Abstract
Vocabulary acquisition is a central component of second language learning. While there have been advancements in our understanding of the factors contributing to vocabulary acquisition in L2 students, it is still unclear how language aptitude is associated with the effects of task involvement load in this process. This study investigates the effects of task involvement load on incidental vocabulary learning and their association with language aptitude. One hundred and forty-four participants were assigned to five groups. All groups finished reading a passage and completed tasks that had different involvement loads. A pretest and two posttests adapted from Paribakht and Wesche’s (TESOL Can J 11:9–29, 1993) Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS) were employed to assess learners’ development of the target vocabulary items. The LLAMA test (Meara, in: In_lognostics, Retrieved from February 14, 2017, from https://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama, 2005) was administered to measure participants’ language aptitude. We found that, in the immediate posttest, the Gap-fill (with search) group showed superiority over the Reading (no need) and Reading (with need) groups, while the Sentence-writing group significantly outperformed the other four groups. In the delayed posttest, both the Gap-fill (with search) group and the Sentence-writing group significantly outperformed the other three groups. Our study also reveals a moderate correlation between language aptitude and vocabulary learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It can be referred to at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesh-Kincaid_readability_tests.
These words were examined via https://www4.caes.hku.hk/vocabulary/profile.htm.
References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (2002). Modern language aptitude test manual. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing Inc.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.
Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Huang, S., Eslami, Z., & Wilson, V. (2012). The effects of task involvement load on L2 incidental vocabulary learning: A mete-analytic study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 544–557.
Huang, Y. (2004). An empirical study on the Task Involvement Load Hypothesis: Effects of reading tasks on Chinese students’ vocabulary acquisition. Modern Foreign Languages, 27(4), 386–394.
Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, B., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 327–339.
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–588.
Joe, A. (1995). Text-based tasks and incidental vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 11, 149–158.
Joe, A. (1998). What effects do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 19, 357–377.
Keating, G. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 365–386.
Kim, Y. (2011). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 100–140.
Laufer, B. (2000). Electronic dictionaries and incidental vocabulary acquisition: Does technology make a difference? In U. Heid, S. Evert, E. Lehmann, & C. Rohrer (Eds.), EURALEX (pp. 849–854). Stuttgart: Stuttgart University Press.
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary in reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567–587.
Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 223–250.
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.
Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analysis review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 385–408.
Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 801–842.
Meara, P. (2005). Llama language aptitude tests. In_lognostics. Retrieved from February 14, 2017, from https://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52(2), 439–482.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1993). The relationship between reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESOL Canada Journal, 11, 9–29.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rational for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Qin, X., & Bi, J. (2015). Quantitative approaches and quantitative data analysis in L2 research. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17(5), 888–896.
Rott, S. (2005). Processing glosses: A qualitative exploration of how form-meaning connections are established and strengthened. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 95–124.
Sarbazi, M. (2014). Involvement Load Hypothesis: Recalling unfamiliar words meaning by adults across genders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1686–1692.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language acquisition. London: Edward Anold.
Soleimani, H., & Rahmanian, M. (2015). Vocabulary Acquisition and Task Effectiveness in Involvement Load Hypothesis: A case in Iran. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(5), 198–205.
Wei, M., & Wang, L. (2011). Effects of task type on university students’ acquisition of idiomatic expressions: Reexamining the Task Involvement Load Hypothesis. Modern Foreign Languages, 34(4), 372–380.
Wu, Y., Liu, R., & Jeffrey, P. (1993). Reports on Chinese undergraduate students’ English learning ability. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 36–46.
Xie, H., Zou, D., Wang, F., & Wong, T. (2017). A review on recent development of the Involvement Load Hypothesis. In International conference on blended Learning ICBL 2017: Blended learning. New challenges and innovative practices (pp. 447–452). Cham: Springer.
Yalcin, S. (2012). Individual differences and the learning of two grammatical features with Turkish learners of English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Toronto.
Yang, Y., Shintani, N., Li, S., & Zhang, Y. (2017). The effectiveness of post-reading word-focused activities and their association with working memory. System, 70, 38–49.
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). The role of working memory capacity and language analytical ability in the effectiveness of explicit correction and recasts. Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 344–368.
Zou, D. (2018). Vocabulary acquisition through cloze exercises, and composition-writing: Extending the evaluation component of the involvement load hypothesis. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 54–75.
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by the Ministry of Education in China (MOE) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research [grant No. 20YJA740052]. The authors would like to thank Dr. Alex Sheftel for proofreading the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Cao, X. Effects of Task Involvement Load on L2 Vocabulary Acquisition and Their Association with Language Aptitude. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 30, 421–430 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00528-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00528-8