Erratum to: Acta Neurol Belg DOI 10.1007/s13760-015-0552-7

In the online version of the original article, Figs. 1 and 2 captions have been erroneously switched. The correct version of the figures and their captions are given in the following page.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of post-procedure mTICI scores, stratified by site of AOL. Substantial reperfusion, defined as an mTICI 2B-3, was achieved in 78 % of patients in the overall patient series; in 73 % with an occlusion in the anterior circulation versus 100 % with an posterior circulation occlusion (p = 0.02). ICA internal carotid artery, MCA medial cerebral artery, BA basilar artery, AOL arterial occlusive lesion, mTICI modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction

Fig. 2
figure 2

Functional outcome in all patients, stratified by AOL. In the overall population, GFO was achieved in 42 % of patients and EFO in 26 % EFO. When stratified by anterior versus posterior circulation stroke, no differences were observed: The rate of GFO was 44 % in patients with anterior circulation stroke versus 34 % in patients with basilar artery stroke. ICA internal carotid artery, MCA medial cerebral artery, BA basilar artery, mRS modified Rankin Scale, GFO good functional outcome (mRS 0–2), EFO excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1)