Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling of Water Holding Capacity Using Readily Available Soil Characteristics

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil water holding capacity (WHC) and its spatial variability is heavily affected by soil organic matter and texture and had significant influence for varied application such as regulating plant growth, soil drainage and soil functional attributes. The present study was conducted in central region of the state of Arunachal Pradesh with the aim of modeling the WHC using readily available soil characteristics. Soil parameters were analyzed using standard methodologies, and WHC modeling was done by developed predictive model using partial least squares regression (PLSR) technique. Water holding capacity (WHC) and bulk density decrease with the increase in altitude. Soil was acidic in nature, and acidity decreases with increasing altitude. Soil texture ranges from sandy loam to sandy clay loam. There was a significant increase in porosity with the increase in altitude and decrease in soil organic matter. The developed models using PLSR technique showed good predictivity based on different statistical performances and error indices ranged R2 = 0.73–0.77; root-mean-square error (RMSE) = 5.69–6.08%; and mean squared error (MSE) = 32.45–37.02%). Variable importance in prediction analysis reflects the relative importance of each soil variables in the developed prediction models. It showed that clay was among the most important influencing variable of WHC followed by soil moisture, altitude and silt. Hence, clay percent can be considered among the most important variable in the model for WHC prediction. Correlation analysis of the variables also showed that water holding capacity was found to be strongly positively correlated (r2 = 0.88) with clay content followed by bulk density (r2 = 0.62) and organic matter (r2 = 0.43). However, a negative relationship was observed with other soil parameters. Based on the analysis of the results, the PLSR developed model results good fit with the selected variables. Hence, it may be concluded that the developed model could be successfully used to predict WHC using identified predictors under limiting data conditions. The findings showed altitude as one of the suitable predictors along with RASCs, as inclusion of this resulted in improvement in predictive accuracy of developed models of WHC. Hence, inclusion of altitude as predictor is being recommended for further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JM, Ingram JSP (1993) Soil biology and fertility—a handbook of methods, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowman WD, Cairns DM, Baron JS, Seastedt TR (2002) Islands in the sky: Alpine and treeline ecosystems of the Rockies. In: Baron JS (ed) Rocky mountain futures: an ecological perspective. Island Press, Washington, pp 183–202

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bromley P (1995) The effect of elevation gain on soil. Environ Stud 102. https://web.williams.edu/wp-etc/ces/soil-elevation-gain.pdf. Retrieved 12 Sept 2017

  5. Chaudhari PR, Ahire DV, Ahire VD, Chakravarty M, Maity S (2013) Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore soil. Int J Sci Res Publ 3(2):1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Tessier S, Rouffignat J (1998) Soil bulk density estimation for soil tillage system and soil texture. Trans ASAE 41:1601–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen H, Ping H, Yan Ping S, Ming H (2003) Physicochemical properties of the main agro-soils in Jiading District, Shanghai. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Agric Sci 21:313–319

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deb P, Debnath P, Pattanaaik SK (2014) Physico-chemical properties and water holding capacity of cultivated soils along altitudinal gradient in south Sikkim, India. Indian J. Agric. Res. 48(2):120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Debnath P, Mahanta M, Ghosh SK (2009) Distribution of available boron in the selected surface and subsurface soils of Terai zone of West Bengal in relation to physico-chemical properties. J Maharastra Agric Univ 3:357–358

    Google Scholar 

  10. Debnath P, Deb P, Sen D, Pattannaik SK, Sah D, Ghosh SK (2012) Physico-chemical properties and its relationship with water holding capacity of cultivated soils along altitudinal gradient in Sikkim. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 5(1):99–102

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garten CT Jr, Post WM III, Hanson PJ, Cooper LW (1999) Forest soil carbon inventories and dynamics along an elevation gradient in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Biogeochem 45:115–145

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kidanemariam A, Gebrekidan H, Mamo T, Kibret K (2012) Impact of altitude and land use type on some physical and chemical properties of acidic soils in Tsegede Highlands, Northern Ethiopia. Open J Soil Sci 2:223–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krull ES, Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA (2004) Functions of soil organic matter and the effect on soil properties. In: Residue management, soil organic carbon and crop performance. RDC Project No. CSO00029. CSIRO Land andWater. PMB2 Glen Osmond SA 5064, p. 46

  15. Kumar S, Kumar M, Sheikh MA (2010) Effect of altitudes on soil and vegetation characteristics of Pinus roxburghii forest in Garhwal Himalaya. J Adv Lab Res Biol 1(2):130–133

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morris GD (2004) Sustaining national water supplies by understanding the dynamic capacity that humus has to increase soil water-holding capacity. Thesis submitted for Master of Sustainable Agriculture, University of Sydney

  17. Njuguna E, Gathara M, Nadir S, Mwalusepo S, Williamson D, Mathe PE, Kimani J, Landmann T, Juma G, Onga’amo G, Gatebe E, Le Ru B, Calatayud PA (2016) Characteristics of soil in selected maize growing sites along altitudinal gradients in east African highlands. Data Br 5:138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Panthi J (2010) Altitudinal variation of soil fertility: a case study from Langtang National Park. M. Sc thesis. Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, Nepal

  19. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ, Romberger JS, Papendick RI (1986) Estimating generalized soil water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50(4):1031–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sevgi O (2003) Altitudinal nutrition growth relations of black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) at Bayramic forest enterprise (Kaz Mountains). Doctorate thesis, University of Istanbul Science Institute

  21. Sevgi O, Tecimen HB (2009) Physical, chemical and pedogenetical properties of soil in with altitude at Kazdagi upland black pine forest. J Environ Biol 30(3):349–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Strong CL, Boulter SL, Laidlaw MJ, Maunsell SC, Putland D and Kitching RL (2011) The physical environment of an altitudinal gradient in the rainforest of Lamington National Park, southeast Queensland. Mem Qld Mus Nat 55(2): 251–270. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835

  23. Tahboub MB, Lindemann CW, Murry L (2008) Chemical and physical properties of soil amended with peacan wood chips. Hortic Sci 43:891–896

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan ZX, Lal R, Smeck NE, Calhoun FG (2004) Relationships between surface soil organic carbon pool and site variables. Geoderma 121(3–4):185–187

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tiwari RK, Bajpai SP (2004) Physico-chemical properties of soil from the core area in Kanha Tiger Reserve. Plant Arch 4:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1951) Soil Survey Manual, USDA Agricultural Handbook. No. 18, U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC

  27. Walker DA, Molenaar JG, Billings WD (2000) Snow-vegetation interactions in tundra environments. In: Jones HG, Pomeroy J, Walker DA, Wharton R (eds) Snow ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 264–322

    Google Scholar 

  28. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Forest officials and staffs of Arunachal Pradesh and Head, Department of Forestry, NERIST (Deemed to be University), for required assistance in the study. Financial Assistance received from NRSC-ISRO, Hyderabad, in the form of research project (VCP-Phase-II) is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed to be University), Nirjuli, Arunachal Pradesh, 791 109, India

    Reetashree Bordoloi, Biswajit Das, Gyati Yam & Om Prakash Tripathi

  2. Department of Agricultural Engineering, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed to be University), Nirjuli, Arunachal Pradesh, 791109, India

    Pankaj K. Pandey

Authors
  1. Reetashree Bordoloi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Biswajit Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gyati Yam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pankaj K. Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Om Prakash Tripathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj K. Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bordoloi, R., Das, B., Yam, G. et al. Modeling of Water Holding Capacity Using Readily Available Soil Characteristics. Agric Res 8, 347–355 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0376-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0376-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation