Skip to main content
Log in

Response of root traits of Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina to facilitation

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

C3 plant Reaumuria soongorica and C4 plant Salsola passerina are super xerophytes and coexist in a mixed community in either isolated or associated growth, and interspecific facilitation occurs in associated growth. In the present study, the root traits including root distribution, root length (RL), root surface area (RSA), root weight (RW) and specific root length (SRL) of both species in two growth forms were investigated to clarify their response to facilitation in associated growth. Six isolated plants of each species, as well as six associated plants similar in size and development were selected during the plant growing season, and their roots were excavated at 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40 and 40–50 cm soil depths at the end of the growing season. All the roots of each plant were separated into the two categories of fine roots (<2 mm diameter) and coarse roots (≥2 mm diameter). Root traits such as RL and RSA in the fine and coarse roots were obtained by the root analyzing system WinRHIZO. Most of the coarse roots in R. soongorica and S. passerina were distributed in the top 10 cm of the soil in both growth forms, whereas the fine roots of the two plant species were found mainly in the 10–20 and 20–30 cm soil depths in isolated growth, respectively. However, the fine roots of both species were mostly overlapped in 10–20 cm soil depth in associated growth. The root/canopy ratios of both species reduced, whereas the ratios of their fine roots to coarse roots in RL increased, and both species had an increased SRL in the fine roots in associated growth. In addition, there was the increase in RL of fine roots and content of root N for S. passerina in associated growth. Taken together, the root growth of S. passerina was facilitated for water and nutrient exploration under the interaction of the overlapped roots in both species in associated growth, and higher SRL allowed both species to more effectively adapt to the infertile soil in the desert ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R. 1998. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: Mechanisms, trade-offs, and plant-soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany, 49: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R, Chapin III F S. 1999. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, 30: 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness M D, Callaway R. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness M D, Ewanchuk P J. 2002. Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes. Oecologia, 132: 392–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrick P J. 2003. Competitive and facilitative relationships among three shrub species, and the role of browsing intensity and rooting depth in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14: 761–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavieres L, Arroyo M T K, Penaloza A, et al. 2002. Nurse effect of Bolax gummifera cushion plants in the alpine vegetation of the Chilean Patagonian Andes. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13: 547–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craine J M, Wedin D A, Chapin F S, et al. 2003. Relationship between the structure of root systems and resource use for 11 North American grassland plants. Plant Ecology, 165: 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon H. 2007. Ecology-How do roots interact? Science, 318: 1562–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat D M. 1991. On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: a field study using citrus rootstocks. New Phytologist, 118: 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esler K J, Cowling R M. 1993. Edaphic factors and competition as determinants of pattern in South African karoo vegetation. South African Journal of Botany, 59: 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco A C, Nobel P S. 1989. Effect of nurse plants on the microhabitat and growth of cacti. Journal of Ecology, 77: 870–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Aparcio L, Zamora R, Gomez J M, et al. 2004. Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration: a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants. Ecological Applications, 14: 1128–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogh-Jensen H, Schjoerring J K. 2000. Below-ground nitrogen transfer between different grassland species: direct quantification by 15N leaf feeding compared with indirect dilution of soil 15N. Plant and Soil, 227: 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl K D. 2002. Effect of shrubs on tree seedling establishment in an abandoned tropical pasture. Journal of Ecology, 90: 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B R, Eissenstat D M. 2000. Linking hydraulic conductivity to anatomy in plants that vary in specific root length. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 125: 260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy P A. 1989. Competition. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larrea-Alcázar D M, López R P, Barrientos D. 2005. The nurse-plant effect of Prosopis flexuosa DC (Leg. mim.) in a dry valley of the Bolivian Andes. Ecotropicos, 18: 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law B E, Ryan M G, Anthoni P M. 1999. Seasonal and annual respiration of a ponderosa pine ecosystem. Global Change Biology, 5: 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, et al. 2006. Root distribution and interactions between intercropped species. Oecologia, 147: 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J L, Li F R, Liu C A, et al. 2012. Influences of shrub vegetation on distribution and diversity of a ground beetle community in a Gobi desert ecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21: 2601–2619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre F T, Bautista S, Cortina J. 2003. Positive, negative, and net effects in grass-shrub interactions in Mediterranean semiarid grasslands. Ecology, 84: 3186–3197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H, Kirkby E A, Cakmak I. 1996. Effect of mineral nutritional status on shoot-root partitioning of photoassimilates and cycling of mineral nutrients. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47: 1255–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro M J, Pugnaire F I, Haase P, et al. 1997. Mechanisms of interaction between a leguminous shrub and its understorey in a semi-arid environment. Ecography, 20: 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterheld M, Oyarzabal M. 2004. Grass-to-grass protection from grazing in a semi-arid steppe. Facilitation, competition, and mass effect. Oikos, 107: 576–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Remkes C, Lambers H. 1990. Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Physiology, 94: 621–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugnaire F I, Luque M T. 2001. Changes in plant interactions along a gradient of environmental stress. Oikos, 93: 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu M X, Liu J Q. 1982. The study on the plant community of Salsola passerina. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2: 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffaele E, Veblen T T. 1998. Facilitation by nurse shrubs of resprouting behavior in a post-fire shrubland in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9: 693–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger M, Litvin P. 1999. Root system hydraulic conductivity in species with contrasting root anatomy. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50: 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi B E, Villagra P E. 2003. Effects of Prosopis flexuosa on soil properties and the spatial pattern of understorey species in arid Argentina. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14: 543–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk H J, Jackson R B. 2002. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 90: 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiponeni N, Allsopp N, Carrick P J, et al. 2011. Competitive interactions between grass and succulent shrubs at the ecotone between an arid grassland and succulent shrubland in the Karoo. Plant Ecology, 212: 795–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su P X, Yan Q D, Xie T T, et al. 2012. Associated growth of C3 and C4 desert plants helps the C3 species at the cost of the C4 species. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 34: 2057–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbore S E, Gaudinski J B. 2003. The secret lives of roots. Science, 302: 1344–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox C S, Ferguson J W, Fernandez G C J, et al. 2004. Fine root growth dynamics of four Mojave Desert shrubs as related to soil moisture and microsite. Journal of Arid Environments, 56: 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withington J M, Reich P B, Oleksyn J, et al. 2006. Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecological Monographs, 76: 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Q D, Su P X, Gao S. 2012. Response of photosynthetic characteristics of C3 desert plant Reaumuria soongorica and C4 desert plant Salsola passerina to different drought degrees. Journal of Desert Research, 32: 364–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaton R I, Esler K J. 1990. The dynamics of a succulent karoo vegetation-a study of species association and recruitment. Vegetation, 88: 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to PeiXi Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Su, P., Li, S. et al. Response of root traits of Reaumuria soongorica and Salsola passerina to facilitation. J. Arid Land 6, 628–636 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0024-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0024-6

Keywords

Navigation