Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Long-Term Impact of Cyclic Use of Sodic and Canal Waters for Irrigation on Soil Properties and Crop Yields in Cotton–Wheat Rotation in a Semiarid Climate

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 12-year field experiment (1996–2008) was conducted on a sandy loam soil under semiarid climate to study the impact of use of sodic water (SW) and canal water (CW) in various cyclic modes in a cotton–wheat rotation. Treatments included irrigation with CW and SW (residual sodium carbonate 10 meq L−1) and different variants of cyclic modes of CW and SW irrigation. Irrigation with SW caused increase in pH, electrical conductivity (EC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) that resulted in reduced cotton and wheat yields. The mean yield reduction after 6 years was more for seed-cotton (28%) than for wheat (15%); yield reduction in cotton and wheat after 12 years was 35 and 22%, respectively. Cyclic irrigation of CW and SW resulted in lower pH, EC and ESP than under SW irrigation and increased mean yields of both crops. Cyclic treatments starting with CW involving one SW (2CW:SW, CW:SW) or starting with one SW followed by 2CW irrigations (SW:2CW) produced optimum (>90% yields relative to CW) wheat and seed-cotton yields after 6 years. These cyclic modes could sustain optimum crop yields even after 12 years. Reduction in cotton yield after 6 years was more (18%) than in wheat (10%) in cyclic modes starting with SW involving one CW (SW:CW, 2SW:CW). However, extent of reduction in seed-cotton (25%) and wheat yields (17%) after 12 years made these treatments unsustainable on long-term basis. Based on sustainable yield index and buildup of sodicity, 2CW:SW treatment was found to be the most sustainable among various cyclic modes for the cotton–wheat rotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashraf M (2002) Salt tolerance of cotton: some new advances: critical review. Plant Sci 21:1–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1985) Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29, Rev 1. FAO, Rome, pp 31–35

  3. Bajwa MS, Choudhary OP, Josan AS (1992) Effect of continuous irrigation with sodic and saline–sodic waters on soil properties and crop yields under cotton–wheat in northwestern India. Agric Water Manag 22:345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bajwa MS, Josan AS (1989) Effect of alternating sodic and non-sodic irrigations on the build-up of sodium in the soil and on crop yields in Northern India. Exp Agric 25:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choudhary OP, Ghuman BS (2008) Cyclic use of sodic and non-sodic canal waters for irrigation in cotton–wheat cropping system in a semi-arid region. J Sustain Agric 32:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choudhary OP, Ghuman BS, Josan AS, Bajwa MS (2006) Effect of alternating irrigation with sodic and non-sodic waters on soil properties and sunflower yield. Agric Water Manag 85:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choudhary OP, Josan AS, Bajwa MS, Kapur ML (2004) Effect of sustained sodic and saline sodic irrigation and application of gypsum and farmyard manure on yield and quality of sugarcane under semi-arid conditions. Field Crops Res 87:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choudhary OP, Josan AS, Bajwa MS (1996) Tolerance of wheat and triticale to sodicity. Crop Improv (PAU) 23:238–246

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hamdy A, Abdel-Dayem S, Abu-Zeid M (1993) Saline water management for crop production. Agric Water Manag 24:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Josan AS, Bajwa MS, Choudhary OP (1998) Effect of sustained sodic irrigations on physical properties and root growth in a typic ustochrept soil under two cropping systems. J Res (PAU) 35:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mass EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. J Irrig Drain ASCE 103:115–134

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minhas PS, Bajwa MS (2001) Use and management of poor quality waters for the rice–wheat based production system. J Crop Prod 4:273–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Minhas PS, Gupta RK (1992) Quality of irrigation water: assessment and management. ICAR Publication, New Delhi, pp 123–124

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murtaza G, Ghafoor A, Qadir M (2006) Irrigation and soil management strategies for using saline–sodic water in a cotton–wheat rotation. Agric Water Manag 81:98–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oster JD, Shroer FW (1979) Infiltration as influenced by irrigation water quality. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:444–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline alkali soils. USDA Handbook No 60, p 160

  17. Rhoades JD, Bingham FT, Letey J, Hoffman GJ, Dedrick AR, Pinter PJ, Peproyle JA (1989) Use of saline drainage water for irrigation: imperial Valley study. Agric Water Manag 16:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma DP, Tyagi NK (2004) On-farm management of saline drainage water in arid and semi-arid regions. Irrig Drain 53:87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India

    O. P. Choudhary

Authors
  1. O. P. Choudhary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. P. Choudhary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choudhary, O.P. Long-Term Impact of Cyclic Use of Sodic and Canal Waters for Irrigation on Soil Properties and Crop Yields in Cotton–Wheat Rotation in a Semiarid Climate. Agric Res 6, 267–272 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-017-0259-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-017-0259-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation