Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Changing Role of the Genetic Counsellor in the Genomics Era

  • Cancer Genomics (K Snape and H Hanson, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Genetic Medicine Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Rapid advances in the scope, affordability and clinical utility of genetic testing have driven significant change and expansion of the genetic counselling profession. Increasing volume, complexity and diversity of patients and their genomic data present a challenge. To manage this, examination of how genetic counsellors can adapt and thrive in the genomics era is warranted.

Recent Findings

Digital applications, web-based educational platforms and artificial intelligence are being harnessed to support and enhance genetic counselling delivery for patients and consumers. Genetic counsellors are also ideally placed to educate and support other healthcare professionals delivering genomic medicine. Concurrently, core genetic counselling skills in managing psychosocial, familial and ethical issues have continued relevance, and further investment in evidence-based research is needed to guide practice. A focus on improving diversity and equity of access to genetic counselling is also necessary.

Summary

Working in a changing and uncertain environment is not unfamiliar ground for genetic counsellors. Their specialist knowledge and core skills will continue to be highly valued in the genomics era. Genomic medicine has the potential to positively transform public health, and the genetic counselling profession has the opportunity to play a pivotal role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. • Resta R, Biesecker BB, Bennett RL, Blum S, Estabrooks Hahn S, Strecker MN, et al. A new definition of genetic counselling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. J Genet Couns. 2006;15:77–83 Describes the adopted definition of genetic counselling.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baty BJ. Genetic counselling: growth of the profession and the professional. Am J Med Genet. 2018;178C:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Middleton A, Hall G, Patch C. Genetic counselors and genomic counseling in the United Kingdom. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014;3:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.123.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ormond K, Laurino M, Barlow-Stewart K, Wessels TM, Macaulay S, Austin J, et al. Genetic counseling globally: where are we now? Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31607.

  5. Skirton H, Kerzin-Storrar L, Barnes C, Hall G, Longmuir M, Patch C, et al. Building the genetic counsellor profession in the United Kingdom: two decades of growth and development. J Genet Couns. 2013;22(6):902–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies SC. Annual report of the chief medical officer 2016, generation genome. London: Department of Health; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turnbull C, Scott RH, Thomas E, Jones L, Murugaesu N, Boardman Pretty F, et al. The 100 000 Genomes Project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ. 2018;361:k1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brice P. (2019) http://www.phgfoundation.org/blog/proposals-for-paid-nhs-genome-service [Accessed 22/03/2019].

  9. Commons Select Committee (https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/news-parliament-2017/commercial-genomics-inquiry-launch-17-19/) [Accessed 25/03/2019].

  10. Stark Z, Tan TY, Chong B, Brett GR, Yap P, Walsh M, et al. A prospective evaluation of whole-exome sequencing as a first-tier molecular test in infants with suspected monogenic disorders. Genet Med. 2016;18(11):1090–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hooker GW, Ormond KE, Sweet K, Biesecker BB. Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era. J Genet Couns. 2014;23:445–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson GE, Wolf SM, Kuczynski KJ, Joffe S, Sharp RR, Parsons DW, et al. The challenge of informed consent and return of results in translational genomics: empirical analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2014;42(3):344–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. • Sanderson SC, Lewis C, Patch C, Hill M, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Chitty LS. Opening the “black box” of informed consent appointments for genome sequencing: a multisite observational study. Genet Med. 2018;1 Studying the changing nature of consent for genomic sequencing.

  14. • George A, Riddell D, Seal S, Talukdar S, Mahamdallie S, Ruark E, et al. Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2016;13(6):29506. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29506 Early adopter of mainstream genetic testing in cancer.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kentwell M, Dow E, Antill Y, Wrede CD, McNally O, Higgs E, et al. Mainstreaming cancer genetics: a model integrating germline BRCA testing into routine ovarian cancer clinics. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145(1):130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. • Ayres S, Gallacher L, Stark Z, Brett GR. Genetic counseling in pediatric acute care: reflections on ultra-rapid genomic diagnoses in neonates. J Genet Couns. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1086 Exemplar of rapid exome testing with multidisciplinary team working in the neonatal setting.

  17. Reuter C, et al. Clinical cardiovascular genetic counselors take a leading role in team-based variant classification. J Genet Couns. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0175-7.

  18. • Grove ME, White S, Fisk DG, Rego S, Dagan-Rosenfeld O, Kohler JN, et al. Developing a genomics rotation: practical training around variant interpretation for genetic counseling students. J Genet Couns. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1094 Incorporation of variant interpretation training for genetic counsellors.

  19. Ormond KE, Rashkin M, Faucett WA. Standardizing variant interpretation in genomic sequencing: implications for genetic counselling practice. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2015;3:137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swanson A, Ramos E, Snyder H. Next generation sequencing is the impetus for the next generation of laboratory-based genetic counselors. J Genet Couns. 2014;23:647–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9684-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McWalter K, Cho MT, Hart T, Nusbaum R, Sebold C, Knapke S, et al. Genetic counseling in industry settings: opportunities in the era of precision health. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178C:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramos E, Weissman SM. The dawn of consumer-directed testing. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178C:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Riconda D, Grubs RE, Campion MAW, Cragun D. Genetic counselor training for the next generation: where do we go from here? Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178C:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. • The Topol review (2019) Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future. An independent report on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/HEE-Topol-Review-2019.pdf [Accessed 23/02/2019] Report with recommendations on future care in the NHS with a focus on digital innovation and genomics.

  25. British Medical Association (2017) Exploring the cost effectiveness of early intervention and prevention. [Accessed 07/03/2019].

  26. Howell KB, Eggers S, Dalziel K, Riseley J, Mandelstam S, Myers CT, et al. A population-based cost-effectiveness study of early genetic testing in severe epilepsies of infancy. Epilepsia. 2018;59(6):1177–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.14087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Masters R, Anwar E, Collins B, et al. Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017:1–8.

  28. • Mvundura M, Grosse SD, Hampel H, Palomaki GE. The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med. 2010;12:93–104 Genetics-specific example of cost-effective mainstream universal testing in colorectal cancer.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. • Gordon E, Babu D, Laney D. The future is now: technology’s impact on the practice of genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet C: Semin Med Genet. 2018;178 Review of the positive impact of technology on genetic counselling practice and opportunities for the future.

  30. Welch BM, Wiley K, Pflieger L, Achiangia R, Baker K, Hughes-Halbert C, et al. Review and comparison of electronic patient-facing family health history tools. J Genet Couns. 2018;27:381–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0235-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. • Bucheit L, Johansen T, Ready K. Validation of a digital identification tool for individuals at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019;17:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-018-0099-8 Validation of a digital tool compared with genetic counsellor assessment of eligibility for genetic testing.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Thorogood A, Toure SB, Ordish J, Hall A, Knoppers B. Genetic database software as medical devices. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1702–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.23621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas SN, Hovick SR, Tan N, Sturm AC, Sweet K. How online family history tool design and message content impact user perceptions: an examination of Family Health Link. Public Health Genomics. 2018;21:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Silverman RB, Kuperman GJ, Vanegas A, Sin M, Dimond J, Crew KD, et al. An applied framework in support of shared decision making about BRCA genetic testing. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018:961–9.

  35. Elliott AM, Mhanni AA, Marles SL, Greenberg CR, Chudley AE, Nyhof GC, et al. Trends in telehealth versus on-site clinical genetics appointments in Manitoba: a comparative study. J Genet Couns. 2012;21(2):337–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hilgart JS, Hayward JA, Coles B, Iredale R. Telegenetics: a systematic review of telemedicine in genetics services. Genet Med. 2012;14(9):765–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zilliacus E, Meiser B, Lobb E, Dudding TE, Barlow-Stewart K, Tucker K. The virtual consultation: practitioners’ experiences of genetic counseling by videoconferencing in Australia. Telemedi e-Health. 2010a;16(3):350–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Abrams DJ, Geier MR. A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2006;15(3):199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Beretich L, DeLuca J, Eggert J. Psychosocial implications of prenatal telehealth genetic counselling: a systematic review. J Int Soc Telemed eHealth. 2018;6:e21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zilliacus EM, Meiser B, Lobb EA, Kirk J, Warwick L, Tucker K. Women’s experience of telehealth cancer genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2010b;19(5):463–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Voils CI, Venne VL, Weidenbacher H, Sperber N, Datta S. Comparison of telephone and televideo modes for delivery of genetic counseling: a randomized trial. J Genet Couns. 2018;27(2):339–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lea DH, Johnson JL, Ellingwood S, Allan W, Patel A, Smith R. Telegenetics in Maine: successful clinical and educational service delivery model developed from a 3-year pilot project. Genet Med. 2005;7:21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zierhut HA, MacFarlane IM, Ahmed Z, Davies J. Genetic counselors’ experiences and interest in telegenetics and remote counseling. J Genet Couns. 2018;27(2):329–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Terry AB, Wylie A, Raspa M, Vogel B, Sanghavi K, Djurdjinovic L, et al. Clinical models of telehealth in genetics: a regional telegenetics landscape. J Genet Couns. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1088.

  45. Reyna VF. A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. Med Decis Mak. 2008;28(6):850–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. • Reyna VF. A new intuitionism: meaning, memory, and development in fuzzy-trace theory. Judgm Decis Mak. 2012;7(3):332–59 Applying fuzzy trace theory to decision-making around risk.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. • Biesecker B, et al. Theories for psychotherapeutic genetic counseling: fuzzy trace theory and cognitive behavior theory. J Genet Couns. 2017;26:322–30 Use of psychotherapeutic techniques in genetic counselling.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. • Schmidlen T, et al. Operationalizing the reciprocal engagement model of genetic counseling practice: a framework for the scalable delivery of genomic counseling and testing. J Genet Couns. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0230-z Developing tailored visual aids for patients underpinned by counselling theory and qualitative research.

  49. Grimmett C, Brooks C, Recio-Saucedo A, Armstrong A, Cutress RI, Evans DG, et al. Development of breast cancer choices: a decision support tool for young women with breast cancer deciding whether to have genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:297–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4307-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Adam S, Birch PH, Coe RR, Bansback N, Jones AL, Connolly MB, et al. Assessing an interactive online tool to support parents’ genomic testing decisions. J Genet Couns. 2018;28:273–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Reumkens K, Tummers MHE, Gietal-Habets JJG, van Kuijk SMJ, Aalfs CM, Asperen CJ, et al. Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision-making. J Genet Couns. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1056.

  52. Maio M, Carrion P, Yaremco E, Austin JC. Awareness of genetic counseling and perceptions of its purpose: a survey of the Canadian public. J Genet Couns. 2013;22:762–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kenen RH, Smith AC. Genetic counseling for the next 25 years: models for the future. J Genet Couns. 1995;4(2):115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hartmann JE, Veach PM, MacFarlane IM, LeRoy BS. Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. J Genet Couns. 2015;24(2):225–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Meiser B, Irle J, Lobb E, Barlow-Stewart K. Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. J Genet Couns. 2008;17(5):434–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Paul J, Metcalfe S, Stirling L, Wilson B, Hodgson J. Analyzing communication in genetic consultations—a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(1):15–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wynn J. Genomic testing: a genetic counselor’s personal reflection on three years of consenting and testing. J Genet Couns. 2016;25(4):691–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Skirton H. More than an information service: are counselling skills needed by genetics professionals in the genomic era? Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;1.

  59. Merrill SL, Guthrie KJ. Is it time for genomic counseling? Retrofitting genetic counseling for the era of genomic medicine. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2015;3(2):57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Weil J. Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. J Genet Couns. 2003;12(3):199–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hunt LM, de Voogd KB, Castañeda H. The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making? Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56(3):302–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tabor HK, Stock J, Brazg T, McMillin MJ, Dent KM, Yu JH, et al. Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2012;158(6):1310–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. • Austin, et al. Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine. J Genet Couns. 2014;23(6):903–9 Conceptualises and expands on the view that genetic counselling is a highly circumscribed form of psychotherapy in which communication of genetic information is the therapeutic goal.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Ellington L, Kelly KM, Reblin M, Latimer S, Roter D. Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing. Health Commun. 2011;26:667–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Redlinger-Grosse K. A different vantage point: commentary on “Theories for psychotherapeutic genetic counseling: fuzzy trace theory and cognitive behavior theory”. J Genet Couns. 2017;26:331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0024-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Barlow-Stewart K. The certainty of uncertainty in genomic medicine: managing the challenge. J Health Commun. 2018;3(3):37.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Arribas-Ayllon MS, Srikant. Counselling uncertainty: genetics professionals’ accounts of (non) directiveness and trust/distrust. Health Risk Soc. 2014;16:171–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Broley S. Acceptance and commitment therapy in genetic counselling: a case study of recurrent worry. J Genet Couns. 2013;22(3):296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. • Newson AJ, Leonard SJ, Hall A, Gaff CL. Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine. BMC Med Genet. 2016;9(1):57 Explores the inherent uncertainty in genomic medicine and drafts a conceptual and ethical response to handling genomic uncertainty.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dean M, Davidson LG. Previvors’ uncertainty management strategies for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Health Commun. 2018;33:122–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen A. ‘Is this knowledge mine and nobody else’s? I don’t feel that.’ Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine. J Med Ethics. 2018;42:174–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Richards M. How distinctive is genetic information? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2001;32(4):663–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Schwiter R, Rahm AK, Williams JL, Sturm AC. How can we reach at-risk relatives? Efforts to enhance communication and cascade testing uptake: a mini-review. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2018;6(2):21–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Seymour KC, Addington-Hall J, Lucassen AM, Foster CL. What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. J Genet Couns. 2010;19(4):330–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. • Athens BA, Caldwell S, Umstead KL, Connors PD, Brenna E, Biesecker BB. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess outcomes of genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(5):902–33 Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of genetic counselling from 1990 to 2015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Biesecker BB, Lewis KL, Umstead KL, Johnston JJ, Turbitt E, Fishler KP, et al. Web platform vs in-person genetic counselor for return of carrier results from exome sequencing: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(3):338–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Wicklund C, Trepanier A. Adapting genetic counseling training to the genomic era: more an evolution than a revolution. J Genet Couns. 2014;23(4):452–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hooker GW, Babu D, Myers MF, Zierhut H, McAllister M. Standards for the reporting of genetic counseling interventions in research and other studies (GCIRS): an NSGC task force report. J Genet Couns. 2017;26:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Mittman IS, Downs K. Diversity in genetic counseling: past, present and future. J Genet Couns. 2008;17(4):301–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Mittman IS, Sullivan LW. Forming state collaborations to diversify the nation’s health workforce: the experience of the Sullivan Alliance to transform the health professions. J Genet Couns. 2011;20:547–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9402-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Chen J, Veach PM, Schoonveld C, Zierhut H. Seekers, finders, settlers, and stumblers: identifying the career paths of males in the genetic counseling profession. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(5):948–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0071-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Nathan ML, Ormond KE, Dial CM, Gamma A, Lunn MR (2019) Genetic counselors’ and genetic counseling students’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward homosexuality J Genet Couns 28(1):98–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0295-8.

  83. Glessner HD, VandenLangenberg E, Veach PM, LeRoy BS. Are genetic counselors and GLBT patients “on the same page”? An investigation of attitudes, practices, and genetic counseling experiences. J Genet Couns. 2011;21(2):326–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9403-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. McGuinniss MA, Tahmassi AG, Ramos E. Towards cultural competence in the genomic age: a review of current health care provider educational trainings and interventions. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2018;6:187–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Alford SH, McBride CM, Reid RJ, Larson EB, Baxevanis AD, Brody LC. Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group. Public Health Genom. 2011;14(2):85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Allford A, Qureshi N, Barwell J, Lewis C, Kai J. What hinders minority ethnic access to cancer genetic services and what may help? Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(7):866–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bentley AR, Callier S, Rotimi CN. Diversity and inclusion in genomic research: why the uneven progress? J Commun Genet. 2017;8(4):255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Claw KG, Anderson MZ, Begay RL, Tsosie KS, Fox K, Nanibaa’ AG. A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2957.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Landry LG, Ali N, Williams DR, Rehm HL, Bonham VL. Lack of diversity in genomic databases is a barrier to translating precision medicine research into practice. Health Aff. 2018;37(5):780–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Saulsberry K, Terry SF. The need to build trust: a perspective on disparities in genetic testing. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17(9):647–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Hindorff LA, Bonham VL, Brody LC, Ginoza ME, Hutter CM, Manolio TA, et al. Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(3):175–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Amendola LM, Berg JS, Horowitz CR, Angelo F, Bensen JT, Biesecker BB, et al. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-generating Research consortium: integrating genomic sequencing in diverse and medically underserved populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103(3):319–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. • Halbert CH, Harrison BW. Genetic counselling among minority populations in the era of precision medicine. Am J Med Genet. 2018;178C:68–74 Highlighting inequity and the need for future resource to reduce health disparities.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Horowitz CR, Ferryman K, Negron R, Sabin T, Rodriguez M, Zinberg RF, et al. Race, genomics and chronic disease: what patients with African ancestry have to say. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(1):248–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Kohut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Kelly Kohut, Sharne Limb and Gillian Crawford each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cancer Genomics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kohut, K., Limb, S. & Crawford, G. The Changing Role of the Genetic Counsellor in the Genomics Era. Curr Genet Med Rep 7, 75–84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40142-019-00163-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40142-019-00163-w

Keywords

Navigation