Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Dialectic Integration of Dynamic Assessment: Assessing and Instructing EFL Beginning Learners’ Reading Difficulties

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although sociocultural theory has aroused researchers’ interest in investigating the social role in language learning, few studies have investigated the possible effect of sociocultural-based teaching approaches on reading comprehension and ways to increase learners’ strategic reading repertoire. This study employs dynamic assessment (DA), a sociocultural-based assessment tool, to evaluate its dialectic function of simultaneously instructing and assessing the reading comprehension of beginning-level EFL learners. It first diagnoses EFL beginning learners’ reading difficulties and then intervenes with interactive mediation to support their strategic use of the learned reading strategies. Three reading difficulties are focused:(1) finding the main idea; (2) understanding unfamiliar vocabulary, and (3) making inferences. The teacher-learner interactions are presented to show how DA enabled the mediator to diagnose the participant’s reading problems and to provide the appropriate mediation according to each individual’s needs. Results indicated that (1) DA was effective in assisting participants’ reading performance, especially the ones who had lower language proficiency; (2) it could better reveal individual participant’s source of reading difficulty. Findings suggest that DA provides a more comprehensive picture than static assessment does. It can be used to complement reading strategy instruction and reading assessment in EFL contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afflerbach, P. (2007). Working towards a balanced approach: Best practices in literacy assessment. In L. Gambrell, L. Morrow, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 264–282). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajideh, P., & Nourdad, N. (2012). The immediate and delayed effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading ability. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljaafreh, A. J., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(465–483).

  • Block, C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2017). Comprehension strategies instruction for learners of English: Where we have been, where we are now, where we still might go. In S. E. Israeli (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 543–567). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An international approach evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–115). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: Implications for approaches to assessment. In N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M. G. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucchiarini, C. (1993). Phonetic transcription: A methodological and empirical study. S.I: S.N.

  • Davoudi, M., & Yousefi, D. (2015). Comprehension breakdown: A review of research on EFL learners’ reading difficulty and problems. International Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 1, 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R. F. (1997). Dynamic testing. In R. F. Dillon (Ed.), Handbook on testing (pp. 164–186). Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00047-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (Vol. 3, pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.

  • Feuerstein, R., & Feuerstein, S. (1991). Mediated learning experience: A theoretical review. In R. Feuerstein, P. S. Klein, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Mediated learning experience (MLE) (pp. 3–52). Freund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments and techniques. University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafar Samar, R., & Dehqan, M. (2013). Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(3), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, P., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). Children’s learning strategy use and the effects of strategy instruction on success in learning ESL in Canada. System, 43, 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2005). The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 227–252). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Newbern, C. (2012). The effects of metacognitive reading strategy instruction on reading performance of adult ESL learners with limited english and literacy skills. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 1(2), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2003). Can strategy instruction help EFL learners to improve their reading ability? An empirical study. JACET Bulletin, 37, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: Pedagogical implications for EFL/ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 150–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2001). A sociocultural theoretical perspective on teacher professional development. In K. E. Johnson & P. R. Golombek (Eds.), Research on second language teacher education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, Y.-T. (2015). How interactive discussions support writing development: The application of dynamic assessment for learning Chinese rhetoric. Language Testing in Asia, 5(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0022-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, Y.-T., & Kuo, H.-C. (2021). Diagnosing L2 English learners’ listening difficulties and learning needs through computerized dynamic assessment. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1876738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpov, Y. V., & Tzuriel, D. (2009). Dynamic assessment: Progress, problems, and prospects. Journal of Cognitive Educational and Psychology, 8(3), 228–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kispal, A. (2008). Effective teaching of inference skills for reading: Literature review (DCSF Research Report031). Retrieved from National Foundation for Educational Research:

  • Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment for EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A., & Grab, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mcakey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Equinox Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2010). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Throne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the genesis of second language development. New York Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghsudi, M., & Talebi, S. H. (2009). The impact of lingualuity on the cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies awareness and reading comprehension ability. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoli, P., Papadopoulou, M., & Metallidou, P. (2016). Investigating the immediate and delayed effects of multiple-reading strategy instruction in primary EFL classrooms. System, 56, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension: The effect of adding a dynamic assessment component on EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 688–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrnoosh, L., & Rassaei, E. (2015). Dynamic assessment: From underlying constructs to implications for language teaching. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 4(2), 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeini, J., & Duvall, E. (2012). Dynamic assessment and the impact on English language learners’ reading comprehension performance. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oczkus, L. D. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House/Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1996). Language Learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1991). Dynamic assessment. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 75–94). Austin: Texas: Pro-ed.

  • Pena, E., lglesias, A., & Lidz, C. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children‘s word learning ability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 138–154.

  • Pishghadam, R., Barabadi, E., & Kamrood, A. M. (2011). The differing effect of computerized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension on high and low achievers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1353–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French (Doctor of Philosophy). The Pennsylvania State University, Stage College.

  • Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545–563). Erlbaum.

  • Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segalowitz, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, Y.-C., Chern, C.-L., & Reynolds, B. L. (2018). Bringing extensive reading and reading strategies into the Taiwanese junior college classroom. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(1), 130–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi, S., & Safa, M. A. (2020). Group dynamic assessment and EFL learners’ oral production, motivation, and classroom anxiety. English Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00054-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, A. K. (2012). Effects of dynamic assessment on College EFL learners’ reading skills. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(1), 57–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzuriel, D. (2000). Dynamic assessment of young children: Education and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 385–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzuriel, D. (2013). Mediated learning experience and cognitive modifiability. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilawan, S. (2011). Effects of lexical cohesion and macro-rules on EFL students’ main idea comprehension. Reading Improvement, 48(2), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilawan, S. (2012). Fostering main idea comprehension among EFL learners through cognitive and metacognitive strategies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2, 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-H. (2020). The effects of Dynamic Assessment on EFL junior high school students’ English reading comprehension. (Unpublished Master Thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

  • Yang, L., & Wilson, K. (2006). Second language classroom reading: A social constructivist approach. The Reading Matrix, 6(3), 364–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., & Qian, D. (2019). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264510

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Room 9516, No. 116, Heping 1st Rd., Lingya Dist., Kaohsiung City, 802, Taiwan

    Yu-Ting Kao & Hui-Hsun Wu

Authors
  1. Yu-Ting Kao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui-Hsun Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Ting Kao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 198 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kao, YT., Wu, HH. The Dialectic Integration of Dynamic Assessment: Assessing and Instructing EFL Beginning Learners’ Reading Difficulties. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 31, 749–766 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00624-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00624-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation