Gao H et al (2013) Modeling of bead section profile and overlapping beads with experimental validation for robotic GMAW-based rapid manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(2):417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suryakumar S, Karunakaran KP, Bernard A et al (2011) Weld bead modeling and process optimization in hybrid layered manufacturing. Comput Aided Design 43(4):331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganjigatti JP, Pratihar DK, Choudhury R (2007) Global versus cluster-wise regression analyses for prediction of bead geometry in MIG welding process. J Mater Process Tech 189:352–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JI, Um KW (2000) Prediction of welding process parameters by prediction of back-bead geometry. J Mater Process Tech 108:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim I, Son J, Park C et al (2002) A study on prediction of bead height in robotic arc welding using a neural network. J Mater Process Tech 130–131:229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagesh DS, Datta GL (2002) Prediction of weld bead geometry and penetration in shielded metal-arc welding using artificial neural networks. J Mater Process Technol 123:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan SJ, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2016) Optimal pass planning for robotic welding of large-dimension joints with deep grooves. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on digital enterprise technology (det2016)—intelligent manufacturing in the knowledge economy era, 29–31 March 2016, Nanjing, China

  17. Huo L, Baron L (2008) The joint-limits and singularity avoidance in robotic welding. Ind Robot 35(5):456–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huo L, Baron L (2011) The self-adaptation of weights for joint-limits and singularity avoidances of functionally redundant robotic-task. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27(2):367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ogbemhe J, Mpofu K (2015) Towards achieving a fully intelligent robotic arc welding: a review. Ind Robot 42(5):475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang HC, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2016) Robot path planning optimization for welding complex joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9684-z

  21. Rampaul H (2002) Pipe welding procedure, 2nd edn. Industrial Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Singapore A*STAR Agency for Science, Technology and SERC Industrial Robotic Programme on Robotic Welding of Complex Joint (Grant No. 1225100006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Y. C. Nee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, H.C., Ong, S.K. & Nee, A.Y.C. Adaptive pass planning and optimization for robotic welding of complex joints. Adv. Manuf. 5, 93–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0181-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0181-x

Keywords

Navigation