Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Mathematics Self-Beliefs between Students in Shanghai-China and the USA

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to PISA 2012, mathematics self-beliefs involve three dimensions: mathematics self-efficacy, mathematics self-concept and mathematics anxiety. This study utilized the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) method, an approach for detecting whether there is a lack of measurement invariance or differential item functioning (DIF), to deal with multiple covariates, multiple dimensions, and ordered categorical variables with threshold structures to study DIF among mathematics self-beliefs items across Shanghai-China (N = 5177) and the USA (N = 4978) from Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012. The MIMIC approach with mediators was also applied in the study, which helped to detect variables that could account for meaningful partial or complete DIF effects. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), a statistic method that can verify the number of latent traits of the dataset, indicated that the three-factor structure worked for the data. Both robust weighted least square (WLSMV) estimator and robust maximum likelihood (MLR) estimator were used in the parameter estimation to identify items with DIF and quantify the DIF effect size. It was found in the study with MIMIC method that in-school mathematics class periods and out-of-school study hours in PISA 2012 had partial effects on most items with meaningful DIF effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., & Maloney, E. A. (2015). Math anxiety A factor in math achievement not to be ignored. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). A cross-national comparison study on the accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs of middle-school mathematics students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., Shao, C., & Lathrop, Q. N. (2016). The mediated MIMIC model for understanding the underlying mechanism of DIF. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, S. F., Krantz, D. H., & Silver, R. (1992). Mathematics anxiety and science careers among able college women. Psychological Science, 3(5), 292–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. R., Kawachi, I., Maller, S. J., & Berkman, L. F. (2000). Test of item-response bias in the CES-D scale: Experience from the New Haven EPESE study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(3), 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Chen, S., & Pallesen, S. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2013). Testing for measurement equivalence in surveys dimensions of social trust across cultural contexts. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(S1), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganotice, F. A., Bernardo, A. B., & King, R. B. (2012). Testing the factorial invariance of the English and Filipino versions of the inventory of school motivation with bilingual students in the Philippines. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(3), 298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberty, T. J. (2012). Anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: Assessment, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. S., & Yoon, M. (2011). Testing measurement invariance: A comparison of multiple-group categorical CFA and IRT. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(2), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koomen, H. M., Verschueren, K., van Schooten, E., Jak, S., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Validating the student–teacher relationship scale: Testing factor structure and measurement invariance across child gender and age in a Dutch sample. Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, X., Kidwai, H., & Zhang, M. (2016). How Shanghai does it: Insights and lessons from the highest-ranking education system in the world. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Johri, A. (2020). Correlates of social media fatigue and academic performance decrement. Information technology and people. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2019-0289.

  • Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abu-Hilal, M. M., Morin, A. J., Abdelfattah, F., Leung, K. C., et al. (2013). Factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of Arab and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 108–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. PISA: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn—students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). PISA: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 technical report. PISA: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014b). Results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. PISA: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, R. D. (2010). Explaining crossing DIF in polytomous items using differential step functioning effects. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(8), 563–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, R. C., Ge, B., Dong, B., & Swinney, J. L. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in cross-cultural research: Assessing measurement invariance in the construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 819–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seetee, N., Chi, C., Dhir, A., & Chen, S. (2020). Validation of the science, mathematics, and English task value scales based on longitudinal data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10081-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., & Shih, C. (2010). MIMIC methods for assessing differential item functioning in polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(3), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. L. (2004). Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, C. M. (2009a). Empirical selection of anchors for tests of differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, C. M. (2009b). Evaluation of MIMIC-model methods for DIF testing with comparison to two-group analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, C. M., & Grimm, K. J. (2011). Testing for nonuniform differential item functioning with multiple indicator multiple cause models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(5), 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, A. (2012). The relationship between self-concept and achievement in TIMSS 2007: A comparison between American and Japanese students. International Review of Education, 58(2), 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Wang, D. (2016). A Chinese approach to learning? A comparative study on time use patterns of 15-year-old students in PISA 2012. In Chinese education models in a global age (pp. 105–119). Singapore: Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi Zhu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, S., Meyer, P. A Comparative Study of Mathematics Self-Beliefs between Students in Shanghai-China and the USA. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 31, 81–91 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00540-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00540-y

Keywords

Navigation