Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Secondary School Students’ Epistemic Beliefs and Fallacy Identification

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals hold different epistemic beliefs at different ages, and these beliefs can affect a wide range of reasoning tasks. The present study examined Chinese secondary school students’ epistemic beliefs at different grade levels, and how these related to the students’ abilities to identify various forms of fallacy with the use of a cross-sectional design. One hundred and forty-six Chinese secondary school students (Grade 7 N = 32, Grade 9 N = 40, Grade 10 N = 36, and Grade 11 N = 38) completed a 14-item Epistemic Beliefs Questionnaire and a set of fallacy tasks. CFA showed that the questionnaire measured the four dimensions of the secondary school student samples adequately. A non-linear trend of epistemic beliefs across different grades was found and analyses using MANOVA showed significant grade differences in the dimension of Certainty (Grade 7 vs. 10 vs. 11). χ 2 tests showed only significant grade difference in the fallacy of Appeal to Authority (Grade 7 vs Grade 9; Grade 7 vs. 10). Finally, only grade, but not epistemic beliefs, predicted fallacy identification (Appeal to Authority) when all variables were considered in the ordinal logistic regression model. The issue of epistemic dimensions change and students’ informal reasoning ability are discussed in light of the Chinese culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS: Structural questions program. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445–455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. (2002). Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemic beliefs: Cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, N. M., Ho, I. T., & Ku, K. Y. L. (2010). Epistemic beliefs and critical thinking of Chinese students. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, M. J., & Proulx, T. (2010). Stalking young person’s changing beliefs about beliefs. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research and implications for practices (pp. 197–220). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Y. L. (1948). The short history of Chinese philosophy. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). An introduction to epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., Torney-Purta, J., & Azevedo, R. (2010). Empirical evidence regarding relations among a model of epistemic and ontological cognition, academic performance, and educational level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 234–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J. (2009). A cognitive psychology of mass communication (5th ed.). Routledge: New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemological research: Implications for learning and instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2010). Personal epistemology in asia: Burgeoning research and future directions. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2012). Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. In H. Karen, S. Graham, T. Urdam, & C. B. McCormick (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Theories, constructs and critical issues (1st ed., pp. 227–256). Washington, DC, US: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khine, M. W. (2008). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse culture. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. W. S., & Chan, C. K. K. (2015). Identifying and examining epistemic beliefs among college students. Asian Pacific Educational Researcher, 24(4), 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Arisasi, N., & Boldrin, A. (2011). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21, 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Y., Glassner, A., & Weinstock, M. (2004). The effect of a reason’s truth-value on the judgment of a fallacious argument. Acta Psychologica, 116(2), 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977–1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 551–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M., & Easter, M. (2008). Epistemological beliefs’ contributions to study strategies of Asian American and European Americans. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 920–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromso, H. T., Braten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 513–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N. (1989). Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, M. P., & Cronin, M. A. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror reasoning skills. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, M. P., Neuman, Y., & Glassner, A. (2006). Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level and cognitive ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, M. P., Neuman, Y., & Tabak, I. (2004). Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. Y., Wong, W. Y., & Wong, E. W. Y. (2012). What do Chinese value in (mathematic) education? ZDM The International Journal of Mathematic Education, 44(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). An epistemic framework for scientific reasoning in informal context. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research and implications for practices (pp. 124–163). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yuon, I. (2000). The cultural specificity of epistemological beliefs about learning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Faculty Research Fund (2012–2013), Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong. The author would like to thank Ms. Y.C. Sin for coordinating data collection in the secondary school, Dr. Iris Feng for back-translation, and Prof. N.Y. Wong for comments provided for the earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR

    Wincy W. S. Lee

  2. Hong Kong Community College, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    Victor C. W. Chan

Authors
  1. Wincy W. S. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victor C. W. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wincy W. S. Lee.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, W.W.S., Chan, V.C.W. Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Secondary School Students’ Epistemic Beliefs and Fallacy Identification. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 26, 11–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0322-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0322-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation