Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring Workload in Throwing-Dominant Sports: A Systematic Review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The ability to monitor training load accurately in professional sports is proving vital for athlete preparedness and injury prevention. While numerous monitoring techniques have been developed to assess the running demands of many team sports, these methods are not well suited to throwing-dominant sports that are infrequently linked to high running volumes. Therefore, other techniques are required to monitor the differing demands of these sports to ensure athletes are adequately prepared for competition.

Objective

To investigate the different methodologies used to quantitatively monitor training load in throwing-dominant sports.

Methods

A systematic review of the methods used to monitor training load in throwing-dominant sports was conducted using variations of terms that described different load-monitoring techniques and different sports. Studies included in this review were published prior to June 2015 and were identified through a systematic search of four electronic databases including Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Medline and SPORTDiscus. Only full-length peer-reviewed articles investigating workload monitoring in throwing-dominant sports were selected for review.

Results

A total of 8098 studies were initially retrieved from the four databases and 7334 results were removed as they were either duplicates, review articles, non-peer-reviewed articles, conference abstracts or articles written in languages other than English. After screening the titles and abstracts of the remaining papers, 28 full-text papers were reviewed, resulting in the identification of 20 articles meeting the inclusion criteria for monitoring workloads in throwing-dominant sports. Reference lists of selected articles were then scanned to identify other potential articles, which yielded one additional article. Ten articles investigated workload monitoring in cricket, while baseball provided eight results, and handball, softball and water polo each contributed one article. Results demonstrated varying techniques used to monitor workload and purposes for monitoring workload, encompassing the relationship between workload and injury, individual responses to workloads, the effect of workload on subsequent performance and the future directions of workload-monitoring techniques.

Conclusion

This systematic review highlighted a number of simple and effective workload-monitoring techniques implemented across a variety of throwing-dominant sports. The current literature placed an emphasis on the relationship between workload and injury. However, due to differences in chronological and training age, inconsistent injury definitions and time frames used for monitoring, injury thresholds remain unclear in throwing-dominant sports. Furthermore, although research has examined total workload, the intensity of workload is often neglected. Additional research on the reliability of self-reported workload data is also required to validate existing relationships between workload and injury. Considering the existing disparity within the literature, it is likely that throwing-dominant sports would benefit from the development of an automated monitoring tool to objectively assess throwing-related workloads in conjunction with well-established internal measures of load in athletes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabbett TJ, Ullah S. Relationship between running loads and soft-tissue injury in elite team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(4):953–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rogalski B, Dawson B, Heasman J, et al. Training and game loads and injury risk in elite Australian Footballers. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(6):499–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabbett TJ, Whyte DG, Hartwig TB, et al. The relationship between workloads, physical performance, injury and illness in adolescent male football players. Sports Med. 2014;44(7):989–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart AM, Hopkins WG. Seasonal training and performance of competitive swimmers. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(11):873–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Foster C, Daines E, Hector L, et al. Athletic performance in relation to training load. Wisc Med J. 1996;95(6):370–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabbett TJ. Reductions in pre-season training loads reduce training injury rates in rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(6):743–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Foster C. Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(7):1164–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788.

  9. Edgecomb S, Norton KI. Comparison of global positioning and computer-based tracking systems for measuring player movement distance during Australian Football. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(1):25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coutts AJ, Quinn J, Hocking J, et al. Match running performance in elite Australian Rules Football. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(5):543–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spencer M, Lawrence S, Rechichi C, et al. Time–motion analysis of elite field hockey, with special reference to repeated-sprint activity. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(9):843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varley MC, Fairweather IH, Aughey RJ. Validity and reliability of GPS for measuring instantaneous velocity during acceleration, deceleration, and constant motion. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(2):121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cummins C, Orr R, O’Connor H, et al. Global positioning systems (GPS) and microtechnology sensors in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013;43(10):1025–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piggott B, Newton MJ, McGuigan MR. The relationship between training load and incidence of injury and illness over a pre-season at an Australian Football League Club. J Aust Strength Cond. 2009;17(3):4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Colby MJ, Dawson B, Heasman J, et al. Accelerometer and GPS-derived running loads and injury risk in elite Australian footballers. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(8):2244–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gamble P. Reducing injury in elite sport—is simply restricting workloads really the answer? N Z J Sports Med. 2013;40(1):36–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borresen J, Lambert MI. The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect on performance. Sports Med. 2009;39(9):779–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heisterberg MF, Fahrenkrug J, Krustrup P, et al. Extensive monitoring through multiple blood samples in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(5):1260–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buchheit M, Racinais S, Bilsborough J, et al. Monitoring fitness, fatigue and running performance during a pre-season training camp in elite football players. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(6):550–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raglin JS. Psychological factors in sport performance. Sports Med. 2001;31(12):875–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meeusen R, Duclos M, Gleeson M, et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the overtraining syndrome. Eur J Sport Sci. 2006;6(01):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Urhausen A, Kindermann W. Diagnosis of overtraining. Sports Med. 2002;32(2):95–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gastin PB, Meyer D, Robinson D. Perceptions of wellness to monitor adaptive responses to training and competition in elite Australian football. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(9):2518–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Killen NM, Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG. Training loads and incidence of injury during the preseason in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(8):2079–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brughelli M, Cronin J, Leven G, et al. Understanding change of direction ability in sport: a review of resistance training studies. Sports Med. 2008;38(12):1045–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McMaster DT, Gill N, Cronin J, et al. The development, retention and decay rates of strength and power in elite rugby union, rugby league and American football. Sports Med. 2013;43(5):367–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dennis RJ, Finch CF, Farhart PJ. Is bowling workload a risk factor for injury to Australian junior cricket fast bowlers? Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(11):843–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dennis R, Farhart P, Clements M, et al. The relationship between fast bowling workload and injury in first-class cricketers: a pilot study. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(2):232–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dennis R, Farhart R, Goumas C, et al. Bowling workload and the risk of injury in elite cricket fast bowlers. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6(3):359–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saw R, Dennis RJ, Bentley D, et al. Throwing workload and injury risk in elite cricketers. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(10):805–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Orchard JW, James T, Portus M, et al. Fast bowlers in cricket demonstrate up to 3- to 4-week delay between high workloads and increased risk of injury. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(6):1186–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, et al. Fast bowling match workloads over 5–26 days and risk of injury in the following month. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(1):26–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Orchard JW, Blanch P, Paoloni J, et al. Cricket fast bowling workload patterns as risk factors for tendon, muscle, bone and joint injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2015. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093683.

  34. Hulin BT, Gabbett TJ, Blanch P, et al. Spikes in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(8):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Naughton GA, et al. Training and competition workloads and fatigue responses of elite junior cricket players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(5):517–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Karakolis T, Bhan S, Crotin RL. Injuries to young professional baseball pitchers cannot be prevented solely by restricting number of innings pitched. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/sports-med-physical-fitness/.

  37. Karakolis T, Bhan S, Crotin RL. An inferential and descriptive statistical examination of the relationship between cumulative work metrics and injury in Major League Baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(8):2113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lyman S, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, et al. Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):463–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lyman S, Fleisig GS, Waterbor JW, et al. Longitudinal study of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2001;33(11):1803–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bushnell BD, Anz AW, Noonan TJ, et al. Association of maximum pitch velocity and elbow injury in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(4):728–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Olsen SJ II, Fleisig GS, Dun S, et al. Risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in adolescent baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(6):905–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bradbury JC, Forman SL. The impact of pitch counts and days of rest on performance among major-league baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(5):1181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Crotin RL, Bhan S, Karakolis T, et al. Fastball velocity trends in short-season minor league baseball. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(8):2206–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bresciani G, Cuevas MJ, Garatachea N, et al. Monitoring biological and psychological measures throughout an entire season in male handball players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2010;10(6):377–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shanley E, Michener LA, Ellenbecker TS, et al. Shoulder range of motion, pitch count, and injuries among interscholastic female softball pitchers: a descriptive study. Int J Sport Phys Ther. 2012;7(5):548–57.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lupo C, Capranica L, Tessitore A. The validity of the session-RPE method for quantifying training load in water polo. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(4):656–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Chapman P, et al. The validity of microsensors to automatically detect bowling events and counts in cricket fast bowlers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(1):71–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Andrews JR, Fleisig GS. Preventing throwing injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(3):187–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia M. Black.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest

Georgia Black, Tim Gabbett, Michael Cole and Geraldine Naughton declare they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the context of this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Black, G.M., Gabbett, T.J., Cole, M.H. et al. Monitoring Workload in Throwing-Dominant Sports: A Systematic Review. Sports Med 46, 1503–1516 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0529-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0529-6

Keywords

Navigation