Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus among fishermen in Cape Coast: a comparison between the FINDRISC score and the metabolic syndrome

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies over the past decades have observed a sharp rise in the prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A highly sensitive and specific predictive tool for risky populations is essential. This study assessed two significant diabetes mellitus predictive tools for effectiveness and accuracy among people living in fishing communities in Cape Coast, Ghana.

Method

In April 2019, we recruited one hundred and thirty-five (135) fishermen from three fishing communities in Cape Coast in the Central Region of Ghana. Each participant underwent a standard metabolic procedure including clinical examination as well as taking of anthropometric variables such as weight, height, waist and hip circumference were also measured. The FINDRISC questionnaire was used to gather data from the respective participants. Serum glucose and lipids were estimated with enzymatic techniques, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) screened with the international diabetes federation (IDF) criteria.

Results

Of the 135 participants, 71 (52.6%) were women. The average age of study participants was 52 ± 16 years with females averagely older (56.6 ± 15.0) than the males (47.3 ± 15.0). This study recorded 31.1% and 8.9% prediabetic and diabetic fishermen respectively. Frequency of both prediabetes and diabetes was significantly predominant among females (71.4% vs 83.3%) than males (26.2% vs 25.0%) (p < 0.001) respectively. Prevalence of MetS according to the IDF criteria was 18.5%, significantly higher among females (92.0%) than recorded among the males (18.5%). The discriminatory accuracy of FINDRISC [aROC = 0.76 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.83); sensitivity = 58.3% and specificity = 86.9%; p = 0.003; optimal cut-off point = 13.50] and the MetS [aROC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81); sensitivity = 75.0% and specificity = 71.5%; p = 0.002] despite demonstrating a significantly good capacity to detect T2DM were statistically comparable [aROC = 0.018 (95% CI -0.152 to 0.189); p = 0.834] in our study.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that both FINDRISC (with a suitable cut-off value of 13.5) and MetS screening tools possess a good predictive capacity for the detection of T2DM. Additionally, FINDRISC can be employed to detect MetS in a high-risk population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tuei V, Maiyoh G, Ha C-E. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in sub-Saharan Africa. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2010;26:433–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Phaswana-Mafuya N et al. (2011) Epidemiology of chronic non-communicable diseases in low and middle income countries - a review. Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in Developing Countries, p. 1–38

  3. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silvestre M, et al. Evaluating FINDRISC as a screening tool for type 2 diabetes among overweight adults in the PREVIEW:NZ cohort. Primary Care Diabetes. 2017;11:561–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng Y, Ley S, Hu F (2017) Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 14

  6. Meijnikman AS, de Block CEM, Verrijken A, Mertens I, van Gaal LF. Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparison between the FINDRISC score and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2018;10(1):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Unwin N, Shaw J, Zimmet P, Alberti KG. Abstract. Diabet Med. 2002;19(9):708–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mutalik AV, Bhosale SB, Pawar AT. Risk assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus among fisherman community in Beypore area of Kozhikode. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2017;4(9):3196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma SK, Ghimire A, Radhakrishnan J, Thapa L, Shrestha NR, Paudel N, et al. Prevalence of hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome in Nepal. Int J Hypertens. 2011;2011:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ofori-Asenso R, Agyeman AA, Laar A. Metabolic syndrome in apparently “healthy” Ghanaian adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of chronic diseases. 2017;2017:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saleem SM, Khan SMS, Jan SS (2017) Finnish diabetic risk score: a tool for predicting risk of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research

  12. Janghorbani M, Adineh H, Amini M. Evaluation of the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) as a screening tool for the metabolic syndrome. The review of diabetic studies: RDS. 2013;10(4):283–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365(9468):1415–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghana Statistical Service (2010) Population and housing census, District Analytical Report, Abura-Asebu-Kwamankese District, p. 67

  15. Pereko KK, Setorglo J, Owusu WB, Tiweh JM, Achampong EK. Overnutrition and associated factors among adults aged 20 years and above in fishing communities in the urban Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(4):591–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adotey J et al. (2015) Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Beach Elevations for Monitoring Coastal Erosion for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Ola Beach in Cape Coast, Ghana. in Third joint UCC-UNILORIN international conference at the University of Cape Coast (Accepted)

  17. Checkmarket. Sample Size Calculator. 2020; Available from: https://www.checkmarket.com/sample-size-calculator/.

  18. Blomster JI, Zoungas S, Chalmers J, Li Q, Chow CK, Woodward M, et al. The relationship between alcohol consumption and vascular complications and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1353–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang SA. Smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes & metabolism journal. 2012;36(6):399–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kow Nanse Arthur F, et al. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its predominant components among pre-and postmenopausal Ghanaian women. BMC Research Notes. 2013;6(1):446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knopfholz J, Disserol CCD, Pierin AJ, Schirr FL, Streisky L, Takito LL, et al. Validation of the friedewald formula in patients with metabolic syndrome. Cholesterol. 2014;2014:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alberti KGMM, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome—a new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the international diabetes federation. Diabet Med. 2006;23(5):469–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Salinero M, et al. Performance of the Finnish diabetes risk score and a simplified Finnish diabetes risk score in a community-based, cross-sectional Programme for screening of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and Dysglycaemia in Madrid, Spain: the SPREDIA-2 study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the participants of the three fishing communities understudied, and the entire laboratory staff of the Departments of Laboratory Technology, University of Cape Coast, for their technical support.

Funding

This study was funded entirely by the research team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RKDE, VOB, JA and AM conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. RKDE, VOB, JA and AM were involved in the recruitment of participants, data collection and analysis. RKDE, AAY, GEK and PKK drafted the manuscript. RKDE, AAY and PKK provided analytic and statistical support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Abaka-Yawson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ephraim, R.K.D., Owusu, V.B., Asiamah, J. et al. Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus among fishermen in Cape Coast: a comparison between the FINDRISC score and the metabolic syndrome. J Diabetes Metab Disord 19, 1317–1324 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00650-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00650-w

Keywords

Navigation