Skip to main content
Log in

“YOOFOOD/YO”

Decision of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 July 2020 – Case No. I ZB 80/19

  • Decision • Trade Mark Law
  • Germany
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In the comprehensive assessment of the likelihood of confusion of opposing signs, descriptive elements are not excluded up front or in general from the evaluation of similarity. This does not, however, rule out the possibility of one or more components of a complex mark being characteristic of the overall impression. This standard must also be applied when evaluating a one-word sign composed of several elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Official headnotes. Translated from the German by Allison Felmy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trade Mark Act, Sec. 9(1) No. 2. “YOOFOOD/YO”. IIC 52, 355–362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01042-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01042-0

Keywords

Navigation